Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Via Albertoni 15, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy.
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2022 Oct;39(5):743-755. doi: 10.1007/s10585-022-10180-9. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
The main treatment of MM metastases are systemic therapies, surgery, limb perfusion, and intralesional talimogene laherparepvec. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is potentially useful also due to the high response rates recorded in cancers of any histology. No randomized studies comparing ECT with other local therapies have been published on this topic. We analyzed the available evidence on efficacy and toxicity of ECT in this setting. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were screened for paper about ECT on MM skin metastases. Data about tumor response, mainly in terms of overall response rate (ORR), toxicity (both for ECT alone and in combination with systemic treatments), local control (LC), and overall survival (OS) were collected. The methodological quality was assessed using a 20-item validated quality appraisal tool for case series. Overall, 18 studies were included in our analysis. In studies reporting "per patient" tumor response the pooled complete response (CR) was 35.7% (95%CI 26.0-46.0%), and the pooled ORR was 80.6% (95%CI 68.7-90.1%). Regarding "per lesion" response, the pooled CR was 53.5% (95%CI 42.1-64.7%) and the pooled ORR was 77.0% (95%CI 56.0-92.6%). One-year LC rate was 80%, and 1-year OS was 67-86.2%. Pain (24.2-92.0%) and erythema (16.6-42.0%) were the most frequent toxicities. Two studies reported 29.2% and 41.6% incidence of necrosis. ECT is effective in terms of tumor response and tolerated in patients with skin metastases from MM, albeit with a wide variability of reported results. Therefore, prospective trials in this setting are warranted.
多发性骨髓瘤(MM)转移的主要治疗方法是系统治疗、手术、肢体灌注和局部注射替莫唑胺拉帕替拉韦。电化学疗法(ECT)也具有潜在的作用,因为在任何组织学癌症中都记录了高反应率。在这个主题上,还没有发表比较 ECT 与其他局部治疗的随机研究。我们分析了关于 ECT 在这种情况下的疗效和毒性的现有证据。我们在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Cochrane 数据库中筛选了关于 ECT 治疗 MM 皮肤转移的论文。收集了有关肿瘤反应的数据,主要是总体反应率(ORR)、毒性(ECT 单独使用和与系统治疗联合使用)、局部控制(LC)和总生存(OS)。使用 20 项经过验证的病例系列质量评估工具评估方法学质量。我们共纳入了 18 项研究。在报告“每位患者”肿瘤反应的研究中,完全缓解(CR)的合并率为 35.7%(95%CI 26.0-46.0%),总反应率(ORR)为 80.6%(95%CI 68.7-90.1%)。关于“每病灶”反应,合并的 CR 为 53.5%(95%CI 42.1-64.7%),合并的 ORR 为 77.0%(95%CI 56.0-92.6%)。1 年 LC 率为 80%,1 年 OS 为 67-86.2%。疼痛(24.2-92.0%)和红斑(16.6-42.0%)是最常见的毒性反应。两项研究报告了 29.2%和 41.6%的坏死发生率。ECT 在治疗 MM 皮肤转移方面具有疗效,且可耐受,尽管报告的结果存在较大差异。因此,在这种情况下,需要进行前瞻性试验。