Qiu Haonan, Yang Shihong, Jiang Zewei, Xu Yi, Jiao Xiyun
College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China.
State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China.
Plants (Basel). 2022 Jun 26;11(13):1690. doi: 10.3390/plants11131690.
Irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer application are two important factors affecting yield and nitrogen loss in rice fields; however, the interaction effects of different irrigation schedules and combined management of nitrogen fertilizer application on yield and nitrogen loss in rice fields remain unknown. Therefore, we collected 327 sets of data on rice yield and 437 sets of data on nitrogen loss in rice fields from 2000 to 2021 and investigated the effects of different water-saving irrigation schedules, nitrogen application levels, and water-nitrogen couplings on rice yield, nitrogen use efficiency, and nitrogen loss (NO emissions, nitrogen runoff, nitrogen leaching, and ammonia volatilization) by meta-analysis using conventional flooding irrigation and no nitrogen treatment as controls. The results showed that alternate wet and dry irrigation and controlled irrigation had increasing effects on rice yield. Alternate wet and dry irrigation had a significant yield-increasing effect (average 2.57% increase) and dry cultivation significantly reduced rice yield with an average 21.25% yield reduction. Water-saving irrigation reduces nitrogen runoff and leaching losses from rice fields but increases NO emissions, and alternate wet and dry irrigation has a significant effect on increasing NO emissions, with an average increase of 67.77%. Most water-saving irrigation can increase nitrogen use efficiency. Among water-saving irrigation methods, the effect of controlled irrigation on increasing nitrogen use efficiency is 1.06%. Rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency both showed a trend of increasing then decreasing with nitrogen fertilizer application, and nitrogen loss gradually increased with the amount of nitrogen fertilizer input. Water-nitrogen coupling management can significantly reduce nitrogen loss in rice fields while saving water and increasing yield. Based on the analysis of the data in this study, when the irrigation amount was 300350 mm and the nitrogen application amount was 200250 kg/ha, the rice yield and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency were at a high level, which corresponded to the irrigation schedule of controlled irrigation or alternating wet and dry irrigation in the literature. However, different rice-growing areas are affected by rainfall and land capability, etc. Further optimization and correction of the adapted water and fertilizer management system for paddy fields are needed. The optimal water-nitrogen pattern of this study can achieve high rice yield and reduce nitrogen loss.
灌溉和氮肥施用是影响稻田产量和氮素损失的两个重要因素;然而,不同灌溉制度与氮肥综合管理对稻田产量和氮素损失的交互作用尚不清楚。因此,我们收集了2000年至2021年327组稻田水稻产量数据和437组稻田氮素损失数据,以常规淹灌和不施氮处理为对照,通过荟萃分析研究了不同节水灌溉制度、施氮水平和水氮耦合对水稻产量、氮素利用效率和氮素损失(NO排放、氮径流、氮淋溶和氨挥发)的影响。结果表明,干湿交替灌溉和控制灌溉对水稻产量有增产作用。干湿交替灌溉有显著的增产效果(平均增产2.57%),旱作显著降低水稻产量,平均减产21.25%。节水灌溉减少了稻田的氮径流和淋溶损失,但增加了NO排放,干湿交替灌溉对增加NO排放有显著影响,平均增加67.77%。大多数节水灌溉可提高氮素利用效率。在节水灌溉方法中,控制灌溉提高氮素利用效率的效果为1.06%。水稻产量和氮素利用效率均随氮肥施用量呈现先增加后降低的趋势,氮素损失随氮肥投入量逐渐增加。水氮耦合管理在节水增产的同时可显著降低稻田氮素损失。基于本研究数据分析,当灌水量为300350 mm、施氮量为200250 kg/ha时,水稻产量和氮肥利用效率处于较高水平,这与文献中控制灌溉或干湿交替灌溉的灌溉制度相对应。然而,不同水稻种植区受降雨和土地条件等影响,需要进一步优化和校正适合稻田的水肥管理体系。本研究的最优水氮模式可实现水稻高产并减少氮素损失。