Lu Lin, Zhou Kaiji, Wang Yingzhao, Zhu Sishi
School of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.
Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 1;13:920006. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920006. eCollection 2022.
The meta-analysis was conducted to examine the relationships between three dimensions of paternalistic leadership and employee innovation in Chinese enterprises. There exists over a decade of empirical research on the influence of paternalistic leadership on employee innovation in China, but the findings from the various studies are not consistent. Sixty-nine studies from 2009 to 2021 were included in the meta-analysis, and 154 effect sizes were examined. The study found that two dimensions of paternalistic leadership (benevolent leadership = 0.396 and moral leadership = 0.329) were positively associated with employee innovation. In contrast, the dimension of authoritarian leadership was negatively associated with innovation ( = -0.151). Moderator analyses found that gender, the education level of employees, time, and the type of evaluation served as meaningful moderators. The moderating effects of outcome measure, the type of data collection method, and the type of publication were not significant. We discuss our limitations, implications for future studies, and practical implications for organizational management.
本荟萃分析旨在研究中国企业中家长式领导的三个维度与员工创新之间的关系。在中国,关于家长式领导对员工创新影响的实证研究已有十多年,但各项研究的结果并不一致。本荟萃分析纳入了2009年至2021年的69项研究,并检验了154个效应量。研究发现,家长式领导的两个维度(仁慈领导=0.396,德行领导=0.329)与员工创新呈正相关。相比之下,专制领导维度与创新呈负相关(=-0.151)。调节效应分析发现,性别、员工教育水平、时间和评价类型是有意义的调节变量。结果测量类型、数据收集方法类型和出版物类型的调节效应不显著。我们讨论了研究的局限性、对未来研究的启示以及对组织管理的实际意义。