Suppr超能文献

聚乙二醇加维生素C与口服硫酸钠片用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较

Comparison of L L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid and Oral Sodium Sulfate Tablets for Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation.

作者信息

Park Jin Hwa, Kim Minjun, Hong Seung Wook, Hwang Sung Wook, Park Sang Hyoung, Yang Dong-Hoon, Ye Byong Duk, Myung Seung-Jae, Yang Suk-Kyun, Byeon Jeong-Sik

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Hanyang College of Medicine, 222-1, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea.

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 9;13(23):7493. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237493.

Abstract

A low-volume (1 L) polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (PEG-A) solution and an oral sodium sulfate tablet (OST) formulation are recently introduced agents for colonoscopy bowel preparation. This study investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 1 L PEG-A vs. OST. This single-center, prospective, randomized, endoscopist-blinded study randomly assigned patients into 2 groups: 1 L PEG-A (group A); and OST (group B). Efficacy of bowel preparation was evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Tolerability and safety were investigated with a standardized questionnaire. A total of 174 patients were included in the final analysis (group A, n = 92; group B, n = 82). Successful bowel preparation was achieved in 91.3% and 95.1% of patients in groups A and B, respectively ( = 0.324). Overall mean satisfaction with bowel preparation was greater among those in group B vs. those in group A (8.2 ± 1.7 vs. 6.8 ± 2.0, respectively; < 0.001). Although abdominal distension was less common in group A than group B (3/92 [3.3%] vs. 9/82 [11.0%], respectively; = 0.045), overall adverse events developed similarly in both groups (27/92 [29.3%] vs. 21/82 [25.6%], = 0.583). In subgroup analysis of older patients (≥65 years of age), efficacy, overall satisfaction, and safety profiles were not different between groups A and B. Both 1 L PEG-A and OST demonstrated efficacy, tolerability, and safety for colonoscopy bowel preparation. OST was slightly better tolerated, whereas 1 L PEG-A resulted in less abdominal distension. Both agents were effective and safe in older patients.

摘要

一种小容量(1升)的聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸(PEG-A)溶液和口服硫酸钠片(OST)制剂是最近推出的用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的药物。本研究调查了1升PEG-A与OST的疗效、安全性和耐受性。这项单中心、前瞻性、随机、内镜医师盲法研究将患者随机分为两组:1升PEG-A组(A组);和OST组(B组)。使用波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评估肠道准备的疗效。通过标准化问卷调查耐受性和安全性。最终分析共纳入174例患者(A组,n = 92;B组,n = 82)。A组和B组分别有91.3%和95.1%的患者成功完成肠道准备(P = 0.324)。B组患者对肠道准备的总体平均满意度高于A组(分别为8.2±1.7和6.8±2.0;P < 0.001)。虽然A组腹胀的发生率低于B组(分别为3/92 [3.3%]和9/82 [11.0%];P = 0.045),但两组总体不良事件的发生情况相似(27/92 [29.3%]和21/82 [25.6%],P = 0.583)。在老年患者(≥65岁)的亚组分析中,A组和B组在疗效、总体满意度和安全性方面无差异。1升PEG-A和OST在结肠镜检查肠道准备中均显示出疗效、耐受性和安全性。OST的耐受性稍好,而1升PEG-A导致的腹胀较少。两种药物在老年患者中均有效且安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e23d/11642427/4130d3ad0c60/jcm-13-07493-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验