Naz Shagufta, Khan Farhan Raza, Khan Irfan, Zohra Raheela Rahmat, Salim Asmat, Mohammed Nuruddin, Ahmad Tashfeen
Ms. Shagufta Naz, M.Sc. Department of Biotechnology, University of Karachi, Pakistan. Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Dr. Farhan Raza Khan, FCPS. Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 May-Jun;38(5):1228-1237. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.5.5187.
Owing to high proliferation rate, multipotency and self-renewal capability, dental pulp stem cells (DPSC) and stem cells from human exfoliated teeth (SHED) have become stem cell source of choice for cell based regenerative therapies. We aimed to compare DPSC and SHED as stem cell sources with a future use in regeneration of calcified tissue.
Explant derived human DPSC (n=9) and SHED (n=1) were cryopreserved, thawed and expanded for analysis of population doubling time, colony forming unit assay and efficiency. A growth curve was plotted to determine population doubling time, while colony forming numbers and efficiency was determined at plating cell densities of 5.6, 11.1 and 22.2 / cm2. The isolated cells were characterized for the presence of stem cell markers by immunophenotyping and immunofluorescence staining, and tri-lineage differentiation. Statistical analysis was performed by Pearson correlation, Exponential regression and two way Anova with Tukey test at p<0.05.
DPSC and SHED exhibited spindle shaped fibroblast like morphology. SHED was found superior than DPSC in terms of proliferation and colony forming efficiency. Immunophenotypes showed that DPSC contain 62.6±26.3 %, 90.9±14.8% and 19.8±0.1%, while SHED contain 90.5%, 97.7% and 0.1% positive cells for CD90, CD73 and CD105. DPSC were strongly positive for vimentin, CD29, CD73, while reactivity was moderate to weak against CD44 and CD90. SHED expressed vimentin, CD29, CD105, CD90 and CD44. Both were negative for CD45. Upon induction, both cell types differentiated into bone, fat and cartilage like cells.
Cultured DPSC and SHED were proliferative and exhibited self-renewal property. Both DPSC and SHED expressed stem cell markers and were able to differentiate into bone, fat and cartilage like cells. Thus, these could be a suitable stem cell sources for cell based regenerative therapies.
由于牙髓干细胞(DPSC)和人脱落乳牙干细胞(SHED)具有高增殖率、多能性和自我更新能力,它们已成为基于细胞的再生疗法的首选干细胞来源。我们旨在比较DPSC和SHED作为干细胞来源在未来钙化组织再生中的应用。
将外植体来源的人DPSC(n = 9)和SHED(n = 1)进行冷冻保存、解冻并扩增,以分析群体倍增时间、集落形成单位测定和效率。绘制生长曲线以确定群体倍增时间,同时在接种细胞密度为5.6、11.1和22.2 / cm²时测定集落形成数量和效率。通过免疫表型分析、免疫荧光染色和三系分化对分离的细胞进行干细胞标志物的鉴定。采用Pearson相关性分析、指数回归分析和双向方差分析以及Tukey检验进行统计学分析,p < 0.05。
DPSC和SHED呈现出纺锤形的成纤维细胞样形态。SHED在增殖和集落形成效率方面优于DPSC。免疫表型显示,DPSC中CD90、CD73和CD105的阳性细胞分别为62.6±26.3%、90.9±14.8%和19.8±0.1%,而SHED中分别为90.5%、97.7%和0.1%。DPSC对波形蛋白、CD29、CD73呈强阳性,而对CD44和CD90的反应性为中度至弱阳性。SHED表达波形蛋白、CD29、CD105、CD90和CD44。两者对CD45均为阴性。诱导后,两种细胞类型均分化为骨、脂肪和软骨样细胞。
培养的DPSC和SHED具有增殖能力并表现出自我更新特性。DPSC和SHED均表达干细胞标志物,并能够分化为骨、脂肪和软骨样细胞。因此,它们可能是基于细胞的再生疗法的合适干细胞来源。