Department of Endocrinology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250021, China.
Shandong Clinical Medical Center of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Jinan, Shandong, 250021, China.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(3):667-674. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07731-x. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
Limited studies have explored the predictive efficiency of prediabetes based on two definitions for diabetes among Chinese middle-aged and older populations with prediabetes.
To evaluate the predictive efficiency of prediabetes based on two definitions for diabetes and the clinical and public health benefit in Chinese middle-aged and older populations.
A 5-year cohort study from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.
A total of 5208 participants who had blood sample data at baseline in 2011.
The exposure was prediabetes based on American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) definition. The main outcome was incident diabetes. The ability of prediabetes for predicting diabetes was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to explore the associations between prediabetes and the 5-year risk of diabetes and all-cause mortality.
Among those with prediabetes according to the ADA definition, only 426 (15.45%) with baseline prediabetes progressed to total diabetes, while according to the WHO definition, 208 (21.89%) progressed to total diabetes. In terms of the ability of predicting the incident total diabetes in 5 years, the ADA definition has a higher sensitivity than the WHO definition (70.76% versus 34.55%, P < 0.001), while the WHO definition has a higher specificity than the ADA definition (84.09% versus 49.35%, P < 0.001). Positive predictive values based on the two definitions were low (< 24%); negative predictive values were high (> 90%).
Neither definition of prediabetes is robust for predicting diabetes development in Chineses middle-aged and older populations.
针对中国中老年人群的糖尿病前期,已有少量研究探索了基于两种糖尿病定义的糖尿病前期预测效率。
评估基于两种糖尿病定义的糖尿病前期的预测效率以及在该人群中的临床和公共卫生获益。
来自中国健康与养老追踪调查的 5 年队列研究。
共有 5208 名参与者在 2011 年基线时有血液样本数据。
暴露因素为美国糖尿病协会(ADA)和世界卫生组织(WHO)定义的糖尿病前期。主要结局为新发糖尿病。采用灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值评估糖尿病前期对糖尿病的预测能力。采用 Cox 比例风险回归模型探索糖尿病前期与 5 年糖尿病风险和全因死亡率之间的关联。
根据 ADA 定义,仅有 426 名(15.45%)基线时患有糖尿病前期的患者进展为全部糖尿病,而根据 WHO 定义,有 208 名(21.89%)患者进展为全部糖尿病。在预测 5 年内新发全部糖尿病的能力方面,ADA 定义的灵敏度高于 WHO 定义(70.76%比 34.55%,P<0.001),而 WHO 定义的特异度高于 ADA 定义(84.09%比 49.35%,P<0.001)。两种定义的阳性预测值均较低(<24%);阴性预测值均较高(>90%)。
在预测中国中老年人群糖尿病的发生方面,两种糖尿病前期的定义均不稳健。