Hu Yajie, Cai Qin, Xu Yi, Xue Jiantao, Yu Enwei, Wei Haiyan, Xu Ke, Huo Zhongyang, Zhang Hongcheng
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Oct 10;14:1281309. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1281309. eCollection 2023.
Nitrogen (N) rate reduction and simplified fertilization can mitigate environmental impacts and reduce the involvement of manual labor in rice ( L.) production. Controlled-release urea (CRU) has been recommended as an effective alternative technique to conventional urea fertilization, and it can improve rice yield and N use efficiency (NUE) and reduce labor costs. However, the information on the effects of one-time fertilization with CRU on maintaining yield and improving NUE under reduced chemical N conditions is limited. In this study, controlled-release bulk blending fertilizer (CRF), consisting of CRU with release periods of 40 and 100 days, mixed with compound fertilizer, was applied as basal fertilizer. Increased ~20% plant density (ID) and rapeseed cake fertilizer (RC, increase 20% organic N) were combined with CRF, respectively. The N treatments with 20% chemical N reduction were as follows: reduced N fertilizer (RNF), CRF, CRF+ID, and CRF+RC. In addition, a conventional split fertilizer application with 300 kg ha N was applied as the control (CK). Rice yield and its components, dry matter accumulation, N uptake, and NUE were investigated to evaluate whether one-time N fertilization realized stable yield and high NUE under reduced 20% chemical N conditions. Compared with CK, the CRF+RC treatment exhibited a comparable grain yield, while the other reduced N treatments (RNF, CRF, and CRF+ID) had a lower grain yield. Moreover, CRF+ID exhibited a higher rice grain yield than RNF or CRF under the same N level. Irrespective of exogenous organic N, CRF+RC exhibited significantly higher NUE than CK. The CRF+ID treatment showed a significantly higher N partial factor productivity (PFN) than CK but comparable N agronomic efficiency (NAE) and N recovery efficiency (NRE). Therefore, a one-time fertilizer application of CRF+RC maintained grain yield and improved the NUE while reducing the N rate and fertilization times, demonstrating its potential application in rice production.
减氮与简化施肥可减轻对环境的影响,并减少水稻生产中的人工劳动投入。控释尿素(CRU)已被推荐为传统尿素施肥的一种有效替代技术,它可提高水稻产量和氮素利用效率(NUE),并降低劳动力成本。然而,在减少化学氮肥用量的条件下,一次性施用CRU对维持产量和提高NUE效果的相关信息有限。在本研究中,由释放期为40天和100天的CRU与复合肥混合而成的控释掺混肥料(CRF)用作基肥。分别将种植密度提高约20%(ID)和施用菜籽饼肥(RC,有机氮增加20%)与CRF相结合。减少20%化学氮肥用量的氮处理如下:减施氮肥(RNF)、CRF、CRF+ID和CRF+RC。此外,以常规分次施用300 kg·ha⁻¹氮肥作为对照(CK)。研究了水稻产量及其构成因素、干物质积累、氮素吸收和NUE,以评估在减少20%化学氮肥用量的条件下一次性施氮是否能实现稳定产量和高NUE。与CK相比,CRF+RC处理的籽粒产量相当,而其他减氮处理(RNF、CRF和CRF+ID)的籽粒产量较低。此外,在相同氮水平下,CRF+ID的水稻籽粒产量高于RNF或CRF。无论外源有机氮如何,CRF+RC的NUE均显著高于CK。CRF+ID处理的氮偏生产力(PFN)显著高于CK,但氮农学效率(NAE)和氮回收效率(NRE)相当。因此,一次性施用CRF+RC在降低施氮量和施肥次数的同时维持了籽粒产量并提高了NUE,证明了其在水稻生产中的潜在应用价值。