Suppr超能文献

水稻强化栽培管理和常规移栽稻管理对秧苗处理的影响。

Effects of seedling treatment with System of Rice Intensification management and with conventional management of transplanted rice.

作者信息

Khadka Ram B, Uphoff Norman

机构信息

Regional Agricultural Research Station, Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Khajura, Banke, Nepal.

Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, United States of America.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2019 Jan 11;7:e5877. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5877. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Many benefits of inoculation for improving crop production have been documented, including growth and yield enhancement and the alleviation of biotic and abiotic stresses. However, because rice is usually cultivated under continuous flooding that creates anaerobic soil conditions, this limits the benefits of these beneficial fungi. Cultivating rice with the methods of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) provides rice plants with a more favorable environment for their colonization by beneficial microbes in the soil because the soil is more aerobic under SRI management and contains more organic matter. This study evaluated the effects of inoculation of rice plants under SRI management compared with transplanted and flooded rice plants, considering also the effects of different means of fertilization and different varieties in rice. Experiments were conducted in 2015 and 2016 under the tropical climate of Nepal's western terai (plains) during both the rainy season (July to November) and the dry season (March to July). The results indicated significantly better performance ( = 0.01) associated with inoculation for both seasons and for both systems of crop management in terms of grain yield and other growth-contributing factors, compared to non-inoculated rice cropping. Relatively higher effects on grain yield were recorded also with organic compared to inorganic fertilization; for unimproved (heirloom) varieties compared with improved varieties; and from SRI vs. conventional flooded crop management. The yield increase with treatments across all trials was 31% higher than in untreated plots (4.9 vs 4.5 mt ha). With treatment, yields compared with non-treated plots were 24% higher with organic SRI (6.38 vs 5.13 mt ha) and 52% higher with non-organic SRI (6.38 vs 3.53 mt ha). With regard to varietal differences, under SRI management inoculation of the improved variety Sukhadhan-3 led to 26% higher yield (6.35 vs 5.04 mt ha), and with the heirloom variety Tilkidhan, yield was 41% higher (6.29 vs 4.45 mt ha). Economic analysis indicated that expanding the organic cultivation of local landraces under SRI management should be profitable for farmers where such rice has a good market price due to its premium quality and high demand and when SRI enhances yield. These varieties' present low yields can be significantly increased by integrating bio-inoculation with SRI cultural methods. Other recent research has shown that such inoculation can be managed profitably by farmers themselves.

摘要

接种有益微生物对提高作物产量的诸多益处已有文献记载,包括促进生长、提高产量以及缓解生物和非生物胁迫。然而,由于水稻通常种植在持续淹水的环境中,这种厌氧土壤条件限制了这些有益真菌发挥作用。采用水稻强化栽培体系(SRI)的方法种植水稻,能为水稻植株创造更有利于土壤中有益微生物定殖的环境,因为在SRI管理模式下土壤的需氧量更高且含有更多有机质。本研究评估了在SRI管理模式下接种有益微生物对水稻植株的影响,并与移栽和淹水种植的水稻植株进行比较,同时还考虑了不同施肥方式和不同水稻品种的影响。实验于2015年和2016年在尼泊尔西部特赖平原(热带气候)的雨季(7月至11月)和旱季(3月至7月)进行。结果表明,与未接种的水稻种植相比,在两个季节以及两种作物管理体系下,接种有益微生物在谷物产量和其他生长相关因素方面均表现出显著更好的效果(P = 0.01)。与无机施肥相比,有机施肥对谷物产量的影响相对更高;与改良品种相比,传统(祖传)品种的效果更明显;与传统淹水作物管理相比,SRI管理模式的效果更佳。在所有试验中,接种有益微生物处理的产量比未处理地块高出31%(4.9 吨/公顷对4.5 吨/公顷)。在接种有益微生物处理下,与未处理地块相比,有机SRI管理模式下的产量高出24%(6.38 吨/公顷对5.13 吨/公顷),非有机SRI管理模式下的产量高出52%(6.38 吨/公顷对3.53 吨/公顷)。关于品种差异,在SRI管理模式下,接种有益微生物的改良品种苏卡丹-3产量提高了26%(6.35 吨/公顷对5.04 吨/公顷),传统品种蒂尔基丹的产量提高了41%(6.29 吨/公顷对4.45 吨/公顷)。经济分析表明,在SRI管理模式下扩大当地传统品种的有机种植对农民来说应该是有利可图的,前提是这种水稻因其优质和高需求而有良好的市场价格,并且SRI能提高产量。通过将有益微生物接种与SRI栽培方法相结合,这些品种目前较低的产量可显著提高。最近的其他研究表明,农民自己就能有效地管理这种接种。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a33/6343584/892086cdd89b/peerj-07-5877-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验