• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚乙二醇加维生素C与口服硫酸钠片用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较

Comparison of L L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid and Oral Sodium Sulfate Tablets for Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation.

作者信息

Park Jin Hwa, Kim Minjun, Hong Seung Wook, Hwang Sung Wook, Park Sang Hyoung, Yang Dong-Hoon, Ye Byong Duk, Myung Seung-Jae, Yang Suk-Kyun, Byeon Jeong-Sik

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Hanyang College of Medicine, 222-1, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea.

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 9;13(23):7493. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237493.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13237493
PMID:39685949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11642427/
Abstract

A low-volume (1 L) polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (PEG-A) solution and an oral sodium sulfate tablet (OST) formulation are recently introduced agents for colonoscopy bowel preparation. This study investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 1 L PEG-A vs. OST. This single-center, prospective, randomized, endoscopist-blinded study randomly assigned patients into 2 groups: 1 L PEG-A (group A); and OST (group B). Efficacy of bowel preparation was evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Tolerability and safety were investigated with a standardized questionnaire. A total of 174 patients were included in the final analysis (group A, n = 92; group B, n = 82). Successful bowel preparation was achieved in 91.3% and 95.1% of patients in groups A and B, respectively ( = 0.324). Overall mean satisfaction with bowel preparation was greater among those in group B vs. those in group A (8.2 ± 1.7 vs. 6.8 ± 2.0, respectively; < 0.001). Although abdominal distension was less common in group A than group B (3/92 [3.3%] vs. 9/82 [11.0%], respectively; = 0.045), overall adverse events developed similarly in both groups (27/92 [29.3%] vs. 21/82 [25.6%], = 0.583). In subgroup analysis of older patients (≥65 years of age), efficacy, overall satisfaction, and safety profiles were not different between groups A and B. Both 1 L PEG-A and OST demonstrated efficacy, tolerability, and safety for colonoscopy bowel preparation. OST was slightly better tolerated, whereas 1 L PEG-A resulted in less abdominal distension. Both agents were effective and safe in older patients.

