• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体间社会比较在促进水资源保护中的应用:来自中国一项调查实验的证据。

The Use of Intergroup Social Comparison in Promoting Water Conservation: Evidence from a Survey Experiment in China.

机构信息

Institute of Governance, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China.

School of Politics and Public Administration, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 24;19(13):7749. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137749.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19137749
PMID:35805408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9265829/
Abstract

This study examines the effect of the intergroup social comparison approach in promoting water conservation. In an online survey experiment, participants first encountered normative persuasive messages, informative persuasive messages, or intergroup social comparison messages and then reported their willingness to conserve water, prior water usage, and demographic information. Results showed a significantly higher willingness to conserve water in the intergroup social comparison condition compared to other conditions. We further investigated whether this social comparison effect was moderated by prior water usage and the strength of comparison. Results suggest that prior water usage, rather than the strength of comparison, moderated the influence of intergroup social comparison. Moreover, the moderating effect of prior water usage only works when participants receive a low level of strength of comparison.

摘要

本研究考察了群体间社会比较方法对促进节水的影响。在一项在线调查实验中,参与者首先接触到规范性说服信息、信息性说服信息或群体间社会比较信息,然后报告他们的节水意愿、先前的用水量和人口统计信息。结果表明,与其他条件相比,群体间社会比较条件下的节水意愿显著更高。我们进一步研究了这种社会比较效应是否受到先前用水量和比较强度的调节。结果表明,先前用水量而不是比较强度调节了群体间社会比较的影响。此外,先前用水量的调节作用仅在参与者接收到低水平的比较强度时才起作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0277/9265829/700833026e75/ijerph-19-07749-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0277/9265829/f0dd473450dc/ijerph-19-07749-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0277/9265829/700833026e75/ijerph-19-07749-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0277/9265829/f0dd473450dc/ijerph-19-07749-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0277/9265829/700833026e75/ijerph-19-07749-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Use of Intergroup Social Comparison in Promoting Water Conservation: Evidence from a Survey Experiment in China.群体间社会比较在促进水资源保护中的应用:来自中国一项调查实验的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 24;19(13):7749. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137749.
2
Normative social influence is underdetected.规范性社会影响未被充分察觉。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jul;34(7):913-23. doi: 10.1177/0146167208316691.
3
Promoting Water Conservation Based on the Matching Effect of Regulatory Focus and Emotion.基于调节焦点和情绪匹配效应的节水推广
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 9;18(4):1680. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041680.
4
The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms.社会规范的建构力、破坏力和重建力。
Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):429-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x.
5
Can Hotel Companies' Water Conservation Management and Waste Reduction Measures Influence Hotel Customers' Willingness to Pay More and Intention to Revisit?酒店公司的节水管理和减少浪费措施能否影响酒店顾客的支付意愿和重游意愿?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 27;18(17):9054. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179054.
6
The effects of health narratives: Examining the moderating role of persuasive intent.健康叙事的效果:审视说服意图的调节作用。
Health Mark Q. 2019 Apr-Jun;36(2):120-135. doi: 10.1080/07359683.2019.1575061. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
7
Responses to persuasive messages encouraging professional help seeking for depression: comparison between individuals with and without psychological distress.对鼓励寻求抑郁专业帮助的说服性信息的反应:有和无心理困扰个体之间的比较。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2019 May 8;24(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12199-019-0786-8.
8
How effective are messages and their characteristics in changing behavioural intentions to substitute plant-based foods for red meat? The mediating role of prior beliefs.信息及其特征在改变用植物性食物替代红色肉类的行为意向方面的效果如何?先验信念的中介作用。
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:217-224. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
9
Partisans' receptivity to persuasive messaging is undiminished by countervailing party leader cues.党派人士对有说服力的信息的接受度不会因对立党派领导人的暗示而降低。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Apr;7(4):568-582. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01551-7. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
10
Preadolescent Students' Engagement With an mHealth Intervention Fostering Social Comparison for Health Behavior Change: Crossover Experimental Study.青春期前学生参与促进健康行为改变的移动健康干预措施中的社会比较:交叉实验研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 29;23(7):e21202. doi: 10.2196/21202.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing domestic water conservation behaviour: A review of empirical studies on influencing tactics.增强国内节水行为:影响策略的实证研究综述。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Oct 1;247:867-876. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.126. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
2
An experimental test of voluntary strategies to promote urban water demand management.促进城市需水管理的自愿策略的实验测试。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Jan 15;114:343-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.027. Epub 2012 Nov 17.
3
Collective self and individual choice: the effects of inter-group comparative context on environmental values and behaviour.
集体自我与个体选择:群际比较情境对环境价值观和行为的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2012 Dec;51(4):551-69. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02022.x. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
4
Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification.群体层面的自我定义与自我投入:内群体认同的层级(多成分)模型
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jul;95(1):144-65. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144.
5
The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms.社会规范的建构力、破坏力和重建力。
Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):429-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x.
6
Reaction in action: intergroup contrast in automatic behavior.行动中的反应:自动行为中的群体间对比
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 May;30(5):605-16. doi: 10.1177/0146167203262087.
7
What a coincidence! The effects of incidental similarity on compliance.多么巧合啊!偶然相似性对依从性的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Jan;30(1):35-43. doi: 10.1177/0146167203258838.