Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guilford GU2 7AL, United Kingdom.
Stucture & Motion Laboratory, Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, United Kingdom.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jul 12;119(28):e2108471119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108471119. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
Giraffes () possess specialized locomotor morphology, namely elongate and gracile distal limbs. While this contributes to their overall height and enhances feeding behavior, we propose that the combination of long limb segments and modest muscle lever arms results in low effective mechanical advantage (EMA, the ratio of in-lever to out-lever moment arms), when compared with other cursorial mammals. To test this, we used a combination of experimentally measured kinematics and ground reaction forces (GRFs), musculoskeletal modeling, and inverse dynamics to calculate giraffe forelimb EMA during walking. Giraffes walk with an EMA of 0.34 (±0.05 SD), with no evident association with speed within their walking gait. Giraffe EMA was about four times lower than expectations extrapolated from other mammals, ranging from 0.03 to 297 kg, and this provides further evidence that EMA plateaus or even diminishes in mammals exceeding horse size. We further tested the idea that limb segment length is a factor which determines EMA, by modeling the GRF and muscle moment arms in the extinct giraffid and the other extant giraffid, and shared similar EMA, despite a four to sixfold difference in body mass ( EMA = 0.38). In contrast, sharing a similar body mass with had greater EMA (0.59), which we propose reflects behavioral differences, such as a somewhat increased capability for athletic performance. Our modeling approach suggests that limb length is a determinant of GRF moment arm magnitude and that unless muscle moment arms scale isometrically with limb length, tall mammals are prone to low EMA.
长颈鹿()具有专门的运动形态,即长而纤细的四肢。虽然这有助于它们的整体身高,并增强了它们的进食行为,但我们提出,与其他奔跑哺乳动物相比,长肢段和适度的肌肉杠杆臂组合导致了低的有效机械优势(EMA,内臂到外臂力矩臂的比率)。为了验证这一点,我们使用了实验测量的运动学和地面反作用力(GRF)、肌肉骨骼建模和逆动力学的组合,来计算长颈鹿行走时的前肢 EMA。长颈鹿的 EMA 为 0.34(±0.05 SD),在它们的行走步态中与速度没有明显的关联。长颈鹿的 EMA 比从其他哺乳动物推断出的预期值低约四倍,范围从 0.03 到 297 公斤,这进一步证明了 EMA 在超过马大小的哺乳动物中趋于平稳甚至减小的观点。我们通过对已灭绝的长颈鹿和其他现存的长颈鹿和进行 GRF 和肌肉力矩臂建模,进一步测试了肢体段长度是决定 EMA 的一个因素的观点,尽管它们的体重相差四到六倍(EMA = 0.38)。相比之下,与体型相似的共享更大的 EMA(0.59),我们提出这反映了行为上的差异,例如在运动表现方面略有提高的能力。我们的建模方法表明,肢体长度是 GRF 力矩臂大小的决定因素,除非肌肉力矩臂与肢体长度按比例缩放,否则高个子哺乳动物容易出现低 EMA。