• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中药注射剂联合西药治疗急性扁桃体炎的五维网状Meta分析

A Five-Dimensional Network Meta-Analysis of Chinese Herbal Injections for Treating Acute Tonsillitis Combined With Western Medicine.

作者信息

Huang Peiying, Li Yin, Huang Bixuan, Zhao Shuai, Chen Li, Guan Hansu, Chen Yan, Feng Yuchao, Huang Xiaoyan, Deng Yi, Lei Sisi, Wu Qihua, Zhang Haobo, Zeng Zhongyi, Zeng Linsheng, Chen Bojun

机构信息

The Second Clinical Medical School of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research on Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine, Clinical Research Team of Prevention and Treatment of Cardiac Emergencies with Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 17;13:888073. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.888073. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2022.888073
PMID:35784692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9247210/
Abstract

Acute tonsillitis has high morbidity. Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) were reported to be useful in treating acute tonsillitis and might reduce the probability of antibiotic resistance. Nevertheless, the optimal strategy for combining CHIs with western medicine (WM) to treat acute tonsillitis remains unclear. We retrieved data from the following databases with retrieval time from inception to 11 January 2022: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Weipu Journal Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB2) was used for evaluating the quality of the included studies. R 4.1.2, STATA 14.0, and Python 3.10.4 were employed for network meta-analysis, with 5-dimensional K-means cluster analysis, meta-regression analyses, sensitivity analyses, and subgroup analyses. A total of 110 randomized controlled trials including 12,152 patients were included. All the studies were rated as "high risk" and "some concerns". In terms of improving clinical effectiveness rate, Qingkailing injection + WM ranked ahead of other interventions (89.51%). Regarding reducing antipyretic time, Reduning injection + WM had the highest-ranking probability (68.48%). As for shortening sore throat relief time, Shuanghuanglian injection + WM ranked first (76.82%). Concerning shortening red and swollen tonsils relief time, Yanhuning injection + WM possessed the highest-ranking probability (89.17%). In terms of reducing tonsillar exudate relief time, Xuebijing injection + WM ranked ahead of the other interventions (94.82%). Additionally, the results of the cluster analysis suggested that Xuebijing injection + WM, Reduning injection + WM, and Yanhuning injection + WM were probably the best interventions. Furthermore, adverse drug reactions rate of Xuebijing injection + WM, Reduning injection + WM, Yanhuning injection + WM, Qingkailing injection + WM, and Shuanghuanglian injection + WM were individually 0.00%, 3.11%, 3.08%, 4.29%, and 4.62%. CHIs + WM have a better impact on patients with acute tonsillitis than WM alone. Xuebijing injection, Reduning injection, and Yanhuning injection might have potential advantages in treating the disease. Concerning adverse drug reactions, Xuebijing injection is presumably the optimal CHI. More high-quality studies are needed to further confirm our findings. CRD42022303243; URL= https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=303243.

