基于组织的总体自尊量表的验证
Validation of the Organizational-Based General Self-Esteem Scale.
作者信息
Filosa Lorenzo, Alessandri Guido
机构信息
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 14;13:865153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865153. eCollection 2022.
Abstract
Using data from four different samples of full-time employees ( = 2,474), the present study was aimed to introduce and demonstrate the validity and reliability of the Organizational-Based General Self-esteem Scale (OB-GSE) a new six-item self-report scale to measure organizational-based self-esteem (OBSE) at work. Results provided evidence of (1) validity (internal, external, and convergent), (2) reliability, and (3) temporal stability of the OB-GSE scale. All in all, results attested the usefulness and the effectiveness of the OB-GSE scale.
摘要
本研究使用来自四个不同全职员工样本（n = 2474）的数据，旨在介绍并证明基于组织的总体自尊量表（OB - GSE）的有效性和可靠性。该量表是一个新的包含六个条目的自陈式量表，用于测量工作中基于组织的自尊（OBSE）。结果提供了以下方面的证据：（1）有效性（内部有效性、外部有效性和聚合有效性），（2）可靠性，以及（3）OB - GSE量表的时间稳定性。总而言之，结果证实了OB - GSE量表的实用性和有效性。
相似文献
1
Validation of the Organizational-Based General Self-Esteem Scale.基于组织的总体自尊量表的验证
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 14;13:865153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865153. eCollection 2022.
2
Development and validation of the Japanese version of organization-based self-esteem scale.组织为本的自尊量表的日文化及验证。
J Occup Health. 2011;53(3):188-96. doi: 10.1539/joh.l10129. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
3
High Organization-Based Self-Esteem Is Associated With Lower Risk of Depressive Symptoms Among University Athletes.基于高组织性的自尊与大学生运动员抑郁症状风险较低相关。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 27;13:841271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841271. eCollection 2022.
4
Self-Esteem in 60 Seconds: The Six-Item State Self-Esteem Scale (SSES-6).60 秒内的自尊：六项目状态自尊量表 (SSES-6)。
Assessment. 2022 Mar;29(2):152-168. doi: 10.1177/1073191120958059. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
5
Validation of the Occupational Self-Efficacy Scale in a Sample of Chinese Employees.中国员工样本中职业自我效能量表的效度验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 1;12:755134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.755134. eCollection 2021.
6
Transformational and Transactional Leadership in the Polish Organizational Context: Validation of the Full and Short Forms of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire.波兰组织背景下的变革型领导与交易型领导：多因素领导问卷完整版与简版的验证
Front Psychol. 2022 May 12;13:908594. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.908594. eCollection 2022.
7
Psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in French clinical and nonclinical adults.法国临床及非临床成年人中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表（CES-D）的心理测量特性
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2011 Oct;59(5):327-40. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2011.03.061. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
8
The development and validation of the Visual Analogue Self-Esteem Scale (VASES).视觉模拟自尊量表（VASES）的开发与验证
Br J Clin Psychol. 1999 Nov;38(4):387-400. doi: 10.1348/014466599162980.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of Rosenberg's self-esteem scale.罗森伯格自尊量表瑞典语版本的心理测量评估。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;72(5):318-324. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2018.1457177. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
10
The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Exercise Overvaluation Scale.运动过度评价量表的编制及心理测量学评价。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2021 Jun 1;43(3):223-233. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2019-0213. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
引用本文的文献
1
Development and Validation of Chinese Version of Dental Pain Screening Questionnaire.中文版牙科疼痛筛查问卷的编制与验证
Int Dent J. 2025 Apr;75(2):1036-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.11.003. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
本文引用的文献
1
Is high self-esteem beneficial? Revisiting a classic question.高自尊有益吗？重新审视一个经典问题。
Am Psychol. 2022 Jan;77(1):5-17. doi: 10.1037/amp0000922.
2
Worse than measurement error: Consequences of inappropriate latent variable measurement models.比测量误差更糟糕：不适当潜在变量测量模型的后果。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Feb;25(1):30-45. doi: 10.1037/met0000220. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
3
The Lifespan Self-Esteem Scale: Initial Validation of a New Measure of Global Self-Esteem.《寿命期自尊量表：一种新的总体自尊测量方法的初步验证》。
J Pers Assess. 2018 Jan-Feb;100(1):84-95. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1278380. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
4
Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here.谢谢克朗巴哈系数，接下来我们自己来。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):412-433. doi: 10.1037/met0000144. Epub 2017 May 29.
5
cocor: a comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations.Cocor：一种用于相关性统计比较的综合解决方案。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(3):e0121945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121945. eCollection 2015.
6
Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: results from three large samples.评估单项目生活满意度量表的效度：来自三个大样本的结果。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Dec;23(10):2809-18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0726-4. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
7
Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.社会科学研究中方法偏差的来源及控制方法建议。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:539-69. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
8
Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic.确保尺度差异卡方检验统计量的正值性。
Psychometrika. 2010 Jun;75(2):243-248. doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.
9
When does self-esteem relate to deviant behavior? The role of contingencies of self-worth.自尊何时与越轨行为相关？自我价值的偶然性作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Sep;94(5):1345-53. doi: 10.1037/a0016115.
10
Core self-evaluations and job burnout: the test of alternative models.核心自我评价与职业倦怠：替代模型的检验
J Occup Health Psychol. 2005 Oct;10(4):441-51. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.441.
Zotero 插件