• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英格兰和威尔士农业中的健康相关生活质量:来自 EQ-5D-3L 自我报告问卷的结果。

Health-related quality of life within agriculture in England and Wales: results from a EQ-5D-3L self-report questionnaire.

机构信息

Centre for Rural Policy Research, University of Exeter, Lazenby House, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter, England, EX4 4PJ.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 20;22(1):1395. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13790-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-13790-w
PMID:35858865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9299404/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mental and physical health problems among the farming community are well documented but there is limited evidence regarding the overall health status of this population. This paper offers a unique insight into this issue through presenting the findings from a survey instrument, the EQ-5D-3L, which provides a standardised measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

METHODS

We conducted the largest ever survey (n = 15,296) of people living and working in agriculture in England and Wales to gather baseline data on health and wellbeing within this community. The survey included an assessment of HRQOL through the use of the EQ-5D-3L self-report questionnaire. A variety of statistical approaches were used to test for significant associations between HRQOL and sub-group characteristics, including the Chi-square test for independence, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney U-test. Binary logistic regression models were also created to assess the influence of a set of respondent characteristics on the likelihood of respondents reporting health problems in the EQ-5D-3L.

RESULTS

24% of respondents reported problems with mobility; 4% reported problems with self-care; 21% reported problems with performing their usual activities; 52% reported problems with pain/discomfort; and 31% reported problems with anxiety/depression. The mean EQ-5D index value was 0.811 (median (Md) 0.796, interquartile range (IQR) 0.275). The mean self-rated health score (EQ-VAS) was 77.6 (SD 16.1) (Md 80.0, IQR 20). In general, holding other respondent characteristics equal, women reported fewer problems with mobility, self-care, performing usual activities and pain/discomfort than men, but more problems with anxiety/depression. HRQOL in the working-aged appears to be poorer among the survey population than the wider UK population.

CONCLUSIONS

Results reveal concerning levels of physical and mental health problems, especially pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression, which appear to be more prevalent within our sample than within the wider UK population. There were important gender and age-related differences in both mental and physical health. Combatting these problems through targeted support is essential for the wellbeing of the farming community and the future sustainability of UK food production.

摘要

背景

农业社区的身心健康问题已有大量记录,但关于该人群整体健康状况的证据有限。本文通过呈现 EQ-5D-3L 调查工具的调查结果,提供了一个独特的视角来探讨这个问题,该工具提供了健康相关生活质量 (HRQOL) 的标准化衡量标准。

方法

我们对英格兰和威尔士生活和工作在农业领域的人群进行了迄今为止规模最大的调查(n=15296),以收集该社区健康和福利的基线数据。该调查通过使用 EQ-5D-3L 自我报告问卷评估 HRQOL。使用了各种统计方法来测试 HRQOL 与亚组特征之间的显著关联,包括卡方检验独立性、克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验和曼-惠特尼 U 检验。还创建了二元逻辑回归模型,以评估一组受访者特征对受访者在 EQ-5D-3L 中报告健康问题可能性的影响。

结果

24%的受访者报告在移动方面存在问题;4%的受访者报告在自我护理方面存在问题;21%的受访者报告在进行日常活动方面存在问题;52%的受访者报告在疼痛/不适方面存在问题;31%的受访者报告在焦虑/抑郁方面存在问题。EQ-5D 指数平均值为 0.811(中位数(Md)为 0.796,四分位距(IQR)为 0.275)。自我报告健康评分(EQ-VAS)的平均值为 77.6(SD 16.1)(Md 为 80.0,IQR 为 20)。一般来说,在其他受访者特征保持不变的情况下,女性在移动、自我护理、进行日常活动和疼痛/不适方面报告的问题少于男性,但在焦虑/抑郁方面报告的问题更多。与更广泛的英国人口相比,调查人群的工作年龄人群的 HRQOL 似乎更差。

