• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初次感染后对SARS-CoV-2再感染的观察性保护:一项丹麦队列研究,使用两年全国PCR检测数据,研究对象为未接种疫苗者。

Observed protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection following a primary infection: A Danish cohort study among unvaccinated using two years of nationwide PCR-test data.

作者信息

Michlmayr Daniela, Hansen Christian Holm, Gubbels Sophie Madeleine, Valentiner-Branth Palle, Bager Peter, Obel Niels, Drewes Birgitte, Møller Camilla Holten, Møller Frederik Trier, Legarth Rebecca, Mølbak Kåre, Ethelberg Steen

机构信息

Department of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.

European Programme for Public Health Microbiology Training (EUPHEM), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Gustav III:s Boulevard 40, 16973 Solna, Sweden.

出版信息

Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Sep;20:100452. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100452. Epub 2022 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100452
PMID:35791335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9245510/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The level of protection after a SARS-CoV-2 infection against reinfection and COVID-19 disease remains important with much of the world still unvaccinated.

METHODS

Analysing nationwide, individually referable, Danish register data including RT-PCR-test results, we conducted a cohort study using Cox regression to compare SARS-CoV-2 infection rates before and after a primary infection among still unvaccinated individuals, adjusting for sex, age, comorbidity and residency region. Estimates of protection against infection were calculated as 1 minus the hazard ratio. Estimates of protection against symptomatic infections and infections leading to hospitalisation were also calculated. The prevalence of infections classified as symptomatic or asymptomatic was compared for primary infections and reinfections. The study also assessed protection against each of the main viral variants after a primary infection with an earlier variant by restricting follow-up time to distinct, mutually exclusive periods during which each variant dominated.

FINDINGS

Until 1 July 2021 the estimated protection against reinfection was 83.4% (95%CI: 82.2-84.6%); but lower for the 65+ year-olds (72.2%; 95%CI: 53.2-81.0%). Moderately higher estimates were found for protection against symptomatic disease, 88.3% overall (95%CI: 85.9-90.3%). First-time cases who reported no symptoms were more likely to experience a reinfection (odds ratio: 1.48; 95%CI: 1.35-1.62). By autumn 2021, when infections were almost exclusively caused by the Delta variant, the estimated protection following a recent first infection was 91.3% (95%CI: 89.7-92.7%) compared to 71.4% (95%CI: 66.9-75.3%) after a first infection over a year earlier. With Omicron, a first infection with an earlier variant in the past 3-6 months gave an estimated 51.0% (95%CI: 50.1-52.0%) protection, whereas a first infection longer than 12 months earlier provided only 19.0% (95%CI: 17.2-20.5%) protection. Protection by an earlier variant-infection against hospitalisation due to a new infection was estimated at: 86.6% (95%CI: 46.3-96.7%) for Alpha, 97.2% (95%CI: 89.0-99.3%) for Delta, and 69.8% (95%CI: 51.5-81.2%) for the Omicron variant.

INTERPRETATION

SARS-CoV-2 infection offered a high level of sustained protection against reinfection, comparable with that offered by vaccines, but decreased with the introduction of new main virus variants; dramatically so when Omicron appeared. Protection was lower among the elderly but appeared more pronounced following symptomatic compared to asymptomatic infections. The level of estimated protection against serious disease was somewhat higher than that against infection and possibly longer lasting. Decreases in protection against reinfection, seemed primarily to be driven by viral evolution.

FUNDING

None.

摘要

背景

在世界上许多地区仍未接种疫苗的情况下,新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)感染后对再次感染和新冠疾病的保护水平仍然很重要。

方法

我们分析了丹麦全国范围内可单独溯源的登记数据,包括逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测结果,采用Cox回归进行队列研究,以比较未接种疫苗个体初次感染前后的SARS-CoV-2感染率,并对性别、年龄、合并症和居住地区进行了调整。预防感染的估计值计算为1减去风险比。还计算了预防有症状感染和导致住院的感染的估计值。比较了初次感染和再次感染中分类为有症状或无症状感染的患病率。该研究还通过将随访时间限制在每个主要病毒变异株占主导的不同、相互排斥的时期,评估了初次感染较早变异株后对每种主要病毒变异株的保护作用。

结果

截至2021年7月1日,估计对再次感染的保护率为83.4%(95%置信区间:82.2-84.6%);但65岁及以上人群的保护率较低(72.2%;95%置信区间:53.2-81.0%)。发现预防有症状疾病的估计值略高,总体为88.3%(95%置信区间:85.9-90.3%)。报告无症状的初次感染者更有可能再次感染(优势比:1.48;95%置信区间:1.35-1.62)。到2021年秋季,当感染几乎完全由德尔塔变异株引起时,最近初次感染后的估计保护率为91.3%(95%置信区间:89.7-92.7%),而一年多前初次感染后的保护率为71.4%(95%置信区间:66.9-75.3%)。对于奥密克戎变异株,在过去3-6个月内初次感染较早变异株的估计保护率为51.0%(95%置信区间:50.1-52.0%),而初次感染超过12个月前的保护率仅为19.0%(95%置信区间:17.2-20.5%)。较早变异株感染对因新感染导致住院的保护率估计为:阿尔法变异株为86.6%(95%置信区间:46.3-96.7%),德尔塔变异株为97.2%(95%置信区间:89.0-99.3%),奥密克戎变异株为69.8%(95%置信区间:51.5-81.2%)。

