Suppr超能文献

制定有效的劳动力培训计划,以支持老年人的长期护理:综述研究。

Developing effective workforce training to support the long-term care of older adults: A review of reviews.

机构信息

Department for Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, York, UK.

King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):2202-2217. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13897. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

Abstract

This review of reviews aimed to identify and synthesise evidence to support the design of learning interventions for non-registered practitioners supporting older people in long-term care (people's own homes, hospices or residential/nursing care). Our objectives were to inform the analysis part of the Analysis, Design, Development Implementation and Evaluation framework by finding evidence on the following five components of learning: content, format (teaching strategies and resources/media), structure, contextual factors (barriers and enablers) and measures used when monitoring the effectives of learning. Databases searched included Pro-quest (ASSIA), Scopus, Ovid (PsycINFO, Medline, Embase and Social Policy and Practice), SCIE Online and Cochrane Reviews and reference searching, with the last search being conducted in April 2021. Fifteen papers were identified as eligible for inclusion. Most of the interventions aimed to improve dementia care (n = 10), with others exploring LGBT+ competency (n = 2), or other forms of professional development (n = 3). Common features of effective learning included a multifaceted approach, with in-practice learning being blended with additional implementation strategies (e.g. supervision) and didactic learning/worksheets. An important contextual factor was working within an organisational culture which supported shared learning and reflection. This may also help encourage engagement with training, where staff are unwilling to attend if it may compromise care delivery. Future research should focus on the characteristics of trainers and the structure of learning, with more research being needed in in mental and physical morbidities outside the remit of dementia to improve the overall quality of the social care workforce.

摘要

这篇综述旨在识别和综合证据,以支持为支持长期护理中老年人(在老年人自己的家中、临终关怀院或居住/护理机构)的非注册从业者设计学习干预措施。我们的目标是通过查找关于以下五个学习要素的证据,为分析、设计、开发、实施和评估框架的分析部分提供信息:内容、格式(教学策略和资源/媒体)、结构、情境因素(障碍和促进因素)以及监测学习效果时使用的措施。搜索的数据库包括 Pro-quest(ASSIA)、Scopus、Ovid(PsycINFO、Medline、Embase 和 Social Policy and Practice)、SCIE Online 和 Cochrane Reviews 以及参考文献搜索,最后一次搜索于 2021 年 4 月进行。确定了 15 篇符合纳入标准的论文。大多数干预措施旨在改善痴呆症护理(n=10),其他研究则探讨了 LGBT+能力(n=2)或其他形式的专业发展(n=3)。有效学习的共同特征包括多方面的方法,将实践中的学习与其他实施策略(例如监督)和教学学习/工作表相结合。一个重要的情境因素是在支持共同学习和反思的组织文化中工作。这也可能有助于鼓励员工参与培训,如果培训可能会影响护理提供,员工不愿意参加培训。未来的研究应重点关注培训师的特点和学习结构,需要在痴呆症范围之外的精神和身体疾病方面进行更多研究,以提高整个社会护理人员队伍的质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e72/10084219/fd9670908581/HSC-30-2202-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验