• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助食管切除术可显著减少术后急性疼痛:一项回顾性临床试验。

Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy Leads to Significant Reduction in Postoperative Acute Pain: A Retrospective Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Department of Data Sciences and Operations, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov;29(12):7498-7509. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12200-0. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-022-12200-0
PMID:35854033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9550779/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) shows promising results regarding postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer. To date, no data are available regarding postoperative analgesic consumption. The aim of this work is to evaluate analgesic consumption after esophagectomy.

METHODS

A total of 274 Ivor Lewis esophageal resections performed sequentially from January 2012 to December 2020 were evaluated. RAMIE cases (n = 51) were compared with the hybrid technique (laparoscopic abdominal phase followed by open thoracotomy, n = 59) and open abdominothoracic esophagectomy (OTE) (n = 164). Data were collected retrospectively. The primary endpoint was the overall postoperative morphine consumption, which represents a reliable indirect measurement of pain. Pain levels recorded on the first, third, and fifth postoperative days were assessed as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 274 patients were included. The postoperative opioid consumption rate for patients who underwent RAMIE (quartiles: 0.14, 0.23, 0.36 mg morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/kg body weight (bw)/day) was significantly lower than in the open group (0.19, 0.33, 0.58 mg MME/kg bw/day, p = 0.016). The overall postoperative opioid consumption for patients who underwent RAMIE was significantly lower (2.45, 3.63, 7.20 mg MME/kg bw/day; morphine milligram equivalents per kilogram body weight) compared with the open (4.85, 8.59, 14.63 MME/kg bw/day, p < 0.0001) and hybrid (4.13, 6.84, 11.36 MME/kg bw/day, p = 0.008) groups. Patients who underwent RAMIE reported lower pain scores compared with the open group on the fifth postoperative day, both at rest (p = 0.004) and while performing activities (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that patients who underwent RAMIE experienced similar postoperative pain while requiring significantly lower amounts of opioids compared with patients who underwent open and hybrid surgery. Further studies are required to verify the results.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)在食管癌患者的术后并发症方面显示出良好的效果。迄今为止,尚无关于术后镇痛消耗的数据。本研究旨在评估食管切除术后的镇痛消耗。

方法

评估了 2012 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间连续进行的 274 例 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术。将 RAMIE 病例(n=51)与杂交技术(腹腔镜腹部阶段后行开胸手术,n=59)和开腹胸腹食管切除术(OTE)(n=164)进行比较。数据进行回顾性收集。主要终点是术后吗啡总消耗量,这是疼痛的可靠间接测量指标。次要终点是术后第 1、3 和 5 天记录的疼痛水平。

结果

共纳入 274 例患者。RAMIE 组(四分位数:0.14、0.23、0.36mg 吗啡毫克当量(MME)/kg 体重(bw)/天)的术后阿片类药物消耗率明显低于开放组(0.19、0.33、0.58mg MME/kg bw/天,p=0.016)。RAMIE 组患者的术后阿片类药物总消耗量(2.45、3.63、7.20mg MME/kg bw/天;吗啡毫克当量/公斤体重)明显低于开放组(4.85、8.59、14.63 MME/kg bw/天,p<0.0001)和杂交组(4.13、6.84、11.36 MME/kg bw/天,p=0.008)。与开放组相比,RAMIE 组患者在术后第 5 天的静息(p=0.004)和活动(p<0.001)时疼痛评分较低。

