• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据年龄比较口服硫酸盐片和聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的疗效和安全性。

Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 8;101(27):e29884. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029884.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000029884
PMID:35801801
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9259131/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, a novel oral sulfate tablet (OST) has been introduced for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. However, whether elderly patients can take OST is not yet clear, as OST consists of 28 tablets. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of OST and polyethylene glycol (PEG) for bowel preparation for colonoscopy according to age.

METHODS

We randomly divided subjects into an OST group and a PEG group and compared Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS), bubble score, patient compliance and satisfaction, and safety between the 2 groups according to age (under 65 years of age vs 65 years of age and older).

RESULTS

Among the 179 participants, 61 were 65 years of age and older. The BBPS and bubble score of the OST group were better than that of the PEG group, regardless of age. The satisfaction of the OST group was better than that of the PEG group, regardless of age. The compliance was not different between the 2 groups; however, the OST group under 65 years of age had a higher rate of completing the dose within 2 hours compared with the PEG group under 65 years of age. Adverse events including abdominal distension, abdominal pain, nausea, or vomiting were not different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of OST for bowel preparation before colonoscopy is as effective and safe as PEG, and these results were consistent in elderly people 65 years of age and older.

摘要

背景

最近,一种新型口服硫酸盐片(OST)已被用于结肠镜检查前的肠道准备。然而,老年人是否可以服用 OST 尚不清楚,因为 OST 由 28 片组成。我们旨在根据年龄比较 OST 和聚乙二醇(PEG)在结肠镜检查肠道准备中的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们将受试者随机分为 OST 组和 PEG 组,并根据年龄(<65 岁与≥65 岁)比较两组之间波士顿肠道准备评分(BBPS)、气泡评分、患者依从性和满意度以及安全性。

结果

在 179 名参与者中,有 61 名年龄在 65 岁及以上。无论年龄大小,OST 组的 BBPS 和气泡评分均优于 PEG 组。无论年龄大小,OST 组的满意度均优于 PEG 组。两组之间的依从性没有差异;然而,<65 岁的 OST 组完成 2 小时内剂量的比例高于<65 岁的 PEG 组。两组之间不良反应(包括腹胀、腹痛、恶心或呕吐)无差异。

结论

OST 用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备与 PEG 一样有效且安全,这些结果在 65 岁及以上的老年人中是一致的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a111/9259131/79bdca57632b/medi-101-e29884-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a111/9259131/0678abac1d18/medi-101-e29884-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a111/9259131/79bdca57632b/medi-101-e29884-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a111/9259131/0678abac1d18/medi-101-e29884-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a111/9259131/79bdca57632b/medi-101-e29884-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age.根据年龄比较口服硫酸盐片和聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的疗效和安全性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 8;101(27):e29884. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029884.
2
Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablet versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients: prospective, multicenter, investigator single-blinded, randomized study.口服硫酸盐片与 2 L 聚乙二醇/抗坏血酸在老年患者肠道准备中的疗效、耐受性和安全性:前瞻性、多中心、研究者单盲、随机研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2024 May;59(5):402-410. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02089-9. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
3
A Safety and Efficacy Comparison of a New Sulfate-Based Tablet Bowel Preparation Versus a PEG and Ascorbate Comparator in Adult Subjects Undergoing Colonoscopy.一种新型硫酸盐片剂肠道准备与 PEG 和抗坏血酸盐对照剂在接受结肠镜检查的成年受试者中的安全性和疗效比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 1;116(2):319-328. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001020.
4
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral sulphate tablet for bowel preparation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A multicentre randomized controlled study.口服硫酸盐片用于炎症性肠病患者肠道准备的有效性、安全性和耐受性:一项多中心随机对照研究。
J Crohns Colitis. 2022 Nov 23;16(11):1706-1713. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac080.
5
Efficacy and safety of oral sodium sulfate tablet compared with 1-L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate: a prospective, randomized, endoscopist-blinded trial.口服硫酸钠片与 1 升聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸的疗效和安全性比较:一项前瞻性、随机、内镜医师盲法试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Dec;38(12):2090-2096. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16343. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
6
Efficacy of oral sulfate tablets for bowel preparation and adenoma detection rate.口服硫酸片剂用于肠道准备及腺瘤检出率的疗效
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Mar;38(3):410-415. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16079. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
7
Taking Oral Sulfate Tablets with Simethicone for Bowel Preparation Leads to Higher Adenoma Detection Rate than Polyethylene Glycol: A Propensity Score Analysis.服用含西甲硅油的口服硫酸盐片进行肠道准备比服用聚乙二醇导致更高的腺瘤检出率:一项倾向评分分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Mar;68(3):867-876. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07611-8. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
8
Efficacy and safety of oral sulfate tablet vs. polyethylene glycol and ascorbate for bowel preparation in children.口服硫酸片剂与聚乙二醇和抗坏血酸盐用于儿童肠道准备的疗效和安全性比较
Front Pediatr. 2024 Feb 8;12:1277083. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1277083. eCollection 2024.
9
Randomized controlled trial of sodium phosphate tablets vs polyethylene glycol solution for colonoscopy bowel cleansing.磷酸钠片与聚乙二醇溶液用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的随机对照试验
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 14;20(42):15845-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15845.
10
Efficacy and safety of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in elderly: comparison with oral sulfate solution.1L 聚乙二醇联合维生素 C 在老年患者肠道准备中的疗效和安全性:与口服硫酸镁溶液的比较。
Korean J Intern Med. 2023 Sep;38(5):651-660. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.030. Epub 2023 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.口服硫酸溶液与聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
DEN Open. 2025 Apr 16;5(1):e70113. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70113. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Efficacy of Oral Sulfate Tablet and 2 L-Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized KASID Multicenter Trial.口服硫酸片剂和含抗坏血酸的2L聚乙二醇用于肠道准备的疗效:一项前瞻性随机KASID多中心试验。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Dec 16;39(48):e301. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e301.
3
Comparison of L L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid and Oral Sodium Sulfate Tablets for Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation.
聚乙二醇加维生素C与口服硫酸钠片用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 9;13(23):7493. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237493.
4
Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablet versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients: prospective, multicenter, investigator single-blinded, randomized study.口服硫酸盐片与 2 L 聚乙二醇/抗坏血酸在老年患者肠道准备中的疗效、耐受性和安全性:前瞻性、多中心、研究者单盲、随机研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2024 May;59(5):402-410. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02089-9. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
5
Comparison of a novel mini-oral sulfate tablet and the conventional oral sulfate tablet in bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, non-inferior, phase 3 trial.新型口服硫酸片与传统口服硫酸片用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、研究者设盲、多中心、非劣效性3期试验。
J Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov;58(11):1114-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00535-023-02023-5. Epub 2023 Aug 5.