• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于MRI的临床和影像组学特征鉴别卵巢实性良恶性肿瘤

Discriminating Between Benign and Malignant Solid Ovarian Tumors Based on Clinical and Radiomic Features of MRI.

作者信息

Zheng Yuemei, Wang Hong, Li Qiong, Sun Haoran, Guo Li

机构信息

School of Medical Imaging, Tianjin Medical University, No. 1 Guangdong Road, Tianjin 300203, China.

Department of Radiology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2023 May;30(5):814-822. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2022.06.007
PMID:35810066
Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a combined model integrating clinical and radiomic features to non-invasive discriminate between the benign and malignant solid ovarian tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 148 patients with 156 solid ovarian tumors (86 benign and 70 malignant tumors) were included in this study. The dataset was split into the training and the test set with a ratio of 8:2 using stratified random sampling. 12 clinical features and 1612 radiomic features were extracted from each tumor. These features were selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso). Three classification models were built using extreme gradient boosting (XGB) algorithm: clinical model, radiomic model, combined model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision and sensitivity were analyzed to evaluate the performance of these models.

RESULTS

All of the three models obtained good performances in differentiating benign with malignant solid ovarian tumors in both training and test sets. The AUC, accuracy, precision, sensitivity of clinical model and radiomic model in test set were 0.847 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.707-0.986, p <0.01), 0.774, 0.769, 0.714, and 0.807 (95%CI, 0.652-0.961, p <0.05), 0.677, 0.643, 0.643, respectively. Combined model had the best prediction results, the AUC, accuracy, precision and sensitivity were 0.954 (95%CI, 0.862-1.0, p <0.01), 0.839, 0.909 and 0.714 in test set.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics based on machine learning can be helpful for radiologists in differentiating the benign and malignant solid ovarian tumors.

摘要

原理与目的

开发并验证一种整合临床和影像组学特征的联合模型,用于无创鉴别卵巢实性肿瘤的良恶性。

材料与方法

本研究共纳入148例患有156个卵巢实性肿瘤的患者(86个良性肿瘤和70个恶性肿瘤)。使用分层随机抽样将数据集按8:2的比例分为训练集和测试集。从每个肿瘤中提取12个临床特征和1612个影像组学特征。这些特征通过最小绝对收缩和选择算子(Lasso)进行选择。使用极端梯度提升(XGB)算法构建了三个分类模型:临床模型、影像组学模型、联合模型。分析受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积、准确性、精确性和敏感性,以评估这些模型的性能。

结果

在训练集和测试集中,这三个模型在鉴别卵巢实性肿瘤的良恶性方面均表现良好。测试集中临床模型和影像组学模型的AUC、准确性、精确性、敏感性分别为0.847(95%置信区间(CI),0.707 - 0.986,p <0.01)、0.774、0.769、0.714,以及0.807(95%CI,0.652 - 0.961,p <0.05)、0.677、0.643、0.643。联合模型具有最佳预测结果,测试集中的AUC、准确性、精确性和敏感性分别为0.954(95%CI,0.862 - 1.0,p <0.01)、0.839、0.909和0.714。

