• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高萨默塞特国民保健制度基金会信托中治疗升级计划的可见性和沟通效果。

Improving the visibility and communication of treatment escalation plans in Somerset NHS foundation trust.

机构信息

Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury, UK.

Great Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, UK.

出版信息

Int J Risk Saf Med. 2022;33(S1):S69-S72. doi: 10.3233/JRS-227027.

DOI:10.3233/JRS-227027
PMID:35871371
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9844060/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advance care treatment escalation plans (TEPs) are often lost between healthcare settings, leading to duplication of work and loss of patient autonomy.

OBJECTIVE

This quality improvement project reviewed the usage of TEP forms and aimed to improve completeness of documentation and visibility between admissions.

METHODS

Over four months we monitored TEP form documentation using a standardised data extraction form. This examined section completion, seniority of documenting clinician and transfer of forms to our hospital electronic patient record (EPRO). We added reminders to computer monitors on wards to improve EPRO upload.

RESULTS

Initial data demonstrated that 95% of patients (n = 230) had a TEP, with 99% of TEPs recording resuscitation status. However, other sections were not well documented (patient capacity 57% completion and personal priorities 45% completion, respectively). Only 11.9% of TEPs documented consultant involvement. Furthermore, only 44% of TEPs with a do not attempt resuscitation (DNACPR) decision were uploaded. Following this, we added reminders to computer monitors explaining how to upload TEP decisions to EPRO, which increased EPRO uploads to 74%.

CONCLUSION

Communication of TEPs needs improving across healthcare settings. This project showed that the use of a physical reminder can greatly improve communication of treatment escalation decisions. Furthermore, this intervention has inspired future projects aiming at making communication more sustainable through the use of discharge summaries.

摘要

背景

在医疗机构之间,高级医疗护理治疗计划(TEP)经常丢失,导致工作重复和患者自主权丧失。

目的

本质量改进项目审查了 TEP 表格的使用情况,旨在提高文档记录的完整性和入院期间的可见性。

方法

在四个月的时间里,我们使用标准化的数据提取表格监测 TEP 表格的文档记录情况。这检查了部分完成情况、记录医生的资历以及表格是否转至我们医院的电子病历(EPR)。我们在病房的计算机监视器上添加了提醒,以改进 EPRO 的上传。

结果

初步数据表明,95%的患者(n=230)有 TEP,99%的 TEP 记录了复苏状态。然而,其他部分记录不完整(患者能力记录完成率为 57%,个人优先事项记录完成率为 45%)。只有 11.9%的 TEP 记录了顾问的参与。此外,只有 44%的有不进行心肺复苏(DNACPR)决定的 TEP 被上传。在此之后,我们在计算机监视器上添加了提醒,解释如何将 TEP 决策上传至 EPRO,这将 EPRO 的上传率提高到了 74%。

结论

需要改善医疗保健环境之间的 TEP 沟通。该项目表明,使用物理提醒可以大大改善治疗升级决策的沟通。此外,这一干预措施激发了未来的项目,旨在通过使用出院小结使沟通更加可持续。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a08b/9844060/b2f4151e3932/jrs-33-jrs227027-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a08b/9844060/b2f4151e3932/jrs-33-jrs227027-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a08b/9844060/b2f4151e3932/jrs-33-jrs227027-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving the visibility and communication of treatment escalation plans in Somerset NHS foundation trust.提高萨默塞特国民保健制度基金会信托中治疗升级计划的可见性和沟通效果。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2022;33(S1):S69-S72. doi: 10.3233/JRS-227027.
2
Improving resuscitation decisions: a trust-wide initiative.改善复苏决策:一项全信托机构的倡议。
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Nov 1;7(4):e000268. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000268. eCollection 2018.
3
A Unified Electronic Tool for CPR and Emergency Treatment Escalation Plans Improves Communication and Early Collaborative Decision Making for Acute Hospital Admissions.一种用于心肺复苏和紧急治疗升级计划的统一电子工具可改善急性医院入院患者的沟通和早期协作决策。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2017 Apr 25;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u213254.w6626. eCollection 2017.
4
Reducing DNACPR complaints to zero: designing and implementing a treatment escalation plan using quality improvement methodology.将“不要尝试心肺复苏”(DNACPR)投诉降至零:运用质量改进方法设计并实施治疗升级计划。
BMJ Open Qual. 2017 Sep 4;6(2):e000011. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000011. eCollection 2017.
5
6
From paper to paperless: Do electronic systems ensure safe and effective communication and documentation of DNACPR decisions?从纸质到无纸化:电子系统是否能确保 DNACPR 决策的安全有效沟通和记录?
Clin Med (Lond). 2020 May;20(3):329-333. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0450.
7
Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation documentation: a quality improvement project.不要尝试进行心肺复苏记录:一项质量改进项目。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 May 31. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2022-004133.
8
Implementation of treatment escalation plans in an old age psychiatry inpatient hospital.老年精神病学住院医院中治疗升级计划的实施。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Dec;10(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001640.
9
Documentation of resuscitation decision-making: a survey of practice in the United Kingdom.复苏决策记录:英国实践调查
Resuscitation. 2014 May;85(5):606-11. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
10
Implementation of a combined Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Treatment Escalation Plan document in a District General Hospital.在一家区综合医院实施心肺复苏与治疗升级计划文件
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2013 Dec 9;2(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u202653.w1236. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving the use of treatment escalation plans: a quality-improvement study.改善治疗升级计划的使用:一项质量改进研究。
Postgrad Med J. 2018 Jul;94(1113):404-410. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-135699. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
2
Improving documentation of treatment escalation decisions in acute care.改善急性护理中治疗升级决策的记录。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2013 Aug 21;2(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u200617.w1077. eCollection 2013.
3
Variation in local trust Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) policies: a review of 48 English healthcare trusts.
当地“不要尝试心肺复苏”(DNACPR)政策的差异:对48家英国医疗信托机构的回顾
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 13;5(1):e006517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006517.
4
Characteristics and outcome of patients with DNACPR orders in an acute hospital; an observational study.有 DNACPR 医嘱的患者在急性医院的特征和结局;一项观察性研究。
Resuscitation. 2014 Jan;85(1):104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
5
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: capacity, discussion and documentation.心肺复苏:能力、讨论与记录。
QJM. 2006 Oct;99(10):683-90. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcl095. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
6
Pre-printed 'do not attempt resuscitation' forms improve documentation?预先印制的“不要尝试心肺复苏”表格能改善记录情况吗?
Resuscitation. 2003 Oct;59(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00176-x.
7
Improving decision-making and documentation relating to do not attempt resuscitation orders.改善与不进行心肺复苏医嘱相关的决策制定和文件记录。
Resuscitation. 2003 May;57(2):139-44. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00029-7.