结论

本研究表明,与接受开放和杂交手术的患者相比,接受 RAMIE 治疗的患者在术后经历了相似的疼痛,但需要的阿片类药物明显减少。需要进一步的研究来验证结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79c2/9550779/b23ad4b414d4/10434_2022_12200_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79c2/9550779/a4c19852e50b/10434_2022_12200_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79c2/9550779/b23ad4b414d4/10434_2022_12200_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79c2/9550779/a4c19852e50b/10434_2022_12200_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79c2/9550779/b23ad4b414d4/10434_2022_12200_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy Leads to Significant Reduction in Postoperative Acute Pain: A Retrospective Clinical Trial.机器人辅助食管切除术可显著减少术后急性疼痛:一项回顾性临床试验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov;29(12):7498-7509. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12200-0. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
2
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗食管癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Apr 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz060.
3
End to side circular stapled anastomosis during robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).机器人辅助 Ivor Lewis 微创食管切除术(RAMIE)中末端到侧的圆形吻合术。
Dis Esophagus. 2022 Aug 13;35(8). doi: 10.1093/dote/doab088.
4
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy - our first experience.机器人辅助微创食管切除术——我们的首次经验。
Rozhl Chir. 2023;102(11):422-429. doi: 10.33699/PIS.2023.102.11.422-429.
5
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)与杂交微创食管切除术:来自欧洲大容量中心的倾向评分匹配短期结果分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7747-7755. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09254-2. Epub 2022 May 3.
6
Robotic Esophagectomy Compared With Open Esophagectomy Reduces Sarcopenia within the First Postoperative Year: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.机器人食管癌切除术与开放食管癌切除术相比可减少术后第一年内的肌肉减少症:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
J Thorac Oncol. 2023 Feb;18(2):232-244. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.10.018. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
7
A comparative evaluation of robotic and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a critical evaluation on the impact of postoperative pain and opioid requirements.机器人与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的比较评估:术后疼痛和阿片类药物需求影响的批判性评估。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7700-7708. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09124-x. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
8
Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Postoperative Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort.机器人辅助微创食管切除术:全国队列的术后结果。
J Surg Res. 2023 Mar;283:152-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.09.029. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
9
Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.机器人辅助与微创食管切除术治疗胸段食管癌患者的长期疗效:倾向评分匹配研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar 20;22(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03358-w.
10
Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.微创 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术:机器人辅助与腹腔镜-胸腔镜技术。系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1692-1701. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.013. Epub 2021 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of surgical approach and downstaging in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a 2010-2020 National Cancer Database (NCDB) study.手术方式及降期对接受新辅助化疗的食管腺癌患者的影响:一项2010 - 2020年国家癌症数据库(NCDB)研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1885-1892. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11495-2. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
2
Caseload per Year in Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Narrative Review.机器人辅助微创食管切除术的年度病例量:一项叙述性综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 19;16(20):3538. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203538.
3
The training pathway for residents: 'Robotic Curriculum for young Surgeons' (RoCS) does not impair patient outcome during implementation into clinical routine.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic Techniques in Esophagogastric Cancer Surgery: An Assessment of Short- and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes.机器人技术在食管胃结合部癌手术中的应用:短期和长期临床结局评估。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 May;29(5):2812-2825. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11082-y. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
2
STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery.STROCSS 2021:加强外科学队列研究、横断面研究和病例对照研究报告规范。
Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106165. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
3
Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial).
住院医师培训途径:“年轻外科医师机器人课程”(RoCS)在实施临床常规时不会影响患者预后。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Aug 6;18(1):307. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02056-9.
4
Minimally invasive esophagectomy with non-invasive ventilation by laryngeal mask-assisted anesthesia for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: case report.喉罩辅助麻醉下非侵入性通气的微创食管癌切除术治疗食管鳞状细胞癌:病例报告
Front Oncol. 2024 May 10;14:1344662. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1344662. eCollection 2024.
5
Is Robotic Surgery the Future for Resectable Esophageal Cancer?: A Systematic Literature Review of Oncological and Clinical Outcomes.机器人手术会是可切除食管癌的未来治疗方式吗?:肿瘤学及临床结局的系统文献综述
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jul;31(7):4281-4297. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15148-5. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
6
Clinical outcomes of the robot-assisted Ivor Lewis procedure for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction with semi-instrument overlap intrathoracic anastomosis.机器人辅助Ivor Lewis手术治疗食管胃交界腺癌并半器械重叠胸内吻合术的临床结果
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jan 30;16(1):542-552. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1856. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
7
Short-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in robotic-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study.机器人辅助McKeown食管癌切除术术后加速康复方案的短期结局:一项单中心回顾性队列研究
Front Oncol. 2023 Dec 12;13:1150945. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1150945. eCollection 2023.
8
Reducing the Risks of Esophagectomies: A Retrospective Comparison of Hybrid versus Full-Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE) Approaches.降低食管切除术风险:杂交手术与全机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)方法的回顾性比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 7;12(18):5823. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185823.
9
Factors Influencing Postoperative Complications Following Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.影响微创Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术后并发症的因素:一项回顾性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 31;12(17):5688. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175688.
10
Regional Anesthetic Use in Trans-Hiatal Esophagectomy. Are They Worth Consideration? A Case Series.经裂孔食管切除术中区域麻醉的应用。它们值得考虑吗?病例系列研究
Local Reg Anesth. 2023 Jul 11;16:99-111. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S398331. eCollection 2023.
机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜食管切除术与微创食管切除术治疗可切除食管腺癌的随机对照试验(ROBOT-2 试验)。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Sep 26;21(1):1060. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08780-x.
4
Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.机器人辅助微创食管癌根治术治疗食管癌术后肺部并发症发生率较低:与传统微创食管癌根治术的倾向评分匹配比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;28(2):639-647. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09081-6. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
5
Epidural anesthesia is no longer the standard of care in abdominal surgery with ERAS. What are the alternatives?在加速康复外科(ERAS)理念下,硬膜外麻醉已不再是腹部手术的标准治疗方式。有哪些替代方案呢?
Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Oct;86(10):1079-1088. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14324-4. Epub 2020 May 18.
6
Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): Promising Results in 100 Consecutive Patients (the European Experience).机器人辅助微创经胸食管切除术(Ivor Lewis):100 例连续患者的良好结果(欧洲经验)。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jan;25(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04510-8. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
7
The Effect of Postoperative Complications After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy on Long-term Survival: An International Multicenter Cohort Study.微创食管切除术(MIE)后术后并发症对长期生存的影响:一项国际多中心队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e1129-e1137. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003772.
8
Health-related Quality of Life Following Hybrid Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Patients With Esophageal Cancer, Analysis of a Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase III Controlled Trial: The MIRO Trial.混合微创与开放食管切除术治疗食管癌患者的健康相关生活质量:多中心、开放标签、随机 III 期对照临床试验分析:MIRO 试验。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jun;271(6):1023-1029. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003559.
9
Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.杂交微创食管癌切除术。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 10;380(2):152-162. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805101.
10
Epidural analgesia after minimally invasive esophagectomy: efficacy and complication profile.微创食管手术后的硬膜外镇痛:疗效和并发症情况。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Aug 1;32(8). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy116.