School of Allied Health and Community, The University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.
School of Science and the Environment, The University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5176-e5185. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13935. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
Social prescribing (SP) has rapidly expanded over recent years. Previously a bottom-up, community-led phenomenon, SP is now a formal part of structured NHS policy and practice. This study was designed to ascertain how general practitioners and other primary healthcare professionals (HCPs) within one clinical commissioning group (CCG) perceive and engage with this new NHS model. The research comprised an online survey distributed to HCPs within a predominately rural, English CCG between June and August 2021. Qualitative data were gathered and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Positive portrayals of SP were found, although definitions and perceptions varied greatly. Many HCPs reported high levels of engagement with SP services; yet referral rates appeared to remain significantly lower than the previously estimated 20% of primary care attendees referred for social reasons. Moreover, 96% of HCPs reported signposting patients directly to community or external services, rather than referring them to SP. This signposting, which has been positioned as a model of SP, reflects engagement with SP in practice, which is likely to have pre-dated the introduction of the fuller NHS model. HCPs may be unaware that this could be classed as a social prescription, and this type of SP remains uncaptured within NHS statistics. These results indicate an underuse of the national system set up to deliver one particular model of SP, rather than that SP does not occur. Additionally, despite national guidance issued to accompany the NHS model, practices such as referral and feedback processes, and link worker presence within practices, were not uniform even within this single CCG. Nevertheless, understanding is increasing as SP becomes embedded within primary care. The lack of consistency in referrals between practices warrants further examination in terms of equity of service choices to patients, as does the very low self-reported referral rate to SP.
社会处方(SP)近年来迅速发展。SP 以前是一种自下而上的、社区主导的现象,现在已成为英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)正式政策和实践的一部分。本研究旨在了解一个临床委托组(CCG)内的全科医生和其他初级保健专业人员(HCPs)如何看待和参与这种新的 NHS 模式。该研究包括 2021 年 6 月至 8 月期间向一个以农村为主的英国 CCG 内的 HCPs 分发在线调查。使用反思性主题分析收集和分析定性数据。发现了对 SP 的积极描述,尽管定义和看法存在很大差异。许多 HCPs 报告说他们高度参与 SP 服务;然而,转诊率似乎仍然明显低于之前估计的 20%因社会原因转诊的初级保健就诊者。此外,96%的 HCPs 报告说他们直接将患者转介到社区或外部服务,而不是将他们转介到 SP。这种转介被定位为 SP 的一种模式,反映了实践中对 SP 的参与,这可能早于 NHS 更全面模式的引入。HCPs 可能没有意识到这可能被归类为社会处方,并且这种类型的 SP 在 NHS 统计数据中未被捕获。这些结果表明,国家系统没有充分利用来提供一种特定模式的 SP,而不是 SP 不存在。此外,尽管 NHS 模式附带了国家指南,但即使在单个 CCG 内,转诊和反馈流程等实践以及实践内联络工作者的存在也不统一。尽管如此,随着 SP 嵌入到初级保健中,对其的理解正在增加。实践之间转诊缺乏一致性,这在为患者提供服务选择的公平性方面值得进一步研究,因为自我报告的 SP 转诊率非常低也是如此。