• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

威慑酒后驾车者:斯托克顿的经验

Deterring the drinking driver: the Stockton experience.

作者信息

Voas R B, Hause J M

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 1987 Apr;19(2):81-90. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(87)90027-3.

DOI:10.1016/0001-4575(87)90027-3
PMID:3580094
Abstract

The effectiveness of drunk driving enforcement patrols is generally assumed. However, few adequate evaluations are available in the traffic safety literature. The U.S. Department of Transportation funded a special program in Stockton, a city with a population of 120,000 in the central valley of California, to test the effectiveness of special drunk driving patrols on weekend evenings, applied within a setting in which no other major alcohol safety programs were present. The objective of this effort was to determine the effectiveness of a "traditional" approach to enforcing driving while impaired (DWI) laws; one in which innovative procedures such as sobriety checkpoints were not used. The results indicated that nighttime collisions in Stockton were reduced during the three and a half year period of the special enforcement program.

摘要

人们普遍认为酒驾执法巡逻是有效的。然而,交通安全文献中几乎没有充分的评估。美国交通部在加利福尼亚中央谷地一个拥有12万人口的城市斯托克顿资助了一个特别项目,以测试在没有其他主要酒精安全项目的情况下,周末晚上进行特别酒驾巡逻的效果。这项工作的目的是确定一种“传统”的酒后驾车(DWI)执法方法的有效性;在这种方法中,没有使用清醒检查站等创新程序。结果表明,在特别执法项目的三年半时间里,斯托克顿的夜间碰撞事故有所减少。

相似文献

1
Deterring the drinking driver: the Stockton experience.威慑酒后驾车者:斯托克顿的经验
Accid Anal Prev. 1987 Apr;19(2):81-90. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(87)90027-3.
2
Publicized sobriety checkpoint programs: a community guide systematic review.公开的清醒检查站计划:社区指南系统评价
Am J Prev Med. 2014 May;46(5):529-39. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.018.
3
Driving while intoxicated: increased deterrence or alternative transportation for the drunk driver.醉酒驾车:增强威慑力还是为醉酒司机提供替代交通方式。
J Subst Abuse. 1990;2(1):51-67. doi: 10.1016/s0899-3289(05)80045-8.
4
Low-manpower checkpoints: can they provide effective DUI enforcement in small communities?人力不足的检查站:它们能在小社区提供有效的酒驾执法吗?
Traffic Inj Prev. 2006 Sep;7(3):213-8. doi: 10.1080/15389580600696686.
5
Challenges associated with drunk driving measurement: combining police and self-reported data to estimate an accurate prevalence in Brazil.与酒驾测量相关的挑战:结合警方和自我报告数据估计巴西的准确流行率。
Injury. 2013 Dec;44 Suppl 4:S11-6. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(13)70207-9.
6
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) notes. Breath test refusals in DWI enforcement: an interim report.美国国家公路交通安全管理局(NHTSA)报告。酒驾执法中的呼气测试拒绝情况:一份中期报告。
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Dec;46(6):552-3; discussion 553-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.09.005.
7
Forfeiture programs in California: why so few?加利福尼亚州的没收计划:为何如此之少?
J Safety Res. 2002 Summer;33(2):245-58. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4375(02)00015-4.
8
Cochrane injuries group.考科蓝损伤研究小组
Inj Prev. 2004 Dec;10(6):333. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.007443.
9
A new look at NHTSA's evaluation of the 1984 Charlottesville Sobriety Checkpoint Program: implications for current checkpoint issues.对美国国家公路交通安全管理局(NHTSA)对1984年夏洛茨维尔清醒检查站计划评估的新审视:对当前检查站问题的启示。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2008 Mar;9(1):22-30. doi: 10.1080/15389580701682114.
10
Sobriety checkpoints: evidence of effectiveness is strong, but use is limited.清醒度检查站:有效性证据确凿,但应用有限。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2004 Sep;5(3):220-7. doi: 10.1080/15389580490465247.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Using Computer Models to Predict Prevention Policy Outcomes.使用计算机模型预测预防政策结果。
Alcohol Health Res World. 1996;20(4):252-260.
3
Replication of a Controlled Community Prevention Trial: Results From a Local Implementation of Science-Based Intervention to Reduce Impaired Driving.一项社区预防对照试验的复制:基于科学的减少酒后驾车干预措施在当地实施的结果。
J Prim Prev. 2018 Feb;39(1):47-58. doi: 10.1007/s10935-017-0499-y.
4
Drinking and driving in the United States: comparing results from the 2007 and 1996 National Roadside Surveys.美国的酒后驾车问题:2007 年与 1996 年全国路边调查结果比较。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(2):117-26. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.697229.
5
Preventing impaired driving opportunities and problems.预防酒后驾车的机会和问题。
Alcohol Res Health. 2011;34(2):225-35.
6
Levels and types of alcohol biomarkers in DUI and clinic samples for estimating workplace alcohol problems.酒驾和临床样本中的酒精生物标志物水平和类型,用于评估工作场所的酒精问题。
Drug Test Anal. 2012 Feb;4(2):76-82. doi: 10.1002/dta.384. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
7
An empirical approach to selecting community-based alcohol interventions: combining research evidence, rural community views and professional opinion.基于实证的社区酒精干预措施选择方法:综合研究证据、农村社区意见和专业意见。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 10;12:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-25.
8
First-time DWI offenders are at risk of recidivating regardless of sanctions imposed.初次酒后驾车违法者无论受到何种制裁,都有再次犯罪的风险。
J Crim Justice. 2011 Mar;39(2):137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.01.001.
9
Risk of alcohol-impaired driving recidivism among first offenders and multiple offenders.初犯和多次违法者的酒后驾驶再犯风险。
Am J Public Health. 2010 May;100(5):919-24. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.154575. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
10
Validity of surrogate measures of alcohol involvement when applied to nonfatal crashes.将酒精参与的替代指标应用于非致命撞车事故时的有效性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2009 May;41(3):522-30. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.02.004. Epub 2009 Feb 24.