Hinz Andreas, Zenger Markus, Schmalbach Bjarne, Brähler Elmar, Hofmeister Dirk, Petrowski Katja
Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Stendal, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 22;13:923537. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923537. eCollection 2022.
Quality of life (QoL) has been the focus of increasing interest in oncology. QoL assessment instruments implicitly assume that each QoL domain has the same meaning for each patient. The objective of this study was to analyze the importance of and the satisfaction with QoL domains and to analyze the relationship between the two.
A sample of 308 breast cancer survivors was examined twice with a three-month time interval. The women completed the two QoL questionnaires Questions of Life Satisfaction (FLZ-M), which measures participants' satisfaction with eight QoL domains and the subjective importance of those domains to them, and the EORTC QLQ-C30. A sample of 1,143 women from the general population served as controls.
Compared with the general population sample, the patients were less satisfied with their health and more satisfied with all other QoL domains. The subjective importance of health was lower in the patients' sample (Effect size: = 0.38). Satisfaction with health and importance of health were slightly positively correlated ( between 0.05 and 0.08). The effect of QoL domain importance on general QoL was small (beta between -0.05 and 0.11), and interaction effects between domain importance and satisfaction on the prediction of global QoL were negligible.
In addition to satisfaction with QoL dimensions, the subjective importance of these dimensions is relevant for psychooncological research and treatment. Health is not the only relevant QoL domain in breast cancer survivors, other domains such as finances also deserve health care providers' attention.
生活质量(QoL)一直是肿瘤学领域日益关注的焦点。生活质量评估工具隐含地假设每个生活质量领域对每个患者都具有相同的意义。本研究的目的是分析生活质量领域的重要性和满意度,并分析两者之间的关系。
对308名乳腺癌幸存者进行了两次检查,时间间隔为三个月。这些女性完成了两份生活质量问卷,即生活满意度问卷(FLZ-M),该问卷测量参与者对八个生活质量领域的满意度以及这些领域对他们的主观重要性,以及欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织的QLQ-C30问卷。从普通人群中抽取的1143名女性作为对照组。
与普通人群样本相比,患者对自己的健康状况不太满意,而对所有其他生活质量领域更满意。患者样本中健康的主观重要性较低(效应量:=0.38)。对健康的满意度与健康的重要性呈轻微正相关(相关系数在0.05至0.08之间)。生活质量领域重要性对总体生活质量的影响较小(β值在-0.05至0.11之间),领域重要性与满意度之间对总体生活质量预测的交互作用可忽略不计。
除了对生活质量维度的满意度外,这些维度的主观重要性对于心理肿瘤学研究和治疗也具有相关性。健康并非乳腺癌幸存者唯一相关的生活质量领域,其他领域如财务状况也值得医疗服务提供者关注。