• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用隐性歧视测量法:美国的白种人、黑种人和西班牙裔参与者对特定种族/族裔群体类别(如“白人”、“黑人”和“西班牙裔”)与通用类别“有色人种”(People of Color)的反应不同。

Using Implicit Measures of Discrimination: White, Black, and Hispanic Participants Respond Differently to Group-Specific Racial/Ethnic Categories vs. the General Category "People of Color" in the USA.

机构信息

Istituto Italiano Di Tecnologia, Via Fossato di Mortara, 19, 44121, Ferrara, FE, Italy.

Dipartimento Di Psicologia, Universitá Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico, 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy.

出版信息

J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Aug;10(4):1682-1692. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01353-z. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1007/s40615-022-01353-z
PMID:35790626
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9813272/
Abstract

Recent studies showed that implicit measures are valuable instruments for assessing exposure to discrimination and predicting negative physical conditions. Between March 10, 2020, and April 1, 2020, we conducted three experiments (577 participants) in the USA to evaluate the use of group-specific vs. general race/ethnicity categories in implicit measures of discrimination. We measured implicit discrimination and attitudes towards the general race/ethnicity category "people of color" (POC) and two specific race/ethnicity categories (i.e., "Black people" and "Hispanic people"). Implicit discrimination and attitudes were assessed using the Brief Implicit Association Test (B-IAT). Among participants (mean age = 37, standard deviation = 10.5), 50% identified as White non-Hispanic (NH), 33.3% as Black NH, and 16.7% as Hispanic; 71.7% were female and 72.2% had a bachelor's degree or higher. We found an implicit discrimination towards target groups and an in-group preference among all participant groups only when specific race/ethnicity categories were used in the B-IAT. When the general category POC was used, we observed a discrimination towards POC only for Black NH participants, while White NH participants showed no discrimination. Similarly, Black NH participants showed no in-group preference for POC, but did show an in-group preference for Black people. These results suggest that using the category POC in implicit measures may be inappropriate when evaluating discrimination and attitudes towards Black and Hispanic individuals as it may not capture specific experiences of discrimination and identity in these groups.

摘要

最近的研究表明,内隐测量是评估歧视暴露和预测负面身体状况的有价值工具。2020 年 3 月 10 日至 4 月 1 日,我们在美国进行了三项实验(577 名参与者),以评估在歧视的内隐测量中使用特定群体与一般种族/族裔类别。我们测量了内隐歧视和对“有色人种”(POC)这一一般种族/族裔类别的态度,以及两个特定种族/族裔类别(即“黑人”和“西班牙裔人”)。使用简短内隐联想测验(B-IAT)评估内隐歧视和态度。在参与者中(平均年龄=37 岁,标准差=10.5),50%的人自认为是非西班牙裔白人(NH),33.3%的人自认为是黑人 NH,16.7%的人自认为是西班牙裔;71.7%为女性,72.2%拥有学士学位或以上学历。我们发现,只有当 B-IAT 中使用特定的种族/族裔类别时,所有参与者群体才会表现出针对目标群体的内隐歧视和对内群体的偏好。当使用一般类别 POC 时,我们仅观察到黑人 NH 参与者对 POC 的歧视,而 NH 白人参与者则没有歧视。同样,黑人 NH 参与者对 POC 没有内群体偏好,但对黑人表现出内群体偏好。这些结果表明,在内隐测量中使用 POC 类别可能不适合评估黑人和西班牙裔个体的歧视和态度,因为它可能无法捕捉这些群体中特定的歧视和身份体验。