结论

基于机器学习的影像组学有助于放射科医生鉴别卵巢实性肿瘤的良恶性。

相似文献

1
Discriminating Between Benign and Malignant Solid Ovarian Tumors Based on Clinical and Radiomic Features of MRI.基于MRI的临床和影像组学特征鉴别卵巢实性良恶性肿瘤
Acad Radiol. 2023 May;30(5):814-822. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
2
Ultrasound-based deep learning radiomics model for differentiating benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumours: a multi-class classification exploratory study.基于超声的深度学习放射组学模型用于鉴别良性、交界性和恶性卵巢肿瘤:多分类分类探索性研究。
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Apr 15;24(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01251-2.
3
Radiomics analysis of ultrasound images to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid morphology on ultrasound.超声图像的放射组学分析用于鉴别超声检查中具有实性形态的附件区良恶性肿块。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Mar;65(3):353-363. doi: 10.1002/uog.27680. Epub 2025 Feb 2.
4
Development and evaluation of machine learning models based on X-ray radiomics for the classification and differentiation of malignant and benign bone tumors.基于 X 射线放射组学的机器学习模型的开发和评估,用于良恶性骨肿瘤的分类和鉴别。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Sep;32(9):6247-6257. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08764-w. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
5
Epithelial salivary gland tumors: Utility of radiomics analysis based on diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiation of benign from malignant tumors.上皮性唾液腺肿瘤:基于扩散加权成像的影像组学分析在良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的应用。
J Xray Sci Technol. 2020;28(4):799-808. doi: 10.3233/XST-190632.
6
MRI-based radiomics analysis for differentiating phyllodes tumors of the breast from fibroadenomas.基于 MRI 的放射组学分析在鉴别乳腺叶状肿瘤与纤维腺瘤中的应用。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Jun;32(6):4090-4100. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08510-8. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
7
A radiomics approach for automated diagnosis of ovarian neoplasm malignancy in computed tomography.一种基于放射组学的 CT 自动诊断卵巢肿瘤良恶性的方法。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 22;11(1):8730. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87775-x.
8
Treatment response prediction using MRI-based pre-, post-, and delta-radiomic features and machine learning algorithms in colorectal cancer.基于 MRI 的预处理、后处理和差值放射组学特征及机器学习算法在结直肠癌中的治疗反应预测。
Med Phys. 2021 Jul;48(7):3691-3701. doi: 10.1002/mp.14896. Epub 2021 May 17.
9
Application Values of 2D and 3D Radiomics Models Based on CT Plain Scan in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Ovarian Tumors.基于 CT 平扫的二维和三维放射组学模型在鉴别良恶性卵巢肿瘤中的应用价值。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Feb 17;2022:5952296. doi: 10.1155/2022/5952296. eCollection 2022.
10
Machine Learning Based Radiomic HPV Phenotyping of Oropharyngeal SCC: A Feasibility Study Using MRI.基于机器学习的口咽鳞癌 HPV 放射组学表型分析:MRI 可行性研究。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Mar;131(3):E851-E856. doi: 10.1002/lary.28889. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Multimodal ultrasound-based radiomics and deep learning for differential diagnosis of O-RADS 4-5 adnexal masses.基于多模态超声的影像组学和深度学习用于O-RADS 4-5级附件包块的鉴别诊断
Cancer Imaging. 2025 May 23;25(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00883-z.
2
The value of MRI in differentiating ovarian clear cell carcinoma from other adnexal masses with O-RADS MRI scores of 4-5.使用O-RADS MRI评分4-5时,MRI在鉴别卵巢透明细胞癌与其他附件肿块中的价值。
Insights Imaging. 2025 Jan 29;16(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01860-z.
3
Radiomics in radiology: What the radiologist needs to know about technical aspects and clinical impact.
放射学中的放射组学:放射科医生需要了解的技术方面和临床影响。
Radiol Med. 2024 Dec;129(12):1751-1765. doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01904-w. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
4
F-Fluoro-2-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Measures of Spatial Heterogeneity for Predicting Platinum Resistance of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer.氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描测量空间异质性预测高级别浆液性卵巢癌铂类耐药。
Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(20):e70287. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70287.
5
CT-based radiomic analysis for categorization of ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors and epithelial ovarian cancers.基于 CT 的放射组学分析在卵巢性索-间质肿瘤和上皮性卵巢癌分类中的应用。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Nov;49(11):4131-4139. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04437-y. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
6
Ovarian cancer beyond imaging: integration of AI and multiomics biomarkers.卵巢癌的影像学之外:人工智能与多组学生物标志物的整合。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2023 Sep 13;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s41747-023-00364-7.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of CT and MRI radiomics in ovarian cancer: methodological issues and clinical utility.卵巢癌CT和MRI影像组学的系统评价与Meta分析:方法学问题与临床应用
Insights Imaging. 2023 Jul 3;14(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01464-z.
8
Artificial intelligence performance in image-based ovarian cancer identification: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于图像的卵巢癌识别中的人工智能性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Sep 17;53:101662. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101662. eCollection 2022 Nov.