Mu Xiaoping, Peng Wei, Ou Yufu, Li Peifeng, Li Zhuhai, Wei Jianxun
Department of Spine Surgery, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanning, China.
Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
Heliyon. 2022 Jun 30;8(7):e09658. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09658. eCollection 2022 Jul.
In absence of uniform therapeutic recommendations, knowledge of the available treatment options for Modic changes (MCs) patients and their safety and effectiveness would be crucial and significant for clinicians and such patients.
The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review of available studies on non-surgical treatments of MCs.
We performed a systematic review of multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for the period until 31st August 2021 to search for studies on non-surgical treatments for MCs in accordance with the guidance of the Cochrane Handbook. Potential studies were screened by their titles and abstracts. The methodological quality of the included studies was independently evaluated by two authors. Final recommendations for the included interventions were developed based on grades of recommendations. The narrative format was adopted to synthesize the findings of the present work.
Fifth studies involving a total of 1147 patients were identified for this systematic review. The results of this review demonstrated that spinal manipulation has been suggested as an alternative option for patients with MCs. However, there was insufficient evidence to support that patients with MCs can benefit from the medication and wearing the rigid lumbar brace. Moreover, the rationale and safety for the use of antibiotics in such patients remain highly controversial. Low evidence revealed that exercise therapy might decrease pain intensity only for special subgroups of MCs patients.
There is not yet enough evidence to suggest that non-surgical treatments are useful for patients with MCs. Further high-quality, multicenter trials are required to validate the effectiveness of these non-surgical treatments.
在缺乏统一治疗建议的情况下,了解Modic改变(MCs)患者可用的治疗方案及其安全性和有效性,对临床医生和此类患者至关重要。
本研究旨在对MCs非手术治疗的现有研究进行系统评价。
我们按照Cochrane手册的指导,对多个电子数据库进行了系统评价,包括PubMed、科学网、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和中国知网,检索截至2021年8月31日关于MCs非手术治疗的研究。通过标题和摘要筛选潜在研究。两名作者独立评估纳入研究的方法学质量。根据推荐等级对纳入的干预措施提出最终建议。采用叙述格式综合本研究的结果。
本系统评价共纳入五项研究,涉及1147例患者。该评价结果表明,脊柱推拿已被建议作为MCs患者的一种替代选择。然而,没有足够的证据支持MCs患者能从药物治疗和佩戴硬质腰托中获益。此外,在此类患者中使用抗生素的原理和安全性仍存在很大争议。低质量证据表明,运动疗法可能仅对MCs患者的特定亚组能减轻疼痛强度。
尚无足够证据表明非手术治疗对MCs患者有用。需要进一步开展高质量、多中心试验来验证这些非手术治疗的有效性。