• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统腭大孔注射与新型气压振动触觉装置使用过程中疼痛感知的比较评估——体内研究

Comparative evaluation of pain perception during conventional greater palatine injections versus the use of a novel barovibrotactile device - In vivo study.

作者信息

Gangawane Aishwarya Avinash, Shah Sonal Bhavesh, Malankar Tanvi Eknath, Mathur Anmol, Ginde Shriya Shrirang, Lakshmi Priyanka Manne

机构信息

Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, India.

Dept. of Public Health Dentistry, Dr. D.Y Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, India.

出版信息

J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022 Sep-Oct;12(5):542-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.06.010. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.06.010
PMID:35866146
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9294554/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pain control by means of local anesthesia is an intrinsic part of clinical practice in dentistry. It is an irony that the modality used for pain free procedure itself is a source of fear & anxiety to the patient. Several modifications have been made to the injecting devices, local anesthetic solutions and techniques to render their administration comfortably. The objective of this study was thus designed to evaluate and compare anxiety and pain perception during conventional greater palatine injections versus use of a novel barovibrotactile device named Accupal to give painless anesthesia. This device has an additional attachment which works on Vibra-pulse technology thus minimizing pain during injection technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective, split mouth, open label, randomized, crossover clinical study was conducted on 50 patients coming to our institute whereby on one side Accupal was used during administration of local anesthesia. And on other side, traditional local anesthetic injection technique was used with one week of time interval.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was found as in the pain perception between the two techniques as per Visual Analogue Scale whereas no difference was seen in the anxiety levels as per the physiological parameters recorded by noninvasive blood pressure machine at various intervals.

CONCLUSION

The use of Accupal has thus proved to show better pain control as compared to traditional injection techniques of local anesthesia.

摘要

背景

通过局部麻醉进行疼痛控制是牙科临床实践的固有组成部分。具有讽刺意味的是,用于无痛手术的方式本身却成为患者恐惧和焦虑的来源。人们对注射装置、局部麻醉溶液和技术进行了多项改进,以使它们的给药过程更舒适。因此,本研究的目的是评估和比较传统腭大孔注射与使用名为Accupal的新型气压振动触觉装置进行无痛麻醉时的焦虑和疼痛感知。该装置有一个额外的附件,采用振动脉冲技术,从而在注射技术过程中最大限度地减少疼痛。

材料与方法

对来我院就诊的50例患者进行了一项前瞻性、双侧、开放标签、随机、交叉临床研究,在局部麻醉给药过程中,一侧使用Accupal,另一侧使用传统局部麻醉注射技术,时间间隔为一周。