解读

SARS-CoV-2感染对再次感染提供了高水平的持续保护,与疫苗提供的保护相当,但随着新的主要病毒变异株的出现而降低;奥密克戎出现时下降幅度很大。老年人的保护作用较低,但与无症状感染相比,有症状感染后的保护作用似乎更明显。预防严重疾病的估计保护水平略高于预防感染的水平,且可能持续时间更长。对再次感染的保护作用下降似乎主要是由病毒进化驱动的。

资金来源

无。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ab/9256644/1dde14137cd3/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ab/9256644/f50397fbb5e9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ab/9256644/42933117bbee/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ab/9256644/1dde14137cd3/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ab/9256644/f50397fbb5e9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ab/9256644/42933117bbee/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ab/9256644/1dde14137cd3/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Observed protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection following a primary infection: A Danish cohort study among unvaccinated using two years of nationwide PCR-test data.初次感染后对SARS-CoV-2再感染的观察性保护:一项丹麦队列研究,使用两年全国PCR检测数据,研究对象为未接种疫苗者。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Sep;20:100452. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100452. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
2
Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection during periods of Alpha, Delta, or Omicron dominance: A Danish nationwide study.疫苗对 Alpha、Delta 或奥密克戎变异株流行期间 SARS-CoV-2 再感染的有效性:一项丹麦全国性研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Nov 22;19(11):e1004037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004037. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 hospitalization with the Alpha, Delta, or Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant: A nationwide Danish cohort study.疫苗对 Alpha、Delta 或奥密克戎变异株引起的 SARS-CoV-2 感染或 COVID-19 住院的有效性:一项全国性丹麦队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Sep 1;19(9):e1003992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003992. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Protection against symptomatic infection with delta (B.1.617.2) and omicron (B.1.1.529) BA.1 and BA.2 SARS-CoV-2 variants after previous infection and vaccination in adolescents in England, August, 2021-March, 2022: a national, observational, test-negative, case-control study.2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 3 月,英国青少年在先前感染和接种疫苗后对 delta(B.1.617.2)和 omicron(B.1.1.529)BA.1 和 BA.2 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的症状性感染的保护作用:一项全国性、观察性、基于检测的病例对照研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Apr;23(4):435-444. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00729-0. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
5
Protective immunity of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccines against medically attended symptomatic omicron BA.4, BA.5, and XBB reinfections in Singapore: a national cohort study.新加坡一项全国性队列研究:SARS-CoV-2 感染和疫苗对有医疗记录的奥密克戎 BA.4、BA.5 和 XBB 再感染相关症状的保护免疫作用。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Jul;23(7):799-805. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00060-9. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
6
Comparative analysis of the risks of hospitalisation and death associated with SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) and delta (B.1.617.2) variants in England: a cohort study.比较分析英国住院和死亡风险与 SARS-CoV-2 奥密克戎(B.1.1.529)和德尔塔(B.1.617.2)变异株的关系:一项队列研究。
Lancet. 2022 Apr 2;399(10332):1303-1312. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00462-7. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
7
SARS-CoV-2 incidence, transmission and reinfection in a rural and an urban setting: results of the PHIRST-C cohort study, South Africa, 2020-2021.2020 - 2021年南非农村和城市地区严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的发病率、传播及再感染情况:PHIRST-C队列研究结果
medRxiv. 2021 Dec 4:2021.07.20.21260855. doi: 10.1101/2021.07.20.21260855.
8
Risk of reinfection, vaccine protection, and severity of infection with the BA.5 omicron subvariant: a nation-wide population-based study in Denmark.BA.5 奥密克戎亚变体再感染风险、疫苗保护效力和感染严重程度:丹麦全国基于人群的研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Feb;23(2):167-176. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00595-3. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
9
Risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and COVID-19 hospitalisation in individuals with natural and hybrid immunity: a retrospective, total population cohort study in Sweden.具有自然免疫和混合免疫的个体中再次感染SARS-CoV-2和因COVID-19住院的风险:瑞典一项回顾性全人群队列研究
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jun;22(6):781-790. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00143-8. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
10
Effectiveness of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine third doses and previous infection in protecting against SARS-CoV-2 infections during the Delta and Omicron variant waves; the UK SIREN cohort study September 2021 to February 2022.第三剂 BNT162b2 mRNA 疫苗和既往感染对德尔塔和奥密克戎变异株流行期间预防 SARS-CoV-2 感染的有效性:英国 SIREN 队列研究,2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 2 月。
J Infect. 2024 Jan;88(1):30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.10.022. Epub 2023 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Data for action - description of the automated COVID-19 surveillance system in Denmark and lessons learnt, January 2020 to June 2024.用于行动的数据——丹麦新冠病毒自动化监测系统的描述及经验教训,2020年1月至2024年6月
Epidemiol Infect. 2025 Mar 14;153:e58. doi: 10.1017/S0950268825000263.
2
