Smits Marleen, Hopstaken Rogier, Terhaag Lusan, de Kort Gijs, Giesen Paul
Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, P.O Box 9101, 160 IQ healthcare, HB, 6500, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Star-shl Diagnostic Centers, Etten-Leur, the Netherlands.
BMC Nurs. 2022 Jul 8;21(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00969-0.
Point-of-care testing (POCT) is increasingly used in primary care. The rapid availability of the test result during the patient encounter increases the potential for patients and care providers to make a direct and joint decision on disease management. Our aim was to get insight into the first experiences of patients and healthcare professionals after introducing quality-controlled HbA1c and professional glucose POCT in diabetes care in their own general practices.
A cross-sectional observational study using paper questionnaires for patients, nurses and general practitioners (GPs) in 13 general practices in the Netherlands. HbA1c and professional glucose POCT was introduced after training and under day-to-day quality control. Patients filled in the questionnaire immediately after the test; nurses and GPs after a minimum period of three months from the starting date. Descriptive data analyses were performed.
A total of 1551 fingerstick blood POC tests were performed (1126 HbA1c; 425 Glucose). For HbA1c POCT, 84 patients, 29 nurses and 11 GPs filled in the questionnaires. For professional glucose POCT, 30 patients, 17 nurses and 8 GPs responded. Response rates varied between 24 and 56%. Patients, nurses and GPs were generally (very) satisfied with the novel POC tests. Patients were most positive about the location (in the GPs' office) and execution of the POC test (by their own nurse), and the speed of the test result. Almost all nurses indicated to have sufficient knowledge and skills to perform the test. Both nurses and GPs had confidence in the test results and indicated they experienced a higher patient satisfaction than with regular blood tests. Perceived disadvantages were the time required to regularly calibrate the devices and the extension of the consultation time because of the test. Patients, nurses and GPs generally expressed they wanted to continue performing these POC tests in routine diabetes care.
Patients, nurses and GPs expressed (very) positive first experiences after introducing HbA1c and professional glucose testing on two high-quality POCT devices in their own general practices. Further research, with a random selection procedure of practices and patients and in other regions and countries, is recommended to confirm these findings.
即时检验(POCT)在基层医疗中使用得越来越多。在患者就诊期间快速获得检测结果增加了患者和医护人员就疾病管理做出直接共同决策的可能性。我们的目的是深入了解在他们自己的全科医疗中引入质量控制的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和专业血糖POCT用于糖尿病护理后,患者和医护人员的初步体验。
在荷兰的13家全科医疗中,采用纸质问卷对患者、护士和全科医生(GP)进行横断面观察性研究。在培训后并在日常质量控制下引入HbA1c和专业血糖POCT。患者在检测后立即填写问卷;护士和全科医生从开始日期起至少三个月后填写。进行描述性数据分析。
共进行了1551次指尖血POCT检测(1126次HbA1c检测;425次血糖检测)。对于HbA1c POCT,84名患者、29名护士和11名全科医生填写了问卷。对于专业血糖POCT,30名患者、17名护士和8名全科医生做出了回应。回复率在24%至56%之间。患者、护士和全科医生总体上(非常)满意这种新型POCT检测。患者对检测地点(在全科医生办公室)、POCT检测的执行人员(由他们自己的护士)以及检测结果的速度最为满意。几乎所有护士都表示有足够的知识和技能进行检测。护士和全科医生都对检测结果有信心,并表示他们体验到患者满意度比常规血液检测更高。察觉到的缺点是定期校准设备所需的时间以及由于检测导致咨询时间延长。患者、护士和全科医生普遍表示他们希望在常规糖尿病护理中继续进行这些POCT检测。
在他们自己的全科医疗中,在两种高质量POCT设备上引入HbA1c和专业血糖检测后,患者、护士和全科医生表达了(非常)积极的初步体验。建议进行进一步研究,采用随机选择医疗单位和患者的程序,并在其他地区和国家进行,以证实这些发现。