相似文献

1
Using Implicit Measures of Discrimination: White, Black, and Hispanic Participants Respond Differently to Group-Specific Racial/Ethnic Categories vs. the General Category "People of Color" in the USA.使用隐性歧视测量法:美国的白种人、黑种人和西班牙裔参与者对特定种族/族裔群体类别(如“白人”、“黑人”和“西班牙裔”)与通用类别“有色人种”(People of Color)的反应不同。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Aug;10(4):1682-1692. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01353-z. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
2
The target/perpetrator brief-implicit association test (B-IAT): an implicit instrument for efficiently measuring discrimination based on race/ethnicity, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, weight, and age.目标/犯罪者简要内隐联想测验(B-IAT):一种基于种族/民族、性别、性别认同、性取向、体重和年龄进行歧视的高效测量的内隐工具。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 19;21(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10171-7.
3
Mortgage Discrimination and Racial/Ethnic Concentration Are Associated with Same-Race/Ethnicity Partnering among People Who Inject Drugs in 19 US Cities.抵押贷款歧视和种族/民族集中与 19 个美国城市注射毒品者的同种族/民族伙伴关系有关。
J Urban Health. 2020 Feb;97(1):88-104. doi: 10.1007/s11524-019-00405-w.
4
Experiences With Everyday and Major Forms of Racial/Ethnic Discrimination and Type 2 Diabetes Risk Among White, Black, and Hispanic/Latina Women: Findings From the Sister Study.白人、黑人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔女性的日常和主要形式的种族/族裔歧视经历与 2 型糖尿病风险:来自姐妹研究的结果。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Dec 1;190(12):2552-2562. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab189.
5
A multi-group path analysis of the relationship between perceived racial discrimination and self-rated stress: how does it vary across racial/ethnic groups?多群组路径分析感知种族歧视与自评压力之间的关系:在不同种族/族裔群体中它是如何变化的?
Ethn Health. 2018 Apr;23(3):249-275. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2016.1258042. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
6
Chronic Pain Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in the United States: The Role of Everyday Discrimination and Racial/Ethnic Identity.美国中老年人群的慢性疼痛:日常歧视与种族/民族认同的作用。
J Pain. 2024 May;25(5):104439. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.11.022. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
7
Towards greater understanding of addiction stigma: Intersectionality with race/ethnicity and gender.增进对成瘾污名的理解:与种族/族裔和性别的交叉性
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Dec 1;169:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.10.020. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
8
Trends in Cigar Use in the United States, 2002-2016: Diverging Trends by Race/Ethnicity.美国雪茄使用趋势,2002-2016 年:按种族/民族划分的趋势差异。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 17;22(4):583-587. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz060.
9
The relations of White parents' implicit racial attitudes to their children's differential empathic concern toward White and Black victims.白人父母内隐种族态度与他们的孩子对白人及黑人受害者不同程度的共情关心之间的关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Nov;199:104928. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104928. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
10
Genetic counselor implicit bias and its effects on cognitive and affective exchanges in racially discordant simulations.遗传咨询师的内隐偏见及其对种族差异模拟中认知和情感交流的影响。
J Genet Couns. 2020 Jun;29(3):332-341. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1243. Epub 2020 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing multiple types of discrimination using implicit and explicit measures, comparing target vs. Dominant groups, in a study of smoking/vaping among community health center members in Boston, Massachusetts (2020-2022).在马萨诸塞州波士顿社区卫生中心成员的吸烟/吸电子烟研究(2020 - 2022年)中,使用隐性和显性测量方法分析多种类型的歧视,比较目标群体与主导群体。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Apr 22;24(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02456-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Underweight vs. overweight/obese: which weight category do we prefer? Dissociation of weight-related preferences at the explicit and implicit level.体重过轻与超重/肥胖:我们更喜欢哪种体重类别?体重相关偏好在显性和隐性水平上的分离。
Obes Sci Pract. 2017 Nov 21;3(4):390-398. doi: 10.1002/osp4.136. eCollection 2017 Dec.
2
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.理解与运用内隐联想测验:III. 预测效度的元分析
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jul;97(1):17-41. doi: 10.1037/a0015575.
3
Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review.内隐测量:一项规范性分析与综述。
Psychol Bull. 2009 May;135(3):347-368. doi: 10.1037/a0014211.
4
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
5
Implicit bias among physicians and its prediction of thrombolysis decisions for black and white patients.医生的隐性偏见及其对黑人和白人患者溶栓决策的预测。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Sep;22(9):1231-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0258-5. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
6
Stormy weather: race, gene expression, and the science of health disparities.恶劣天气:种族、基因表达与健康差异科学
Am J Public Health. 2005 Dec;95(12):2155-60. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.067108. Epub 2005 Oct 27.
7
Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers.重度和轻度饮酒者中与酒精相关的内隐和外显认知。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2002 Nov;111(4):648-658. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.111.4.648.
8
Math = male, me = female, therefore math not = me.数学 = 男性,我 = 女性,所以数学 ≠ 我。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jul;83(1):44-59.
9
Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept.使用内隐联想测验来测量自尊和自我概念。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Dec;79(6):1022-38. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.1022.
10
Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: the blind men and the elephant revisited?探寻内隐自尊的完美衡量标准:重温盲人摸象的故事?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Oct;79(4):631-43.