Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Microbiology (Reading). 2022 Jul;168(7). doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001209.
CRISPR-Cas systems provide bacteria with both specificity and adaptability in defence against invading genetic elements. From a theoretical perspective, CRISPR-Cas systems confer many benefits. However, they are observed at an unexpectedly low prevalence across the bacterial domain. While these defence systems can be gained horizontally, fitness costs may lead to selection against their carriage. Understanding the source of CRISPR-related fitness costs will help us to understand the evolutionary dynamics of CRISPR-Cas systems and their role in shaping bacterial genome evolution. Here, we review our current understanding of the potential fitness costs associated with CRISPR-Cas systems. In addition to potentially restricting the acquisition of genetic material that could confer fitness benefits, we explore five alternative biological factors that from a theoretical perspective may influence the fitness costs associated with CRISPR-Cas system carriage: (1) the repertoire of defence mechanisms a bacterium has available to it, (2) the potential for a metabolic burden, (3) larger-scale population and environmental factors, (4) the phenomenon of self-targeting spacers, and (5) alternative non-defence roles for CRISPR-Cas.
CRISPR-Cas 系统为细菌提供了针对入侵遗传元件的防御特异性和适应性。从理论角度来看,CRISPR-Cas 系统具有许多优势。然而,在细菌领域,这些系统的存在频率却出人意料地低。尽管这些防御系统可以水平获得,但适应度成本可能导致对其携带的选择。了解与 CRISPR 相关的适应度成本的来源将有助于我们理解 CRISPR-Cas 系统的进化动态及其在塑造细菌基因组进化中的作用。在这里,我们回顾了我们目前对与 CRISPR-Cas 系统相关的潜在适应度成本的理解。除了可能限制获得可能赋予适应度优势的遗传物质外,我们还探讨了从理论角度来看,可能影响 CRISPR-Cas 系统携带适应度成本的五个替代生物学因素:(1)细菌可用的防御机制的 repertoire,(2)潜在的代谢负担,(3)更大规模的种群和环境因素,(4)自我靶向间隔区的现象,以及(5)CRISPR-Cas 的替代非防御作用。