结论

结果揭示了令人担忧的身心健康问题水平,尤其是疼痛/不适和焦虑/抑郁,在我们的样本中比更广泛的英国人口中更为普遍。在心理健康和身体健康方面存在重要的性别和年龄差异。通过有针对性的支持来解决这些问题,对于农业社区的福祉和英国食品生产的未来可持续性至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8718/9301827/6e70396d8662/12889_2022_13790_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8718/9301827/3f113768aa94/12889_2022_13790_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8718/9301827/ffaab02bc1ac/12889_2022_13790_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8718/9301827/2f011c176ed5/12889_2022_13790_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8718/9301827/6e70396d8662/12889_2022_13790_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8718/9301827/3f113768aa94/12889_2022_13790_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8718/9301827/ffaab02bc1ac/12889_2022_13790_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8718/9301827/2f011c176ed5/12889_2022_13790_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8718/9301827/6e70396d8662/12889_2022_13790_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Health-related quality of life within agriculture in England and Wales: results from a EQ-5D-3L self-report questionnaire.英格兰和威尔士农业中的健康相关生活质量:来自 EQ-5D-3L 自我报告问卷的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 20;22(1):1395. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13790-w.
2
An exploration of differences between Japan and two European countries in the self-reporting and valuation of pain and discomfort on the EQ-5D.关于日本与两个欧洲国家在EQ-5D量表上疼痛与不适的自我报告及评估差异的探索。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Aug;26(8):2067-2078. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1541-5. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
3
Population health status based on the EQ-5D-Y-3L among adolescents in Sweden: Results by sociodemographic factors and self-reported comorbidity.基于 EQ-5D-Y-3L 对瑞典青少年人群健康状况的评估:社会人口学因素和自我报告合并症的结果。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):2859-2871. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1985-2. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
4
Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life of Chinese Adults in Heilongjiang Using EQ-5D-3L.使用EQ-5D-3L评估黑龙江省中国成年人的健康相关生活质量。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Feb 23;14(3):224. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030224.
5
EQ-5D-3L health status and health state utilities of the oldest-old (85 +) in Germany: results from the AgeCoDe-AgeQualiDe study.德国最年长人群(85 岁及以上)的 EQ-5D-3L 健康状况和健康状态效用:AgeCoDe-AgeQualiDe 研究结果。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Dec;29(12):3223-3232. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02597-0. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
6
Assessing the health of the general population in England: how do the three- and five-level versions of EQ-5D compare?评估英格兰普通人群的健康状况:EQ-5D的三级版本和五级版本对比情况如何?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Oct 21;13:171. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0356-8.
7
Population-level norm values by EQ-5D-3L in Hungary - a comparison of survey results from 2022 with those from 2000.匈牙利基于 EQ-5D-3L 的人群标准值 - 2022 年调查结果与 2000 年调查结果的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Sep;33(9):2417-2428. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03699-9. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
8
Validity of EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life questionnaire in self-reported diabetes: evidence from a general population survey.EQ-5D-5L 健康相关生活质量问卷在自我报告糖尿病中的有效性:来自一般人群调查的证据。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 May 5;19(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01780-2.
9
Comparing the self-perceived quality of life of multimorbid patients and the general population using the EQ-5D-3L.使用EQ-5D-3L比较多病共存患者和普通人群自我感知的生活质量。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 19;12(12):e0188499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188499. eCollection 2017.
10
Health-related quality of life, functional impairment and comorbidity in people with mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study.轻度至中度慢性肾脏病患者的健康相关生活质量、功能障碍及合并症:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 6;10(8):e040286. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040286.

引用本文的文献

1
Health-related quality of life assessed by EQ-5D-5L and its determinants among Chinese adults.采用 EQ-5D-5L 评估的中国成年人健康相关生活质量及其决定因素。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 11;12:1383781. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1383781. eCollection 2024.
2
Factors Associated with Elderly Health-Related Quality of Life in Tibet: A Cross-Sectional Study from a Health Ecological Perspective.西藏老年人健康相关生活质量的影响因素:基于健康生态视角的横断面研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Jan 25;17:177-190. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S436486. eCollection 2024.
3
The wellbeing paradox in Hungarian local sustainable agriculture: a health psychology approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Associated with Suicidal Behavior in Farmers: A Systematic Review.与农民自杀行为相关的因素:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 17;18(12):6522. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126522.
2
Who is lonely in lockdown? Cross-cohort analyses of predictors of loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.封锁期间谁感到孤独?新冠疫情前和期间孤独的预测因素的跨队列分析。
Public Health. 2020 Sep;186:31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.036. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
3
Key Risk Factors Affecting Farmers' Mental Health: A Systematic Review.
匈牙利地方可持续农业中的福祉悖论:健康心理学方法。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):2326. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14643-2.
影响农民心理健康的关键风险因素:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 2;16(23):4849. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234849.
4
Research trends in farmers' mental health: A scoping review of mental health outcomes and interventions among farming populations worldwide.农民心理健康研究趋势:全球农业人口心理健康结果和干预措施的范围综述。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 5;14(12):e0225661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225661. eCollection 2019.
5
Drought-related stress among farmers: findings from the Australian Rural Mental Health Study.农民与干旱相关的压力:来自澳大利亚农村心理健康研究的发现。
Med J Aust. 2018 Aug 20;209(4):159-165. doi: 10.5694/mja17.01200. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
6
Suicide among agricultural, forestry, and fishery workers: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.农业、林业和渔业工人的自杀问题:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):3-15. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3682. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
7
Comparative Study on Health-Related Quality of Life of Farmers and Workers.农民与工人健康相关生活质量的比较研究
Value Health Reg Issues. 2017 May;12:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2017.03.006.
8
Association of risk factors with musculoskeletal disorders in manual-working farmers.体力劳动型农民的风险因素与肌肉骨骼疾病的关联
Arch Environ Occup Health. 2018 Jan 2;73(1):19-28. doi: 10.1080/19338244.2017.1289890. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
9
Anxiety and depression following cumulative low-level exposure to organophosphate pesticides.长期低剂量接触有机磷农药后出现的焦虑和抑郁
Environ Res. 2016 Nov;151:528-536. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.08.020. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
10
The Roles of Financial Threat, Social Support, Work Stress, and Mental Distress in Dairy Farmers' Expectations of Injury.财务威胁、社会支持、工作压力和精神压力在奶农对受伤的预期中的作用。
Front Public Health. 2016 Jun 21;4:126. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00126. eCollection 2016.