The Research Centre in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development (CIDESD), 5001-801, Vila Real, Portugal.
Sport Performance, Recreation, Innovation and Technology (SPRINT), Rua Escola Industrial E Comercial de Nun'Alvares, 4900-347, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
BMC Pediatr. 2022 Jul 20;22(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03483-z.
This study aimed to analyze the reliability of the tests included in the motor competence assessment (MCA) battery and compare the effects of the number of trials per test. Thirty female volleyball players (14.6 ± 1.3 years of age) were tested. The participants performed two or three trials of each test. Intra-class correlation (ICC) was calculated, and a paired sample t-test analyzed the variations between trials (1st vs. 2nd vs. 3rd). Results revealed a significant difference between the first and the second trials for jumping sideways [t(29) = -4.108, p < 0.01], standing long jump [t(29) = -3.643, p < 0.01], and shuttle run [t(29) = -3.139, p < 0.01]. No significant result was registered in the shifting platforms, ball throwing and kicking between the first and second trials. Hence, any difference was recorded between the second and third trial. High ICC values were registered in lateral jumps, among the three repetitions of ball kicking and ball throwing, and between the last two repetitions of shuttle run. Almost perfect values were recorded for the shifting platforms and standing long jump. Nevertheless, there seems to be a learning effect between the first and the second repetition-no differences were registered only considering the two manipulative tests. In conclusion, except for jumping sideways, the MCA tests are reliable and only need to be performed two times instead of three.
本研究旨在分析运动能力评估(MCA)测试中各项测试的可靠性,并比较每个测试的试验次数对结果的影响。共有 30 名女性排球运动员(年龄 14.6±1.3 岁)参与了研究。参与者需要完成每个测试的 2 或 3 次试验。我们计算了组内相关系数(ICC),并通过配对样本 t 检验分析了试验之间的差异(第 1 次与第 2 次、第 1 次与第 3 次)。结果显示,在横向跳跃[ t (29)=-4.108,p<0.01]、立定跳远[ t (29)=-3.643,p<0.01]和穿梭跑[ t (29)=-3.139,p<0.01]中,第 1 次与第 2 次试验之间存在显著差异。在移位平台、投球和踢球中,第 1 次与第 2 次试验之间没有显著差异。因此,只有第 2 次与第 3 次试验之间存在差异。在横向跳跃、球踢和球投的 3 次重复中,以及穿梭跑的最后 2 次重复中,ICC 值较高。移位平台和立定跳远的 ICC 值接近完美。然而,在第 1 次和第 2 次重复之间似乎存在学习效应,只有考虑到这两个操作测试时,才没有记录到差异。总之,除了横向跳跃外,MCA 测试是可靠的,只需要进行 2 次而不是 3 次。