Department of Neurology (Sleep Disorders), The Affiliated Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 238000, Chaohu, China.
Department of Geriatrics, Hefei First People's Hospital, Hefei, 230092, China.
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 5;22(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04091-y.
The objective of this study was to explore the stigma and related influencing factors in individuals with chronic insomnia disorder (CID).
A total of 70 CID patients and 70 healthy controls (CON) were enrolled in the study. All subjects completed the assessments of sleep, emotion, and cognition. Their stigma and life quality were measured using the Chronic Stigma Scale and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).
The ratio of individuals with stigma was significantly different between CID and CON groups (C = 35.6, p < 0.001). Compared with the CON group, the CID group had higher scores for total stigma (U = 662.0, p < 0.001), internalized stigma (U = 593.0, p < 0.001), enacted stigma (U = 1568.0, p < 0.001), PSQI (U = 2485.0, p < 0.001) and HAMD-17 (U = 69.5, p < 0.001) as well as lower scores for MoCA-C (U = 3997.5, p < 0.001) and most items of SF-36. Partial correlation analysis showed that different items of the Chronic Stigma Scale were positively correlated with illness duration, PSQI and HAMD-17 scores, while negatively correlated with one or more items of the SF-36. Multivariate regression analysis showed that illness duration and the Mental Health domain of the SF-36 were independent risk factors for one or more items of stigma in CID patients.
Patients with CID have an increased risk of stigma. Moreover, illness duration and Mental Health may be primary factors related to stigma.
本研究旨在探讨慢性失眠障碍(CID)个体的污名和相关影响因素。
共纳入 70 例 CID 患者和 70 例健康对照(CON)。所有受试者均完成睡眠、情绪和认知评估。采用慢性污名量表和 36 项简明健康调查量表(SF-36)评估其污名和生活质量。
CID 组和 CON 组的个体存在污名的比例存在显著差异(C=35.6,p<0.001)。与 CON 组相比,CID 组的总污名(U=662.0,p<0.001)、内化污名(U=593.0,p<0.001)、外显污名(U=1568.0,p<0.001)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)(U=2485.0,p<0.001)和汉密尔顿抑郁量表 17 项(HAMD-17)(U=69.5,p<0.001)得分更高,而蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA-C)(U=3997.5,p<0.001)和 SF-36 多项得分更低。偏相关分析显示,慢性污名量表的不同条目与病程、PSQI 和 HAMD-17 评分呈正相关,与 SF-36 的一项或多项条目呈负相关。多元回归分析显示,病程和 SF-36 的心理健康维度是 CID 患者存在一项或多项污名的独立危险因素。
CID 患者存在更高的污名风险。此外,病程和心理健康可能是与污名相关的主要因素。