Improved visualization of the wrist at lower radiation dose with photon-counting-detector CT.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the image quality of ultra-high-resolution wrist CTs acquired on photon-counting detector CT versus conventional energy-integrating-detector CT systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants were scanned on a photon-counting-detector CT system after clinical energy-integrating detector CTs. Energy-integrating-detector CT scan parameters: comb filter-based ultra-high-resolution mode, 120 kV, 250 mAs, Ur70 or Ur73 kernel, 0.4- or 0.6-mm section thickness. Photon-counting-detector CT scan parameters: non-comb-based ultra-high-resolution mode, 120 kV, 120 mAs, Br84 kernel, 0.4-mm section thickness. Two musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to CT system, scored specific osseous structures using a 5-point Likert scale (1 to 5). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for statistical analysis of reader scores. Paired t-test was used to compare volume CT dose index, bone CT number, and image noise between CT systems. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Twelve wrists (mean participant age 55.3 ± 17.8, 6 females, 6 males) were included. The mean volume CT dose index was lower for photon-counting detector CT (9.6 ± 0.1 mGy versus 19.0 ± 6.7 mGy, p < .001). Photon-counting-detector CT images had higher Likert scores for visualization of osseous structures (median score = 4, p < 0.001). The mean bone CT number was higher in photon-counting-detector CT images (1946 ± 77 HU versus 1727 ± 49 HU, p < 0.001). Conversely, there was no difference in the mean image noise of the two CT systems (63 ± 6 HU versus 61 ± 6 HU, p = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

Ultra-high-resolution imaging with photon-counting-detector CT depicted wrist structures more clearly than conventional energy-integrating-detector CT despite a 49% radiation dose reduction.