Suppr超能文献

在减氮条件下,一次性施用控释尿素与复合肥和菜籽饼可维持水稻产量并提高氮素利用效率。

One-time fertilization of controlled-release urea with compound fertilizer and rapeseed cake maintains rice grain yield and improves nitrogen use efficiency under reduced nitrogen conditions.

作者信息

Hu Yajie, Cai Qin, Xu Yi, Xue Jiantao, Yu Enwei, Wei Haiyan, Xu Ke, Huo Zhongyang, Zhang Hongcheng

机构信息

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2023 Oct 10;14:1281309. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1281309. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) rate reduction and simplified fertilization can mitigate environmental impacts and reduce the involvement of manual labor in rice ( L.) production. Controlled-release urea (CRU) has been recommended as an effective alternative technique to conventional urea fertilization, and it can improve rice yield and N use efficiency (NUE) and reduce labor costs. However, the information on the effects of one-time fertilization with CRU on maintaining yield and improving NUE under reduced chemical N conditions is limited. In this study, controlled-release bulk blending fertilizer (CRF), consisting of CRU with release periods of 40 and 100 days, mixed with compound fertilizer, was applied as basal fertilizer. Increased ~20% plant density (ID) and rapeseed cake fertilizer (RC, increase 20% organic N) were combined with CRF, respectively. The N treatments with 20% chemical N reduction were as follows: reduced N fertilizer (RNF), CRF, CRF+ID, and CRF+RC. In addition, a conventional split fertilizer application with 300 kg ha N was applied as the control (CK). Rice yield and its components, dry matter accumulation, N uptake, and NUE were investigated to evaluate whether one-time N fertilization realized stable yield and high NUE under reduced 20% chemical N conditions. Compared with CK, the CRF+RC treatment exhibited a comparable grain yield, while the other reduced N treatments (RNF, CRF, and CRF+ID) had a lower grain yield. Moreover, CRF+ID exhibited a higher rice grain yield than RNF or CRF under the same N level. Irrespective of exogenous organic N, CRF+RC exhibited significantly higher NUE than CK. The CRF+ID treatment showed a significantly higher N partial factor productivity (PFN) than CK but comparable N agronomic efficiency (NAE) and N recovery efficiency (NRE). Therefore, a one-time fertilizer application of CRF+RC maintained grain yield and improved the NUE while reducing the N rate and fertilization times, demonstrating its potential application in rice production.

摘要

减氮与简化施肥可减轻对环境的影响,并减少水稻生产中的人工劳动投入。控释尿素(CRU)已被推荐为传统尿素施肥的一种有效替代技术,它可提高水稻产量和氮素利用效率(NUE),并降低劳动力成本。然而,在减少化学氮肥用量的条件下,一次性施用CRU对维持产量和提高NUE效果的相关信息有限。在本研究中,由释放期为40天和100天的CRU与复合肥混合而成的控释掺混肥料(CRF)用作基肥。分别将种植密度提高约20%(ID)和施用菜籽饼肥(RC,有机氮增加20%)与CRF相结合。减少20%化学氮肥用量的氮处理如下:减施氮肥(RNF)、CRF、CRF+ID和CRF+RC。此外,以常规分次施用300 kg·ha⁻¹氮肥作为对照(CK)。研究了水稻产量及其构成因素、干物质积累、氮素吸收和NUE,以评估在减少20%化学氮肥用量的条件下一次性施氮是否能实现稳定产量和高NUE。与CK相比,CRF+RC处理的籽粒产量相当,而其他减氮处理(RNF、CRF和CRF+ID)的籽粒产量较低。此外,在相同氮水平下,CRF+ID的水稻籽粒产量高于RNF或CRF。无论外源有机氮如何,CRF+RC的NUE均显著高于CK。CRF+ID处理的氮偏生产力(PFN)显著高于CK,但氮农学效率(NAE)和氮回收效率(NRE)相当。因此,一次性施用CRF+RC在降低施氮量和施肥次数的同时维持了籽粒产量并提高了NUE,证明了其在水稻生产中的潜在应用价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd31/10595149/dd989e39004d/fpls-14-1281309-g001.jpg

相似文献

6
[Impacts of one-off fertilization on nitrogen leaching and economic benefits for rice-rape rotation system].
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Apr;30(4):1097-1109. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201904.021.
8
Highly active biostimulant Paecilomyces variotii extracts reduced controlled-release urea application while maintaining rice yield.
J Sci Food Agric. 2022 Mar 30;102(5):1883-1893. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11525. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
9

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Sustainable intensification for a larger global rice bowl.
Nat Commun. 2021 Dec 9;12(1):7163. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27424-z.
2
Effects of application of rapeseed cake as organic fertilizer on rice quality at high yield level.
J Sci Food Agric. 2022 Mar 30;102(5):1832-1841. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11518. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
5
Producing more grain with lower environmental costs.
Nature. 2014 Oct 23;514(7523):486-9. doi: 10.1038/nature13609. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
6
Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people.
Science. 2010 Feb 12;327(5967):812-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1185383. Epub 2010 Jan 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验