Polissar L, Severson R K, Brown N K
J Community Health. 1987 Spring;12(1):40-55. doi: 10.1007/BF01321396.
A study was carried out to determine factors affecting place of death (home, hospital, nursing home or "other places") among all 426,115 resident deaths in Washington State during 1968-1981, using death certificate information. Sixteen percent of deaths occurred at home, 74% in institutions (51% in hospitals, 23% in nursing homes) and 9% at "other places." Age, marital status and cause of death all strongly affect place of death. Further, the effect of each factor was strongly dependent on the others. Sex had no effect on place of death after controlling for other factors. Elderly people died relatively more frequently in nursing homes, infants and middle aged people in hospitals and young adults in "other places." The frequency of deaths at home was quite constant by age. Hospitals were the most common place of death following both vascular disease (including heart attack) and neoplasms, and nursing homes were the most common place of death following cerebrovascular disease (including "stroke"). Race, socioeconomic status and urban or rural residents affected the place of death only slightly or not at all. The place of death pattern changed little during the time period 1968-1981, except for a slight increase in frequency of home deaths and a corresponding decrease in the frequency of deaths in other places. Among cancer patients, the likelihood of death at home was positively associated with longer periods of survival after diagnosis. Cancer patients of hospitals serving targeted populations, such as veterans, were relatively more likely to die in a hospital and less likely to die in a nursing home compared to other cancer patients, suggesting that the "targeted" hospitals are sometimes serving a nursing home function. There was a marked difference in the terminal cancer caseload by hospital. The number of cancer deaths per cancer diagnosis varied widely across hospitals (0.1 to 1.6) and was unrelated to size of the hospital or level of services offered. Intervention aimed at affecting place of death, such as increasing the number of deaths at home, will need to take account of the joint effect of age, marital status and disease.
一项研究利用死亡证明信息,对1968年至1981年期间华盛顿州426,115例居民死亡病例中影响死亡地点(家中、医院、疗养院或“其他场所”)的因素进行了调查。16%的死亡发生在家中,74%发生在机构(51%在医院,23%在疗养院),9%发生在“其他场所”。年龄、婚姻状况和死因均对死亡地点有强烈影响。此外,每个因素的影响都强烈依赖于其他因素。在控制其他因素后,性别对死亡地点没有影响。老年人相对更频繁地在疗养院死亡,婴儿和中年人在医院死亡,年轻人在“其他场所”死亡。家中死亡的频率按年龄相当稳定。医院是血管疾病(包括心脏病发作)和肿瘤之后最常见的死亡地点,疗养院是脑血管疾病(包括“中风”)之后最常见的死亡地点。种族、社会经济地位以及城市或农村居民对死亡地点的影响很小或根本没有影响。1968年至1981年期间,死亡地点模式变化不大,只是家中死亡频率略有增加,其他场所死亡频率相应下降。在癌症患者中,在家中死亡的可能性与诊断后存活时间较长呈正相关。与其他癌症患者相比,为特定人群(如退伍军人)服务的医院的癌症患者相对更有可能在医院死亡,而在疗养院死亡的可能性较小,这表明“特定人群”医院有时发挥着疗养院的功能。不同医院的晚期癌症病例数量存在显著差异。每家医院每例癌症诊断的癌症死亡人数差异很大(0.1至1.6),且与医院规模或提供的服务水平无关。旨在影响死亡地点的干预措施,如增加在家中死亡的人数,则需要考虑年龄、婚姻状况和疾病的联合影响。