Infection with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy and risk of stillbirth: a Scandinavian registry study.孕期感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型与死产风险:一项斯堪的纳维亚登记研究
BMJ Public Health. 2023 Oct 25;1(1):e000314. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000314. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Prediction of SARS-CoV-2 infection cases based on the meta-SEIRS model.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection associated with emergence of Omicron in South Africa.南非出现奥密克戎后,SARS-CoV-2 再感染的风险增加。
Science. 2022 May 6;376(6593):eabn4947. doi: 10.1126/science.abn4947.
2
Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant.Covid-19 疫苗对奥密克戎(B.1.1.529)变异株的有效性。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Apr 21;386(16):1532-1546. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2119451. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
3
Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression.
基于元 SEIRS 模型预测 SARS-CoV-2 感染病例。
Epidemiol Infect. 2024 Nov 18;152:e144. doi: 10.1017/S0950268824001274.
4
Compromised CD8+ T cell immunity in the aged brain increases severity of neurotropic coronavirus infection and postinfectious cognitive impairment.老年大脑中受损的CD8 + T细胞免疫会增加嗜神经冠状病毒感染的严重程度和感染后认知障碍。
Aging Cell. 2025 Mar;24(3):e14409. doi: 10.1111/acel.14409. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
5
Post-COVID-19 Condition Fatigue Outcomes Among Danish Residents.丹麦居民的新冠后疲劳状况结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2434863. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.34863.
6
The Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-Protein IgG, Which Is Detected Using the Chemiluminescence Microparticle Immunoassay (CMIA) in Individuals Having Either a History of COVID-19 Vaccination and/or SARS-CoV-2 Infection, Showed a High-Titer Neutralizing Effect.用化学发光微粒子免疫分析(CMIA)检测到的针对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白 IgG 的抗体,在有 COVID-19 疫苗接种史和/或 SARS-CoV-2 感染史的个体中,显示出高滴度的中和作用。
Viruses. 2024 Sep 3;16(9):1409. doi: 10.3390/v16091409.
7
Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.奥密克戎变异株再感染风险的混合免疫元分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 26;12:1457266. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1457266. eCollection 2024.
8
COVID-19 reinfections in Mexico City: implications for public health.墨西哥城的 COVID-19 再感染:对公共卫生的影响。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 14;11:1321283. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1321283. eCollection 2023.
9
Antigen non-specific CD8 T cells accelerate cognitive decline in aged mice following respiratory coronavirus infection.抗原非特异性CD8 T细胞加速呼吸道冠状病毒感染后老年小鼠的认知衰退。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jan 3:2024.01.02.573675. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.02.573675.
10
Protective effect of previous infection and vaccination against reinfection with BA.5 Omicron subvariant: a nationwide population-based study in Japan.既往感染和接种疫苗对BA.5奥密克戎亚变体再感染的保护作用:日本一项基于全国人群的研究
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Sep 25;41:100911. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100911. eCollection 2023 Dec.
疫苗预防严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型(SARS-CoV-2)感染和 COVID-19 疾病有效性的持续时间:系统评价和荟萃回归的结果。
Lancet. 2022 Mar 5;399(10328):924-944. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00152-0. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
4
SARS-CoV-2 reinfections: Overview of efficacy and duration of natural and hybrid immunity.SARS-CoV-2 再感染:自然和混合免疫的疗效和持续时间概述。
Environ Res. 2022 Jun;209:112911. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112911. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
5
Protection against the Omicron Variant from Previous SARS-CoV-2 Infection.既往感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2对奥密克戎变异株的防护作用。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 31;386(13):1288-1290. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2200133. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
6
The T cell immune response against SARS-CoV-2.针对 SARS-CoV-2 的 T 细胞免疫应答。
Nat Immunol. 2022 Feb;23(2):186-193. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-01122-w. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
7
Relative infectiousness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine breakthrough infections, reinfections, and primary infections.SARS-CoV-2 疫苗突破性感染、再感染和原发感染的相对传染性。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jan 27;13(1):532. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28199-7.
8
Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and death when combining a first dose ChAdOx1 vaccine with a subsequent mRNA vaccine in Denmark: A nationwide population-based cohort study.当在丹麦将第一剂 ChAdOx1 疫苗与随后的 mRNA 疫苗相结合时,针对 SARS-CoV-2 感染、住院和死亡的疫苗有效性:一项全国范围内基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2021 Dec 17;18(12):e1003874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003874. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
Epidemiological characterisation of the first 785 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant cases in Denmark, December 2021.丹麦 2021 年 12 月前 785 例 SARS-CoV-2 奥密克戎变异株病例的流行病学特征。
Euro Surveill. 2021 Dec;26(50). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.50.2101146.
10
Equivalency of Protection From Natural Immunity in COVID-19 Recovered Versus Fully Vaccinated Persons: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.新冠康复者与完全接种疫苗者自然免疫的保护等效性:一项系统评价与汇总分析
Cureus. 2021 Oct 28;13(10):e19102. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19102. eCollection 2021 Oct.