结果

根据视觉模拟量表,两种技术在疼痛感知方面存在统计学上的显著差异,而根据无创血压计在不同时间间隔记录的生理参数,焦虑水平没有差异。

结论

与传统局部麻醉注射技术相比,Accupal的使用已被证明能更好地控制疼痛。

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of pain perception during conventional greater palatine injections versus the use of a novel barovibrotactile device - In vivo study.传统腭大孔注射与新型气压振动触觉装置使用过程中疼痛感知的比较评估——体内研究
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022 Sep-Oct;12(5):542-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.06.010. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
2
Evaluation of the Effect of Distant Cold Stimulation on Pain During Palatal Injection: A Randomized Split-Mouth Study.远隔冷刺激对上颌注射时疼痛影响的评估:一项随机双盲研究。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 18;15(4):e37749. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37749. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Single tooth anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia: a cross-over study.单牙麻醉与常规麻醉的比较:一项交叉研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Dec;22(9):3205-3213. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2413-2. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
4
Pain Perception: Computerized versus Traditional Local Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients.疼痛感知:儿科患者中计算机化局部麻醉与传统局部麻醉的比较
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Fall;39(5):470-4. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-39.5.470.
5
Comparison of pain perception during miniscrew placement in orthodontic patients with a visual analog scale survey between compound topical and needle-injected anesthetics: A crossover, prospective, randomized clinical trial.在正畸患者中使用视觉模拟量表调查比较复合外用麻醉剂和针剂注射麻醉剂在微螺钉植入过程中的疼痛感知:一项交叉、前瞻性、随机临床试验。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jan;149(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.08.013.
6
Evaluating anxiety levels and pain perception while administering local anesthesia using conventional, insulin, and deception syringes in 6-12-year-olds.在6至12岁儿童中使用传统注射器、胰岛素注射器和模拟注射器进行局部麻醉时评估焦虑水平和疼痛感知。
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Jun;22(3):197-204. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.3.197. Epub 2022 May 27.
7
Pain Perception Due to Dental Injection by Smartject: Split Mouth Design Study.Smartject牙科注射引起的疼痛感知:双盲设计研究。
J Dent (Shiraz). 2018 Mar;19(1):57-62.
8
A Comparison in Patient Comfort Using Conventional Syringe and Needleless Jet Anesthesia Technique in Periodontal Surgery-A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.常规注射器和无针喷射麻醉技术在牙周手术中患者舒适度的比较:一项分侧随机临床试验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Feb 12;58(2):278. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020278.
9
A comparative study of children's pain reactions and perceptions to AMSA injection using CCLAD versus traditional injections.一项关于使用CCLAD注射与传统注射时儿童对AMSA注射的疼痛反应和感知的对比研究。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010 Spring;34(3):217-22. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.34.3.3201l74255560520.
10
The effect of pre-cooling versus topical anesthesia on pain perception during palatal injections in children aged 7-9 years: a randomized split-mouth crossover clinical trial.7-9岁儿童腭部注射时预冷与表面麻醉对疼痛感知的影响:一项随机分口交叉临床试验
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Dec;20(6):377-386. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.6.377. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

本文引用的文献

1
DentalVibe reduces pain during the administration of local anesthetic injection in comparison to 2% lignocaine gel: results from a clinical study.与2%利多卡因凝胶相比,DentalVibe可减轻局部麻醉注射时的疼痛:一项临床研究的结果。
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Feb;21(1):41-47. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.1.41. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
2
Effect of vibratory stimulation on pain during local anesthesia injections: a clinical trial.振动刺激对局部麻醉注射时疼痛的影响:一项临床试验
Restor Dent Endod. 2019 Oct 24;44(4):e40. doi: 10.5395/rde.2019.44.e40. eCollection 2019 Nov.
3
A randomized clinical trial to compare pain levels during three types of oral anesthetic injections and the effect of Dentalvibe on injection pain in children.一项比较三种口腔麻醉注射方式在儿童中引起的疼痛程度以及 Dentalvibe 对注射疼痛影响的随机临床试验。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Jan;28(1):102-110. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12313. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
4
Comparison of onset anesthesia time and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine during teeth extractions.4%阿替卡因与2%甲哌卡因在拔牙术中麻醉起效时间及注射疼痛的比较
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 Apr-Jun;11(2):152-157. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.203017.
5
Evaluation of the injection pain with the use of DentalVibe injection system during supraperiosteal anaesthesia in children: a randomised clinical trial.使用DentalVibe注射系统在儿童骨膜上麻醉期间评估注射疼痛:一项随机临床试验。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Sep;26(5):336-45. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12204. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
6
Effectiveness of new vibration delivery system on pain associated with injection of local anesthesia in children.新型振动传递系统对儿童局部麻醉注射相关疼痛的疗效
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015 Jul-Sep;33(3):173-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.160343.
7
Advances in dental local anesthesia techniques and devices: An update.牙科局部麻醉技术与设备的进展:最新情况
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jan;4(1):19-24. doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.117873.
8
Advances in local anesthesia in dentistry.牙科局部麻醉的进展。
Dent Clin North Am. 2011 Jul;55(3):481-99, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2011.02.007.
9
Evaluation of the effects of the VibraJect attachment on pain in children receiving local anesthesia.评估VibraJect附件对接受局部麻醉的儿童疼痛的影响。
Pediatr Dent. 2011 Jan-Feb;33(1):46-50.
10
The effect of vibration on pain during local anaesthesia injections.局部麻醉注射时振动对疼痛的影响。
Aust Dent J. 2009 Jun;54(2):94-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01100.x.