• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电力生产的土地利用强度与明日的能源面貌。

Land-use intensity of electricity production and tomorrow's energy landscape.

机构信息

Fastest Path to Zero Initiative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.

Breakthrough Institute, Oakland, CA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jul 6;17(7):e0270155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270155. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0270155
PMID:35793381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9258890/
Abstract

The global energy system has a relatively small land footprint at present, comprising just 0.4% of ice-free land. This pales in comparison to agricultural land use- 30-38% of ice-free land-yet future low-carbon energy systems that shift to more extensive technologies could dramatically alter landscapes around the globe. The challenge is more acute given the projected doubling of global energy consumption by 2050 and widespread electrification of transportation and industry. Yet unlike greenhouse gas emissions, land use intensity of energy has been rarely studied in a rigorous way. Here we calculate land-use intensity of energy (LUIE) for real-world sites across all major sources of electricity, integrating data from published literature, databases, and original data collection. We find a range of LUIE that span four orders of magnitude, from nuclear with 7.1 ha/TWh/y to dedicated biomass at 58,000 ha/TWh/y. By applying these LUIE results to the future electricity portfolios of ten energy scenarios, we conclude that land use could become a significant constraint on deep decarbonization of the power system, yet low-carbon, land-efficient options are available.

摘要

目前,全球能源系统的土地足迹相对较小,仅占无冰土地的 0.4%。这与农业用地(无冰土地的 30-38%)相比相形见绌,但未来转向更广泛技术的低碳能源系统可能会极大地改变全球各地的景观。鉴于到 2050 年全球能源消耗预计将翻一番,以及交通运输和工业的广泛电气化,这一挑战更加严峻。然而,与温室气体排放不同,能源的土地利用强度很少以严格的方式进行研究。在这里,我们通过整合来自已发表文献、数据库和原始数据收集的数据,为所有主要电力来源的实际地点计算了能源的土地利用强度(LUIE)。我们发现,能源的土地利用强度范围跨越四个数量级,从核能的 7.1 公顷/太瓦时/年到专用生物质能的 58,000 公顷/太瓦时/年。通过将这些 LUIE 结果应用于十个能源情景的未来电力组合,我们得出结论,土地利用可能成为电力系统深度脱碳的一个重大制约因素,但存在低碳、高效利用土地的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5994/9258890/7ab1a48a578d/pone.0270155.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5994/9258890/82ad5c470c25/pone.0270155.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5994/9258890/68bee11f0dee/pone.0270155.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5994/9258890/4cfb4794c05e/pone.0270155.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5994/9258890/7ab1a48a578d/pone.0270155.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5994/9258890/82ad5c470c25/pone.0270155.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5994/9258890/68bee11f0dee/pone.0270155.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5994/9258890/4cfb4794c05e/pone.0270155.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5994/9258890/7ab1a48a578d/pone.0270155.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Land-use intensity of electricity production and tomorrow's energy landscape.电力生产的土地利用强度与明日的能源面貌。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 6;17(7):e0270155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270155. eCollection 2022.
2
Land-use and alternative bioenergy pathways for waste biomass.土地利用和替代生物能源途径的废物生物质。
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Nov 15;44(22):8665-9. doi: 10.1021/es100681g. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
3
Ecological footprints of environmental resources for agricultural production in Iran: a model-based study.伊朗农业生产环境资源的生态足迹:基于模型的研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Dec;28(48):68972-68981. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15119-3. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
4
Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies.电力供应情景的综合生命周期评估证实了低碳技术对全球环境的益处。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 19;112(20):6277-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312753111. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
5
Energy balance and emissions associated with biochar sequestration and pyrolysis bioenergy production.与生物炭封存及热解生物能源生产相关的能量平衡和排放
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Jun 1;42(11):4152-8. doi: 10.1021/es071361i.
6
Land-Sparing Opportunities for Solar Energy Development in Agricultural Landscapes: A Case Study of the Great Central Valley, CA, United States.在农业景观中节约土地开发太阳能的机会:以美国加利福尼亚州大中央谷为例。
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Dec 19;51(24):14472-14482. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05110.
7
Investigation of carbon footprint effect of renewable power plants regarding energy production: A case study of a city in Turkey.可再生能源发电厂能源生产的碳足迹效应调查:以土耳其某城市为例。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2022 Mar;72(3):294-307. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2022.2028690. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
8
Comparison greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and global warming potential (GWP) effect of energy use in different wheat agroecosystems in Iran.比较伊朗不同小麦农业生态系统中能源使用的温室气体(GHG)排放和全球变暖潜势(GWP)效应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Apr;23(8):7390-7. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5964-7. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
9
Electricity generation: options for reduction in carbon emissions.发电:减少碳排放的选项
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2002 Aug 15;360(1797):1653-68. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1025.
10
Bioenergy production from perennial energy crops: a consequential LCA of 12 bioenergy scenarios including land use changes.从多年生能源作物中生产生物能源:包括土地利用变化在内的 12 种生物能源情景的综合生命周期评价。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Dec 18;46(24):13521-30. doi: 10.1021/es3024435. Epub 2012 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Vertical farming limitations and potential demonstrated by back-of-the-envelope calculations.通过粗略计算展示的垂直农场的局限性与潜力。
Plant Physiol. 2025 Jul 3;198(3). doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiaf056.
2
Immediate Effect of Floating Solar Energy Deployment on Greenhouse Gas Dynamics in Ponds.漂浮式太阳能发电对池塘温室气体动态的即时影响
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Dec 17;58(50):22104-22113. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c06363. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
3
Climate-Smart Siting for renewable energy expansion.可再生能源扩张的气候智能选址

