• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者 CT 全自动图像质量评估:多供应商和多重建研究。

Fully automated image quality evaluation on patient CT: Multi-vendor and multi-reconstruction study.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Chung-Ang University Gwang Myeong Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jul 20;17(7):e0271724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271724. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0271724
PMID:35857804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9299323/
Abstract

While the recent advancements of computed tomography (CT) technology have contributed in reducing radiation dose and image noise, an objective evaluation of image quality in patient scans has not yet been established. In this study, we present a patient-specific CT image quality evaluation method that includes fully automated measurements of noise level, structure sharpness, and alteration of structure. This study used the CT images of 120 patients from four different CT scanners reconstructed with three types of algorithm: filtered back projection (FBP), vendor-specific iterative reconstruction (IR), and a vendor-agnostic deep learning model (DLM, ClariCT.AI, ClariPi Inc.). The structure coherence feature (SCF) was used to divide an image into the homogeneous (RH) and structure edge (RS) regions, which in turn were used to localize the regions of interests (ROIs) for subsequent analysis of image quality indices. The noise level was calculated by averaging the standard deviations from five randomly selected ROIs on RH, and the mean SCFs on RS was used to estimate the structure sharpness. The structure alteration was defined by the standard deviation ratio between RS and RH on the subtraction image between FBP and IR or DLM, in which lower structure alterations indicate successful noise reduction without degradation of structure details. The estimated structure sharpness showed a high correlation of 0.793 with manually measured edge slopes. Compared to FBP, IR and DLM showed 34.38% and 51.30% noise reduction, 2.87% and 0.59% lower structure sharpness, and 2.20% and -12.03% structure alteration, respectively, on an average. DLM showed statistically superior performance to IR in all three image quality metrics. This study is expected to contribute to enhance the CT protocol optimization process by allowing a high throughput and quantitative image quality evaluation during the introduction or adjustment of lower-dose CT protocol into routine practice.

摘要

虽然计算机断层扫描(CT)技术的最新进展有助于降低辐射剂量和图像噪声,但尚未建立患者扫描图像质量的客观评估方法。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种患者特异性 CT 图像质量评估方法,包括噪声水平、结构清晰度和结构变化的全自动测量。该研究使用了来自四个不同 CT 扫描仪的 120 名患者的 CT 图像,这些图像使用三种类型的算法重建:滤波反投影(FBP)、特定于供应商的迭代重建(IR)和供应商不可知的深度学习模型(DLM,ClariCT.AI,ClariPi Inc.)。结构相干特征(SCF)用于将图像分为均匀(RH)和结构边缘(RS)区域,然后用于定位感兴趣区域(ROI),以进一步分析图像质量指数。噪声水平通过在 RH 上随机选择五个 ROI 的标准偏差的平均值来计算,而 RS 上的平均 SCF 用于估计结构清晰度。结构变化定义为 FBP 和 IR 或 DLM 之间减法图像上 RS 和 RH 之间的标准偏差比,其中较低的结构变化表示在不降低结构细节的情况下成功降低噪声。估计的结构清晰度与手动测量的边缘斜率具有高度相关性(0.793)。与 FBP 相比,IR 和 DLM 分别显示 34.38%和 51.30%的噪声降低,2.87%和 0.59%的结构清晰度降低,2.20%和-12.03%的结构变化,平均而言。在所有三个图像质量指标中,DLM 与 IR 相比均显示出统计学上的优越性能。这项研究有望通过在常规实践中引入或调整低剂量 CT 方案时允许高通量和定量图像质量评估,从而促进 CT 方案优化过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/90a0701ccf7e/pone.0271724.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/69f152750514/pone.0271724.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/ae421b313620/pone.0271724.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/782d12d05931/pone.0271724.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/4021baffed64/pone.0271724.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/403c26efce5e/pone.0271724.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/936a32711755/pone.0271724.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/3ecdbb550616/pone.0271724.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/7cde8747f73e/pone.0271724.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/c2661c931565/pone.0271724.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/1d109d2f9171/pone.0271724.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/b9157aa03f1c/pone.0271724.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/90a0701ccf7e/pone.0271724.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/69f152750514/pone.0271724.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/ae421b313620/pone.0271724.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/782d12d05931/pone.0271724.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/4021baffed64/pone.0271724.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/403c26efce5e/pone.0271724.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/936a32711755/pone.0271724.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/3ecdbb550616/pone.0271724.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/7cde8747f73e/pone.0271724.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/c2661c931565/pone.0271724.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/1d109d2f9171/pone.0271724.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/b9157aa03f1c/pone.0271724.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782b/9299323/90a0701ccf7e/pone.0271724.g012.jpg

