Joshi Sagar, Bhate Kalyani, Kshirsagar Kapil, Pawar Vivek, Kakodkar Pradnya
Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth. Pimpri, Pune, India.
Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, D. Y. Patil Dental School, Charoli Bk, Lohegaon, Pune, India.
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Feb;21(1):41-47. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.1.41. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
This study was designed to compare the efficacy of DentalVibe against 2% lidocaine gel in reducing pain during the administration of local anesthetic injection in the adult population.
This was a split-mouth open-label, randomized, controlled clinical study conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of a dental institute. Fifty patients who were scheduled for bilateral dental extractions requiring an inferior alveolar nerve block were enrolled in the study. Site A (n = 50) was coated with 2% lidocaine gel followed by a local anesthetic injection, and DentalVibe with local anesthetic injection was used for Site B (n = 50). The primary outcome was pain, which was recorded immediately after the administration of anesthetic injection using the Visual Analogue Scale [VAS 0 - 10].
The VAS pain scores ranged from 4 to 10 for site A and 0 to 6 for site B. Comparison between the two sites showed a statistically significant difference [Mann-Whitney U test value = 51.50, P < 0.001] favoring site B.
This study showed that DentalVibe reduces pain during injection of local anesthesia compared to topical anesthetic gel.
本研究旨在比较DentalVibe与2%利多卡因凝胶在减轻成年人群局部麻醉注射过程中疼痛方面的疗效。
这是一项在牙科机构口腔颌面外科进行的半口开放标签、随机对照临床研究。50例计划进行双侧拔牙且需要下牙槽神经阻滞的患者纳入研究。A组(n = 50)先涂抹2%利多卡因凝胶,然后进行局部麻醉注射,B组(n = 50)使用DentalVibe并进行局部麻醉注射。主要观察指标为疼痛,在麻醉注射后立即使用视觉模拟量表[VAS 0 - 10]记录。
A组VAS疼痛评分范围为4至10分,B组为0至6分。两组之间的比较显示出统计学上的显著差异[曼-惠特尼U检验值 = 51.50,P < 0.001],支持B组。
本研究表明,与局部麻醉凝胶相比,DentalVibe可减轻局部麻醉注射过程中的疼痛。