本文引用的文献

1
Vulnerability of avian populations to renewable energy production.鸟类种群对可再生能源生产的脆弱性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Mar 30;9(3):211558. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211558. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Energy Sprawl Is the Largest Driver of Land Use Change in United States.能源扩张是美国土地利用变化的最大驱动因素。
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 8;11(9):e0162269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162269. eCollection 2016.
3
Solar energy development impacts on land cover change and protected areas.太阳能开发对土地覆盖变化和保护区的影响。
iScience. 2024 Aug 3;27(10):110666. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110666. eCollection 2024 Oct 18.
4
Climate change and California's terrestrial biodiversity.气候变化与加利福尼亚的陆地生物多样性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 6;121(32):e2310074121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2310074121. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
5
Drivers and implications of alternative routes to fuels decarbonization in net-zero energy systems.净零能源系统中燃料脱碳替代途径的驱动因素及影响
Nat Commun. 2024 May 10;15(1):3938. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47059-0.
6
Georectified polygon database of ground-mounted large-scale solar photovoltaic sites in the United States.美国地面安装式大型太阳能光伏电站的地理校正多边形数据库。
Sci Data. 2023 Nov 8;10(1):760. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02644-8.
7
Parametric Life Cycle Assessment of Nuclear Power for Simplified Models.核动力的参数化生命周期评估:简化模型。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Sep 26;57(38):14194-14205. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c03190. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
8
Solar Energy-driven Land-cover Change Could Alter Landscapes Critical to Animal Movement in the Continental United States.太阳能驱动的土地覆盖变化可能改变对美国大陆动物迁移至关重要的景观。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Aug 8;57(31):11499-11509. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c00578. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 3;112(44):13579-84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517656112. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
4
A World at Risk: Aggregating Development Trends to Forecast Global Habitat Conversion.处于风险中的世界:汇总发展趋势以预测全球栖息地转变
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 7;10(10):e0138334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138334. eCollection 2015.
5
Long-term census data reveal abundant wildlife populations at Chernobyl.长期的人口普查数据显示,切尔诺贝利有大量的野生动物种群。
Curr Biol. 2015 Oct 5;25(19):R824-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.017.
6
Incorporating land-use requirements and environmental constraints in low-carbon electricity planning for California.将土地利用要求和环境约束纳入加利福尼亚低碳电力规划。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Feb 17;49(4):2013-21. doi: 10.1021/es502979v. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
7
Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies.电力供应情景的综合生命周期评估证实了低碳技术对全球环境的益处。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 19;112(20):6277-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312753111. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
8
Quantifying habitat impacts of natural gas infrastructure to facilitate biodiversity offsetting.量化天然气基础设施对生境的影响,以促进生物多样性补偿。
Ecol Evol. 2014 Jan;4(1):79-90. doi: 10.1002/ece3.884. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
9
Solar energy in the context of energy use, energy transportation and energy storage.太阳能在能源利用、能源运输和能源存储方面的应用。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2013 Jul 1;371(1996):20110431. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0431. Print 2013 Aug 13.
10
Characterising the impacts of emerging energy development on wildlife, with an eye towards mitigation.描述新兴能源开发对野生动物的影响,着眼于缓解影响。
Ecol Lett. 2013 Jan;16(1):112-25. doi: 10.1111/ele.12009. Epub 2012 Sep 26.