相似文献

1
Fully automated image quality evaluation on patient CT: Multi-vendor and multi-reconstruction study.患者 CT 全自动图像质量评估:多供应商和多重建研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 20;17(7):e0271724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271724. eCollection 2022.
2
Image quality of ultralow-dose chest CT using deep learning techniques: potential superiority of vendor-agnostic post-processing over vendor-specific techniques.使用深度学习技术的超低剂量胸部 CT 图像质量:与供应商无关的后处理技术优于特定供应商技术的潜在优势。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):5139-5147. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07537-7. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
3
Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study.与基于深度学习的图像重建算法相比,通用深度学习模型在 CT 中降低剂量的潜力:一项体模研究。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Feb;32(2):1247-1255. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08199-9. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
4
Radiation Dose Consideration in Kidney Stone CT Examinations: Integration of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms With Routine Clinical Practice.肾结石 CT 检查中的辐射剂量考量:迭代重建算法与常规临床实践的整合。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 May;204(5):1055-63. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13038.
5
Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in a phantom study.基于不同管电压的腹部多层 CT 的深度学习图像重建算法:体模研究中对图像质量和辐射剂量的评估。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Jun;32(6):3974-3984. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08459-8. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
6
Noise spatial nonuniformity and the impact of statistical image reconstruction in CT myocardial perfusion imaging.噪声空间非均匀性及统计图像重建对 CT 心肌灌注成像的影响。
Med Phys. 2012 Jul;39(7):4079-92. doi: 10.1118/1.4722983.
7
Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction (IMR) algorithm in ultralow-dose CT for evaluation of urolithiasis: evaluation of radiation dose reduction, image quality, and diagnostic performance.基于知识的迭代模型重建(IMR)算法在超低剂量CT评估尿路结石中的应用:辐射剂量降低、图像质量及诊断性能评估
Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(8):3137-46. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0504-y.
8
Application of Vendor-Neutral Iterative Reconstruction Technique to Pediatric Abdominal Computed Tomography.供应商中立迭代重建技术在儿科腹部 CT 中的应用。
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Sep;20(9):1358-1367. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0715.
9
A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.一项基于图像质量和临床任务表现的放疗中CT重建算法的对比研究。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Jul 8;17(4):377-390. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.5763.
10
CT enterography at 100 kVp with iterative reconstruction compared to 120 kVp filtered back projection: evaluation of image quality and radiation dose in the same patients.100千伏峰值电压下采用迭代重建技术的CT小肠造影与120千伏峰值电压下的滤波反投影法的比较:同一患者图像质量和辐射剂量的评估
Abdom Imaging. 2014 Dec;39(6):1255-60. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0156-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Objective assessment of diagnostic image quality in CT scans: what radiologists and researchers need to know.CT扫描中诊断图像质量的客观评估:放射科医生和研究人员需要了解的内容。
Insights Imaging. 2025 Jul 10;16(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-02037-y.
2
Left, Then Right Internal Carotid Artery Dissection: A Case Report.左侧,继而右侧颈内动脉夹层:一例报告
Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;8(4):365-368. doi: 10.5811/cpcem.21189.
3
State-of-the-Art Deep Learning CT Reconstruction Algorithms in Abdominal Imaging.腹部成像的最新深度学习 CT 重建算法。

本文引用的文献

1
Radiation dose from computed tomography scans for Korean pediatric and adult patients.韩国儿科和成年患者计算机断层扫描的辐射剂量。
J Radiat Prot Res. 2021 Sep;46(3):98-105. doi: 10.14407/jrpr.2021.00010. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
2
Noise reduction profile: A new method for evaluation of noise reduction techniques in CT.降噪谱:一种评估 CT 降噪技术的新方法。
Med Phys. 2022 Jan;49(1):186-200. doi: 10.1002/mp.15382. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
3
Image quality in liver CT: low-dose deep learning vs standard-dose model-based iterative reconstructions.
Radiographics. 2024 Dec;44(12):e240095. doi: 10.1148/rg.240095.
4
Optimization of the "Perth CT" Protocol for Preoperative Planning and Postoperative Evaluation in Total Knee Arthroplasty.优化“珀斯 CT”协议在全膝关节置换术的术前规划和术后评估中的应用。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jan 5;60(1):98. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010098.
5
Development of deep learning-assisted overscan decision algorithm in low-dose chest CT: Application to lung cancer screening in Korean National CT accreditation program.深度学习辅助的低剂量胸部 CT 过扫决策算法的开发:在韩国国家 CT 认证计划肺癌筛查中的应用。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 29;17(9):e0275531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275531. eCollection 2022.
肝脏CT中的图像质量:低剂量深度学习与基于标准剂量的模型迭代重建
Eur Radiol. 2022 May;32(5):2865-2874. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08380-0. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
4
CT Noise-Reduction Methods for Lower-Dose Scanning: Strengths and Weaknesses of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms and New Techniques.CT 噪声降低方法在低剂量扫描中的应用:迭代重建算法和新技术的优缺点。
Radiographics. 2021 Sep-Oct;41(5):1493-1508. doi: 10.1148/rg.2021200196.
5
Deep Learning Algorithm for Simultaneous Noise Reduction and Edge Sharpening in Low-Dose CT Images: A Pilot Study Using Lumbar Spine CT.深度学习算法在低剂量 CT 图像降噪和边缘锐化中的应用:一项基于腰椎 CT 的初步研究
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Nov;22(11):1850-1857. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0140. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
6
Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study.与基于深度学习的图像重建算法相比,通用深度学习模型在 CT 中降低剂量的潜力:一项体模研究。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Feb;32(2):1247-1255. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08199-9. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
7
Assessment of the global noise algorithm for automatic noise measurement in head CT examinations.头 CT 检查中自动噪声测量的全球噪声算法评估。
Med Phys. 2021 Oct;48(10):5702-5711. doi: 10.1002/mp.15133. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
8
Lung cancer screening: who pays? Who receives? The European perspectives.肺癌筛查:谁来付费?谁能受益?欧洲的观点。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 May;10(5):2395-2406. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-677.
9
Superior objective and subjective image quality of deep learning reconstruction for low-dose abdominal CT imaging in comparison with model-based iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection.与基于模型的迭代重建和滤波反投影相比,深度学习重建在低剂量腹部CT成像中具有更高的客观和主观图像质量。
Br J Radiol. 2021 Jul 1;94(1123):20201357. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201357.
10
Image texture, low contrast liver lesion detectability and impact on dose: Deep learning algorithm compared to partial model-based iterative reconstruction.图像纹理、低对比度肝脏病变的可检测性及其对剂量的影响:深度学习算法与部分基于模型的迭代重建的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Aug;141:109808. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109808. Epub 2021 Jun 3.