A comparative study for the evaluation of CT-based conventional, radiomic, combined conventional and radiomic, and delta-radiomic features, and the prediction of the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as ground-glass nodules.

AIM

To investigate and compare the performance of conventional, radiomic, combined, and delta-radiomic features to predict the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as ground-glass nodules (GGNs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present retrospective study included 216 GGNs confirmed surgically as pulmonary adenocarcinomas. All the thin-section computed tomography (CT) images were imported into the software of the United Imaging Intelligence research portal, and radiomic features were extracted with three-dimensional (3D) regions of interest. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator was used to select the optimal radiomic features. Four models were constructed, including conventional, radiomic, combined conventional and radiomic, and delta-radiomic models. The receiver operating characteristic curves were built to evaluate the validity of these.

RESULTS

The type, long diameter, shape, margin, vacuole, air bronchus, vascular convergence, and pleural traction exhibited significant differences between pre-invasive lesions (PILs)/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and invasive adenocarcinoma (IA) groups were selected for conventional model building. Nine radiomic features were selected to build the radiomic model. The four models indicated optimal performance (AUC > 0.7). The radiomic and combined models exhibited the highest diagnostic efficiency, and their AUC were 0.89 and 0.88 in the training set, and 0.87 and 0.88 in the validation set, respectively. The delta-radiomic model indicated that the AUC was 0.83 in the training set, and 0.76 in the validation set. Finally, the conventional model exhibited an AUC in the training and validation sets of 0.78 and 0.76.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiomic model and combined model, in particular, and the delta-radiomic model all demonstrated improved diagnostic efficiency in differentiating IA from PIL/MIA than that of the conventional model.