BinShabaib Munerah S, ALHarthi Shatha S, Helaby Bashayer S, AlHefdhi Manar H, Mohammed Afrah E, Aabed Kawther
Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Front Oral Health. 2022 Jun 27;3:950840. doi: 10.3389/froh.2022.950840. eCollection 2022.
The aim was to compare the antibacterial effectiveness of two herbal extracts (a) () and (b) () against (), () and (). Aqueous extracts from . were prepared by adding 2 grams of and , respectively to 100 ml distilled water. Bacterial strains of and were treated into 3 groups. In groups 1 and 2, bacterial strains were treated with aqueous extracts of and , respectively. In the control-group, bacterial strains were exposed to distilled water. Antibacterial activity of the samples and nanoparticles was determined. The minimum-inhibitory-concentration (MIC) values were determined using the microdilution method. < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. The MIC for all bacterial strains treated with was significantly higher than that of . ( < 0.001). There was no significant difference in MIC for strains of and treated with . For bacterial strains treated with . , the MIC was significantly higher for compared with and strains ( < 0.01). There was no difference in MIC for and strains treated with . . The antibacterial efficacy of is higher than against and .
目的是比较两种草药提取物（a）（）和（b）（）对（）、（）和（）的抗菌效果。分别将2克和加入100毫升蒸馏水中，制备出.的水提取物。将和的细菌菌株分为3组。在第1组和第2组中，细菌菌株分别用和的水提取物处理。在对照组中，细菌菌株暴露于蒸馏水中。测定样品和纳米颗粒的抗菌活性。使用微量稀释法测定最低抑菌浓度（MIC）值。<0.01被认为具有统计学意义。用处理的所有细菌菌株的MIC显著高于用处理的（<0.001）。用处理的和菌株的MIC没有显著差异。对于用处理的细菌菌株，与和菌株相比，的MIC显著更高（<0.01）。用处理的和菌株的MIC没有差异。在对抗和方面，的抗菌效果高于。
