Suppr超能文献

儿童牙科护理中的育儿方式与镇静效果;一项针对4至6岁不合作儿童的研究:结构方程建模方法

Parenting Styles and Sedation Efficacy in Pediatric Dental Care; A Study in Uncooperative Children Aged 4 to 6 Years: Structural Equation Modeling Approach.

作者信息

Gharavi Matine, Salem Katayoun, Shirazi Elham

机构信息

Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Mental Health Research Center, Psychosocial Health Research Institute, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024 Jul 30;38:87. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.38.87. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Behavioral problems in children contribute significantly to non-compliance and lack of cooperation with dentists.This study aimed to assess the impact of parenting styles on the success of conscious sedation with midazolam in uncooperative children aged 4 to 6 years.

METHODS

This short-term longitudinal study included ninety-six children aged 4-6 years who were classified as uncooperative according to the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale (Frankl I, II), requiring pulp treatment and Stainless-Steel Crown (SSC) restoration. Midazolam was orally administered at 0.25 mg/kg. Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ), Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale (CFSS-DS). Treatment began at least thirty minutes post-drug administration. Vital signs were monitored using a pulse oximeter. Sedation effectiveness was assessed with the Houpt scale at local anesthesia injection (T0), cavity preparation (T1), restoration (T2), and treatment conclusion (T3). Statistical analysis used Mann-Whitney U test ( < 0.05).

RESULTS

Most parents (69, 71.9%) had an authoritative parenting style, while 10 (10.4%) were authoritarian, and 17 (17.7%) were permissive. Authoritative parenting is associated significantly with sedation success ( = 0.001) and reduced dental fear ( = 0.008). Conversely, authoritarian ( = 0.031) and permissive ( = 0.001) parenting styles are associated with sedation failure. Authoritarian parenting is associated positively with increased dental fear ( = 0.001). No significant association was found between permissive parenting style and dental fear ( > 0.05). No significant association existed between behavioral problems and parenting styles ( > 0.05). There was no significant association observed between permissive parenting style and dental fear ( = 0.279). Similarly, no significant associations were found between behavioral problems and specific parenting styles: authoritative ( = 0.625), authoritarian ( = 0.050), and permissive ( = 0.522).

CONCLUSION

Understanding parenting styles aids in predicting conscious sedation success with midazolam and assisting in managing uncooperative children during dental procedures.

摘要

背景

儿童的行为问题是导致其不配合牙医治疗以及缺乏合作的重要因素。本研究旨在评估养育方式对4至6岁不合作儿童使用咪达唑仑进行清醒镇静治疗成功率的影响。

方法

这项短期纵向研究纳入了96名4至6岁的儿童,根据弗兰克行为评定量表(Frankl I、II),这些儿童被归类为不合作,需要进行牙髓治疗和不锈钢冠(SSC)修复。口服给予咪达唑仑,剂量为0.25mg/kg。采用养育方式与维度问卷(PSDQ)、长处与困难问卷(SDQ)以及儿童恐惧调查量表-牙科分量表(CFSS-DS)。治疗在给药后至少30分钟开始。使用脉搏血氧仪监测生命体征。在局部麻醉注射时(T0)、窝洞预备时(T1)、修复时(T2)以及治疗结束时(T3),采用豪普特量表评估镇静效果。统计分析采用曼-惠特尼U检验( < 0.05)。

结果

大多数家长(69名,71.9%)采用权威型养育方式,而10名(10.4%)为专制型,17名(17.7%)为放任型。权威型养育方式与镇静成功( = 0.001)以及牙科恐惧减轻( = 0.008)显著相关。相反,专制型( = 0.031)和放任型( = 0.001)养育方式与镇静失败相关。专制型养育方式与牙科恐惧增加呈正相关( = 0.001)。未发现放任型养育方式与牙科恐惧之间存在显著关联( > 0.05)。行为问题与养育方式之间未发现显著关联( > 0.05)。同样,在放任型养育方式与牙科恐惧之间未观察到显著关联( = 0.279)。类似地,在行为问题与特定养育方式之间未发现显著关联:权威型( = 0.625)、专制型( = 0.050)和放任型( = 0.522)。

结论

了解养育方式有助于预测使用咪达唑仑进行清醒镇静的成功率,并有助于在牙科治疗过程中管理不合作儿童。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215a/11644105/f6293a1d60e5/mjiri-38-87-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验