Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Radiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Feb;159:110662. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110662. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
PURPOSE: To quantitatively and qualitatively assess the visibility of bone structures in the wrist on photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) images compared to state-of-the-art energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). METHOD: Four human cadaveric wrist specimens were scanned with EID-CT and PCD-CT at identical CTDI of 12.2 mGy and with 6.1 mGy (half dose PCD-CT). Axial images were reconstructed using the thinnest possible slice thickness, i.e. 0.4 mm on EID-CT and 0.2 mm on PCD-CT, with the largest image matrix size possible using reconstruction kernels optimized for bone (EID-CT: Ur68, PCD-CT: Br92). Quantitative evaluation was performed to determine contrast-noise ratio (CNR) of bone/ fat, cortical and trabecular sharpness. An observer study using visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis was performed by six observers to assess the visibility of nutrient canals, trabecular architecture, cortical bone and the general image quality. RESULTS: At equal dose, images obtained with PCD-CT had 39 ± 6 % lower CNR (p = 0.001), 71 ± 57 % higher trabecular sharpness in the radius (p = 0.02) and 42 ± 8 % (p < 0.05) sharper cortical edges than those obtained with EID-CT. This was confirmed by VGC analysis showing a superior visibility of nutrient canals, trabeculae and cortical bone area under the curve (AUC) > 0.89) for PCD-CT, even at half dose. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a lower CNR and increased noise, the trabecular and cortical sharpness were twofold higher with PCD-CT. Visual grading analysis demonstrated superior visibility of cortical bone, trabeculae, nutrient canals and an overall improved image quality with PCD-CT over EID-CT. At half dose, PCD-CT also yielded superior image quality, both in quantitative measures and as evaluated by radiologists.
目的:定量和定性评估光子计数探测器 CT(PCD-CT)图像中腕骨结构的可见度与最先进的能量积分探测器 CT(EID-CT)相比。 方法:对 4 个人体腕骨标本分别进行 EID-CT 和 PCD-CT 扫描,CTDI 为 12.2mGy 和 6.1mGy(PCD-CT 半剂量)。使用尽可能薄的切片厚度(EID-CT 为 0.4mm,PCD-CT 为 0.2mm)和最大的图像矩阵大小,使用针对骨骼优化的重建核(EID-CT:Ur68,PCD-CT:Br92)进行轴向图像重建。进行定量评估以确定骨/脂肪、皮质和小梁的对比噪声比(CNR)。通过 6 位观察者进行观察者研究,使用视觉分级特征(VGC)分析来评估营养管、小梁结构、皮质骨和整体图像质量的可见度。 结果:在相同剂量下,PCD-CT 获得的图像的 CNR 降低了 39%±6%(p=0.001),桡骨的小梁锐利度提高了 71%±57%(p=0.02),皮质边缘锐利度提高了 42%±8%(p<0.05)。VGC 分析证实了这一点,显示出 PCD-CT 对营养管、小梁和皮质骨的可视性更好(AUC>0.89),即使在半剂量时也是如此。 结论:尽管 CNR 较低且噪声增加,但 PCD-CT 的小梁和皮质锐利度提高了两倍。视觉分级分析表明,PCD-CT 对皮质骨、小梁、营养管的可视性以及整体图像质量的改善优于 EID-CT。在半剂量时,PCD-CT 也在定量测量和放射科医生评估方面都获得了更好的图像质量。
Nanomicro Lett. 2025-2-24
Int J Biomed Imaging. 2025-1-16
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2024-8
Skeletal Radiol. 2024-9