摘要

一种小容量(1升)的聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸(PEG-A)溶液和口服硫酸钠片(OST)制剂是最近推出的用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的药物。本研究调查了1升PEG-A与OST的疗效、安全性和耐受性。这项单中心、前瞻性、随机、内镜医师盲法研究将患者随机分为两组:1升PEG-A组(A组);和OST组(B组)。使用波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评估肠道准备的疗效。通过标准化问卷调查耐受性和安全性。最终分析共纳入174例患者(A组,n = 92;B组,n = 82)。A组和B组分别有91.3%和95.1%的患者成功完成肠道准备(P = 0.324)。B组患者对肠道准备的总体平均满意度高于A组(分别为8.2±1.7和6.8±2.0;P < 0.001)。虽然A组腹胀的发生率低于B组(分别为3/92 [3.3%]和9/82 [11.0%];P = 0.045),但两组总体不良事件的发生情况相似(27/92 [29.3%]和21/82 [25.6%],P = 0.583)。在老年患者(≥65岁)的亚组分析中,A组和B组在疗效、总体满意度和安全性方面无差异。1升PEG-A和OST在结肠镜检查肠道准备中均显示出疗效、耐受性和安全性。OST的耐受性稍好,而1升PEG-A导致的腹胀较少。两种药物在老年患者中均有效且安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e23d/11642427/b134697a039b/jcm-13-07493-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e23d/11642427/4130d3ad0c60/jcm-13-07493-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e23d/11642427/b134697a039b/jcm-13-07493-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e23d/11642427/4130d3ad0c60/jcm-13-07493-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e23d/11642427/b134697a039b/jcm-13-07493-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of L L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid and Oral Sodium Sulfate Tablets for Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation.聚乙二醇加维生素C与口服硫酸钠片用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 9;13(23):7493. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237493.
2
Efficacy and safety of oral sodium sulfate tablet compared with 1-L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate: a prospective, randomized, endoscopist-blinded trial.口服硫酸钠片与 1 升聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸的疗效和安全性比较:一项前瞻性、随机、内镜医师盲法试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Dec;38(12):2090-2096. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16343. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
3
Efficacy of Oral Sulfate Tablet and 2 L-Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized KASID Multicenter Trial.口服硫酸片剂和含抗坏血酸的2L聚乙二醇用于肠道准备的疗效:一项前瞻性随机KASID多中心试验。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Dec 16;39(48):e301. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e301.
4
Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablet versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients: prospective, multicenter, investigator single-blinded, randomized study.口服硫酸盐片与 2 L 聚乙二醇/抗坏血酸在老年患者肠道准备中的疗效、耐受性和安全性:前瞻性、多中心、研究者单盲、随机研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2024 May;59(5):402-410. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02089-9. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
5
Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age.根据年龄比较口服硫酸盐片和聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的疗效和安全性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 8;101(27):e29884. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029884.
6
Acute Gastropathy Associated with Bowel Preparation According to Age: Oral Sulfate Tablets versus 1-L Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid.根据年龄与肠道准备相关的急性胃病:口服硫酸盐片与含维生素 C 的 1L 聚乙二醇。
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 25;84(4):177-187. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2024.094.
7
Comparison of a split-dose bowel preparation with 2 liters of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and 1 liter of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and bisacodyl before colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前,对比 2 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 与 1 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 和比沙可啶的分剂量肠道准备。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug;86(2):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.040. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
8
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral sulphate tablet for bowel preparation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A multicentre randomized controlled study.口服硫酸盐片用于炎症性肠病患者肠道准备的有效性、安全性和耐受性:一项多中心随机对照研究。
J Crohns Colitis. 2022 Nov 23;16(11):1706-1713. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac080.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid with senna versus 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for colonoscopic bowel preparation: Prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial.1 L 聚乙二醇加维生素 C 与番泻叶对比 2 L 聚乙二醇加维生素 C 用于结肠镜肠道准备的疗效和耐受性:前瞻性、随机、研究者盲法试验。
Dig Endosc. 2023 Sep;35(6):767-776. doi: 10.1111/den.14504. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
10
Evaluation of the efficacy of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and an oral sodium sulfate solution: A multi-center, prospective randomized controlled trial.评价 1L 聚乙二醇加维生素 C 和口服硫酸钠溶液的疗效:一项多中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 2;101(35):e30355. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030355.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age.根据年龄比较口服硫酸盐片和聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的疗效和安全性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 8;101(27):e29884. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029884.
2
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Strategies to Improve Quality of Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy: Expert Review.AGA 临床实践更新:改善筛查和监测结肠镜检查质量的策略:专家综述。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Aug;161(2):701-711. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.05.041.
3
A Safety and Efficacy Comparison of a New Sulfate-Based Tablet Bowel Preparation Versus a PEG and Ascorbate Comparator in Adult Subjects Undergoing Colonoscopy.
一种新型硫酸盐片剂肠道准备与 PEG 和抗坏血酸盐对照剂在接受结肠镜检查的成年受试者中的安全性和疗效比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 1;116(2):319-328. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001020.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Low-Volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution on the Day before and Split-Dose Regimens (SEE SAFE) Study.老年患者低容量准备的安全性和有效性:口服硫酸盐溶液在检查日的前一天和分剂量方案(SEE SAFE)研究。
Gut Liver. 2019 Mar 15;13(2):176-182. doi: 10.5009/gnl18214.
5
Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized phase 3 trial.使用 1 L NER1006 与聚乙二醇电解质散和柠檬酸镁对比的肠道清洁效果和安全性:一项随机 3 期试验。
Endoscopy. 2019 Jan;51(1):73-84. doi: 10.1055/a-0639-5070. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
6
Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus 2 L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate: a randomized phase 3 trial.1 L NER1006 与 2 L 聚乙二醇+抗坏血酸相比的结肠清洁效果和安全性:一项随机 3 期试验。
Endoscopy. 2019 Jan;51(1):60-72. doi: 10.1055/a-0638-8125. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
7
Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid and an Oral Sulfate Solution in a Split Method for Bowel Preparation: A Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Clinical Trial.聚乙二醇联合抗坏血酸与口服硫酸盐溶液分阶段肠道准备效果的比较评估:一项随机、多中心III期临床试验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Apr;60(4):426-432. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000759.
8
Randomized trial comparing oral sulfate solution with 4-L polyethylene glycol administered in a split dose as preparation for colonoscopy.比较口服硫酸溶液与分剂量服用4升聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查准备的随机试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;32(1):12-18. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13477.
9
Determinants of Bowel Preparation Quality and Its Association With Adenoma Detection: A Prospective Colonoscopy Study.肠道准备质量的决定因素及其与腺瘤检出的关联:一项前瞻性结肠镜检查研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan;95(2):e2251. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002251.
10
Randomized controlled trial of sodium phosphate tablets vs polyethylene glycol solution for colonoscopy bowel cleansing.磷酸钠片与聚乙二醇溶液用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的随机对照试验
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 14;20(42):15845-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15845.