Department of Radiology, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Radiology, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Sep;154:110442. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110442. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of reconstruction parameters on image quality in wrist imaging using photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and to compare the results with images from an energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT).
Twelve cadaveric wrist specimens were examined using a prototype PCD-CT and a clinical EID-CT using similar radiation dose. Reconstruction parameters were matched between scanners. Also, sharper reconstruction kernels, a larger matrix size, and smaller slice thicknesses were evaluated for PCD-CT. Image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and image sharpness in trabecular structures were quantitatively measured. Image quality with respect to the visibility of cortical and trabecular bone structures was assessed by six radiologists using visual grading methods.
Images obtained with PCD-CT had lower noise (42.6 ± 3.9 HU vs 75.1 ± 6.3 HU), higher CNR (38.9 ± 4.5 vs 19.0 ± 2.4) and higher trabecular sharpness (63.5 ± 6.0 vs 53.7 ± 8.5) than those obtained with EID-CT using similar scan and reconstruction parameters (p < 0.001). The image sharpness in trabecular structures was further improved by using sharper kernels, despite higher noise levels. Radiologists had a strong preference for PCD-CT images both in terms of spatial resolution and suitability for bone imaging. Visual grading analysis showed an improved visibility of cortical bone, trabeculae and nutritive canals (p < 0.005).
PCD-CT offers improved image quality regarding bone structures in the wrist relative to EID-CT systems, particularly when sharper reconstruction kernels, smaller slice thickness and a larger image matrix size are used.
本研究旨在评估重建参数对光子计数探测器 CT(PCD-CT)腕关节成像质量的影响,并将结果与能量积分探测器 CT(EID-CT)的图像进行比较。
使用原型 PCD-CT 和临床 EID-CT 对 12 具尸体腕关节标本进行检查,使用相似的辐射剂量。在扫描仪之间匹配重建参数。还评估了 PCD-CT 中更锐利的重建核、更大的矩阵大小和更小的层厚。定量测量小梁结构的图像噪声、对比噪声比(CNR)和图像锐度。六位放射科医生使用视觉分级法评估皮质骨和小梁骨结构的可见度来评估图像质量。
与使用相似扫描和重建参数的 EID-CT 相比,PCD-CT 获得的图像噪声更低(42.6 ± 3.9 HU 与 75.1 ± 6.3 HU),CNR 更高(38.9 ± 4.5 与 19.0 ± 2.4),小梁锐度更高(63.5 ± 6.0 与 53.7 ± 8.5)(p < 0.001)。尽管噪声水平较高,但使用更锐利的核可以进一步提高小梁结构的图像锐度。在空间分辨率和骨成像适用性方面,放射科医生更喜欢 PCD-CT 图像。视觉分级分析显示皮质骨、小梁和营养管的可见度得到改善(p < 0.005)。
与 EID-CT 系统相比,PCD-CT 可提供腕关节骨结构的图像质量改善,特别是在使用更锐利的重建核、更小的层厚和更大的图像矩阵大小时。