Mboyerwa Primitiva Andrea, Kibret Kibebew, Mtakwa Peter, Aschalew Abebe
Africa Center of Excellence for Climate-Smart Agriculture and Biodiversity Conservation, Haramaya University, Ethiopia; P. O. Box 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.
Sokoine University of Agriculture, College of Agriculture, Department of Soil and Geological Sciences, P. O. Box 3008, Chuo Kikuu Morogoro, Tanzania.
Heliyon. 2022 Mar 23;8(3):e09140. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09140. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Among the essential plant nutrients, nitrogen (N) is the most important and universally deficient in rice cropping systems worldwide. Despite different practices available for improvement of N management, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is still very low in rice, particularly under conventional management practices. This study was conducted to assess the effect of two crop management practices including the system of rice intensification (SRI) versus conventional management practices (CP) with four N application levels (60, 90, 120, and 150 kg N ha) and absolute control (i.e., without N application) on rice growth, grain yield, and NUE. Experiments were established in split-plot randomized complete block design in three replicates. Crop management practices and N levels were treated as the main effect of main-plots and sub-plots, respectively with replicate blocks treated as random factors. Results indicated that deploying of SRI increased rice grain yield by 17.5 and 52.4% during wet and dry seasons, respectively compared with the CP. Rice grain yield was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in SRI than in CP at all levels of N application compared. The application of N at 120 and 60 kg ha resulted in the increase in rice grain yields by 49 and 46.5%, respectively, relative to the absolute control during wet and dry seasons. Nitrogen application had a significant effect (p < 0.05) on agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (ANUE) and partial factor productivity (PFP). Results also indicated that agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (ANUE) was higher (27.2 kg grain kg N) during the wet season with an application of 60 kg N ha. Furthermore, higher ANUE (23.8 kg grain kg N) was recorded during dry season with an application of 90 kg N ha. The significant (p < 0.05) interaction effects of treatments were recorded on PFP between SRI and 60 kg N ha during the wet (116.7 kg grain kg N) and dry (105.8 kg grain kg N) seasons. This study revealed that ANUE and PFP decreased with N application at the levels of 120 and 150 kg N ha under SRI and CP during the two cropping seasons. The findings of the present study provide potential information that rice grain yield and higher NUE could be achieved at low N inputs under SRI, and thus reducing costs resulted from fertilizer inputs without compromising other environmental benefits.
在植物必需养分中,氮(N)是最重要且在全球水稻种植系统中普遍缺乏的养分。尽管有多种改善氮素管理的方法,但水稻的氮素利用效率(NUE)仍然很低,特别是在传统管理方式下。本研究旨在评估两种作物管理方式的效果,包括水稻强化栽培系统(SRI)与传统管理方式(CP),设置四个施氮水平(60、90、120和150千克氮/公顷)以及绝对对照(即不施氮)对水稻生长、籽粒产量和氮素利用效率的影响。试验采用裂区随机完全区组设计,重复三次。作物管理方式和氮水平分别作为主区和副区的主要因素,重复区组作为随机因素。结果表明,与传统管理方式相比,采用水稻强化栽培系统在雨季和旱季分别使水稻籽粒产量提高了17.5%和52.4%。在所有施氮水平下,水稻强化栽培系统的籽粒产量均显著高于传统管理方式(p < 0.05)。在雨季和旱季,每公顷施氮120千克和60千克分别使水稻籽粒产量相对于绝对对照提高了49%和46.5%。施氮对农学氮素利用效率(ANUE)和偏生产力(PFP)有显著影响(p < 0.05)。结果还表明,在雨季每公顷施氮60千克时,农学氮素利用效率较高(27.2千克籽粒/千克氮)。此外,在旱季每公顷施氮90千克时,记录到较高的农学氮素利用效率(23.8千克籽粒/千克氮)。在雨季(116.7千克籽粒/千克氮)和旱季(105.8千克籽粒/千克氮),水稻强化栽培系统与每公顷施氮60千克处理之间在偏生产力上存在显著的(p < 0.05)交互作用。本研究表明,在两个种植季节中,水稻强化栽培系统和传统管理方式下,每公顷施氮120千克和150千克时,农学氮素利用效率和偏生产力均随施氮量增加而降低。本研究结果提供了潜在信息,即在水稻强化栽培系统下,低氮投入可实现水稻籽粒产量和更高的氮素利用效率,从而在不影响其他环境效益的情况下降低肥料投入成本。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021-8
Front Plant Sci. 2022-8-25
Heliyon. 2021-8-9
Front Plant Sci. 2021-6-4
Sci Total Environ. 2020-5-19
Front Plant Sci. 2017-10-31
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017-6