Wolfe Amy H J, Hinds Pamela S, du Plessis Adre J, Gordish-Dressman Heather, Arnold Robert M, Soghier Lamia
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
Department of Pediatrics, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Jun 30;4(7):e0721. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000721. eCollection 2022 Jul.
This study had three aims: 1) quantify the difference in stress levels between low and high stress roles during simulated critical communication encounters using objective physiologic data (heart rate variability [HRV]) and subjective measures (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI]), 2) define the relationship between subjective and objective measures of stress, and 3) define the impact of trainee preparedness and reported self-efficacy on stress levels.
Mixed methods simulation-based study.
Single center.
Pediatric critical care fellows and faculty ( = 12).
Subjects participated in six simulated scenarios in both high stress "hot seat" and low stress "observer" roles.
Subjective stress was measured using the STAI at baseline and after each scenario. Objective stress was measured continuously using a wearable biometric device measuring HRV. Previous residency communication training and self-confidence surrounding various communication topics were collected via questionnaire. Significant changes in subjective (STAI) and objective stress (HRV) measurements in the low- versus high-stress roles were observed. STAI scores increased 8 points during low stress and 12 points during high stress role ( = 0.021) compared with baseline. Two specific HRV markers, root mean square of successive differences between normal heartbeats, a marker of parasympathetic tone, and the low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF) ratio, a marker of sympathetic activation, were significantly correlated with STAI levels (-0.032, = 0.001; 1.030, = 0.002, respectively). Participants who reported increased confidence in discussing code status had a significant decrease in stress response (measured via LF/HF ratio) during both the observer ( = 0.033) and hot seat roles ( = <0.001).
Communicating life-altering news in a simulated environment is a stressful experience. This stress results in physiologic changes that can be measured continuously using HRV. HRV measurement may serve as a novel method in evaluating the effectiveness of communication training programs and measuring future stress-reduction interventions.
本研究有三个目的:1)使用客观生理数据(心率变异性[HRV])和主观测量方法(状态-特质焦虑量表[STAI]),量化模拟关键沟通场景中低压力和高压力角色之间的压力水平差异;2)确定压力的主观和客观测量方法之间的关系;3)确定学员准备情况和报告的自我效能感对压力水平的影响。
基于模拟的混合方法研究。
单中心。
儿科重症监护住院医师和教员(n = 12)。
受试者分别以高压力“关键位置”和低压力“观察者”角色参与六个模拟场景。
在基线和每个场景后使用STAI测量主观压力。使用可穿戴生物识别设备连续测量HRV来测量客观压力。通过问卷收集先前的住院医师沟通培训以及围绕各种沟通主题的自信心。观察到低压力和高压力角色在主观(STAI)和客观压力(HRV)测量方面有显著变化。与基线相比,低压力角色期间STAI得分增加8分,高压力角色期间增加12分(P = 0.021)。两个特定的HRV指标,正常心跳之间连续差异的均方根,一个副交感神经张力指标,以及低频/高频(LF/HF)比值,一个交感神经激活指标,与STAI水平显著相关(分别为-0.032,P = 0.001;1.030,P = 0.002)。报告在讨论代码状态方面信心增强的参与者在观察者角色(P = 0.033)和关键位置角色(P = <0.001)期间的压力反应(通过LF/HF比值测量)显著降低。
在模拟环境中传达改变生活的消息是一种有压力的经历。这种压力会导致生理变化,可使用HRV进行连续测量。HRV测量可作为评估沟通培训项目效果和测量未来减压干预措施的一种新方法。