摘要

急性扁桃体炎发病率高。据报道,中药注射剂(CHIs)可用于治疗急性扁桃体炎,并可能降低抗生素耐药的概率。然而,CHIs与西药(WM)联合治疗急性扁桃体炎的最佳策略仍不明确。我们从以下数据库检索了从建库至2022年1月11日的数据:PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网、万方数据库、维普期刊数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(ROB2)第2版评估纳入研究的质量。采用R 4.1.2、STATA 14.0和Python 3.10.4进行网络荟萃分析,并进行五维K均值聚类分析、meta回归分析、敏感性分析和亚组分析。共纳入110项随机对照试验,涉及12152例患者。所有研究均被评为“高风险”和“有一些担忧”。在提高临床有效率方面,清开灵注射液+西药排名高于其他干预措施(89.51%)。在缩短退热时间方面,热毒宁注射液+西药排名概率最高(68.48%)。在缩短咽痛缓解时间方面,双黄连注射液+西药排名第一(76.82%)。在缩短扁桃体红肿消退时间方面,炎琥宁注射液+西药排名概率最高(89.17%)。在缩短扁桃体渗出物消退时间方面,血必净注射液+西药排名高于其他干预措施(94.82%)。此外,聚类分析结果表明,血必净注射液+西药、热毒宁注射液+西药和炎琥宁注射液+西药可能是最佳干预措施。此外,血必净注射液+西药、热毒宁注射液+西药、炎琥宁注射液+西药、清开灵注射液+西药和双黄连注射液+西药的药物不良反应发生率分别为0.00%、3.11%、3.08%、4.29%和4.62%。CHIs+西药对急性扁桃体炎患者的影响优于单纯西药。血必净注射液、热毒宁注射液和炎琥宁注射液在治疗该病方面可能具有潜在优势。关于药物不良反应,血必净注射液可能是最佳的中药注射剂。需要更多高质量的研究来进一步证实我们的发现。CRD42022303243;网址= https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=303243 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9238/9247210/3b42b4b7da39/fphar-13-888073-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9238/9247210/bd0bd07d490c/fphar-13-888073-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9238/9247210/c862023f5bd1/fphar-13-888073-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9238/9247210/c918c01d41ca/fphar-13-888073-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9238/9247210/38f4e66d5e93/fphar-13-888073-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9238/9247210/3b42b4b7da39/fphar-13-888073-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9238/9247210/bd0bd07d490c/fphar-13-888073-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9238/9247210/c862023f5bd1/fphar-13-888073-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9238/9247210/c918c01d41ca/fphar-13-888073-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9238/9247210/38f4e66d5e93/fphar-13-888073-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9238/9247210/3b42b4b7da39/fphar-13-888073-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A Five-Dimensional Network Meta-Analysis of Chinese Herbal Injections for Treating Acute Tonsillitis Combined With Western Medicine.中药注射剂联合西药治疗急性扁桃体炎的五维网状Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 17;13:888073. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.888073. eCollection 2022.
2
The comparative effects of oral Chinese patent medicines combined with western medicine in stable angina: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 179 trials.口服中成药联合西药治疗稳定型心绞痛的比较效果:一项对179项试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 17;13:918689. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.918689. eCollection 2022.
3
[Bayesian network Meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine injections combined with antiviral western medicine in treatment of influenza].[中药注射剂联合抗病毒西药治疗流感的贝叶斯网络Meta分析]
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2021 Aug;46(16):4252-4264. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20201105.501.
4
Comparative Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for Septic Shock: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.中药注射剂治疗感染性休克的疗效比较:一项基于随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 7;13:850221. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.850221. eCollection 2022.
5
Comparative Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for Treating Severe Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.中药注射剂治疗重症肺炎的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和贝叶斯网络Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 10;12:743486. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.743486. eCollection 2021.
6
Efficacy of five different traditional Chinese medicine injections in acute upper respiratory tract infection in children: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.五种不同中药注射剂治疗儿童急性上呼吸道感染的疗效:网状Meta分析与系统评价
Front Pediatr. 2024 Jun 10;12:1358639. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1358639. eCollection 2024.
7
Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for the Treatment of Primary Nephrotic Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.中药注射剂治疗原发性肾病综合征的疗效:随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Oct 16;11:579241. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.579241. eCollection 2020.
8
Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.中药注射液治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效比较:一项基于随机对照试验的贝叶斯网状Meta 分析。
Phytomedicine. 2019 Oct;63:153009. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2019.153009. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
9
Comparative Efficacy of Tonic Chinese Herbal Injections for Treating Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.滋补类中药注射剂治疗脓毒症或脓毒性休克的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和贝叶斯网络Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 15;13:830030. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.830030. eCollection 2022.
10
Comparative efficacy of commercial oral poly-herbal traditional Chinese medicine formulations combined with western medicine in benign prostatic hyperplasia management: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.商业口服多草药中药配方联合西药治疗良性前列腺增生的比较疗效:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jun 5;15:1358340. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1358340. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Unraveling the Mechanism of Xiaochaihu Granules in Alleviating Yeast-Induced Fever Based on Network Analysis and Experimental Validation.基于网络分析和实验验证揭示小柴胡颗粒缓解酵母致热的机制
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Apr 8;17(4):475. doi: 10.3390/ph17040475.

本文引用的文献

1
[Study on synergistic effect of Qingkailing Injection and Shengmai Injection on organ injury in endotoxemia rats].清开灵注射液与参麦注射液对内毒素血症大鼠器官损伤协同作用的研究
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2021 Aug;46(16):4193-4200. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20210524.404.
2
Efficacy and safety of Reduning injection in the treatment of COVID-19: a randomized, multicenter clinical study.热毒宁注射液治疗 COVID-19 的有效性和安全性:一项随机、多中心临床研究。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 May;10(5):5146-5155. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-2121. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
3
Assessing the Anti-inflammatory Mechanism of Reduning Injection by Network Pharmacology.
基于网络药理学评估热毒宁注射液的抗炎机制。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Dec 16;2020:6134098. doi: 10.1155/2020/6134098. eCollection 2020.
4
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 activities in vitro of Shuanghuanglian preparations and bioactive ingredients.双黄连制剂及生物活性成分体外抗 SARS-CoV-2 活性
Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2020 Sep;41(9):1167-1177. doi: 10.1038/s41401-020-0483-6. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
5
Serum and urine metabolomics based on UPLC-Q-TOF/MS reveals the antipyretic mechanism of Reduning injection in a rat model.基于 UPLC-Q-TOF/MS 的血清和尿液代谢组学揭示热毒宁注射液在大鼠模型中的解热作用机制。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2020 Mar 25;250:112429. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.112429. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
6
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
7
Reevaluation of the post-marketing safety of Xuebijing injection based on real-world and evidence-based evaluations.基于真实世界和基于证据的评估重新评估血必净注射液的上市后安全性。
Biomed Pharmacother. 2019 Jan;109:1523-1531. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.10.190. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
8
A Retrospective Analysis on 1330 Adverse Event Reports of Qingkailing in China: Further Perception of Its Risks and Rational Use.一项在中国进行的清开灵 1330 例不良事件报告的回顾性分析:对其风险和合理应用的进一步认识。
Curr Med Sci. 2018 Dec;38(6):1103-1108. doi: 10.1007/s11596-018-1990-2. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
9
Antiviral effects of Shuanghuanglian injection powder against influenza A virus H5N1 in vitro and in vivo.双黄连粉针剂抗 H5N1 流感病毒的体内外作用
Microb Pathog. 2018 Aug;121:318-324. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 2.
10
[Advantages and evidence of Chinese medicine in prevention and treatment of adult acute tonsillitis].[中医防治成人急性扁桃体炎的优势与证据]
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2017 Apr;42(8):1430-1438. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.2017.0039.