Radiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Radiol Med. 2022 Sep;127(9):1046-1058. doi: 10.1007/s11547-022-01520-6. Epub 2022 Jul 24.
The number of oncological patients who may benefit from proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) or carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), overall referred to as particle radiotherapy (RT), is expected to strongly increase in the next future, as well as the number of cardiological patients requiring cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The management of patients with a CIED requiring particle RT deserves peculiar attention compared to those undergoing conventional photon beam RT, mostly due to the potential generation of secondary neutrons by particle beams interactions. Current consensus documents recommend managing these patients as being at intermediate/high risk of RT-induced device malfunctioning regardless of the dose on the CIED and the beam delivery method used, despite the last one significantly affects secondary neutrons generation (very limited neutrons production with active scanning as opposed to the passive scattering technique). The key issues for the current review were expressed in four questions according to the Population, Intervention, Control, Outcome criteria. Three in vitro and five in vivo studies were included. Based on the available data, PBT and CIRT with active scanning have a limited potential to interfere with CIED that has only emerged from in vitro study so far, while a significant potential for neutron-related, not severe, CIED malfunctions (resets) was consistently reported in both clinical and in vitro studies with passive scattering.
预计在未来,需要接受质子束放射治疗(PBT)或碳离子放射治疗(CIRT)(总体上称为粒子放射治疗(RT))的肿瘤患者数量以及需要心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)的心脏病患者数量将会大幅增加。与接受常规光子束 RT 的患者相比,需要粒子 RT 的 CIED 患者的管理需要特别注意,这主要是因为粒子束相互作用会产生继发性中子。目前的共识文件建议,无论 CIED 上的剂量和使用的射束输送方法如何,将这些患者管理为具有中/高度 RT 诱导的设备故障风险,尽管后者会显著影响继发性中子的产生(与被动散射技术相比,主动扫描产生的中子非常有限)。根据人群、干预、对照、结果标准,当前综述的关键问题用四个问题来表示。纳入了三项体外研究和五项体内研究。根据现有数据,到目前为止,仅从体外研究中发现,主动扫描的 PBT 和 CIRT 对 CIED 具有有限的干扰潜力,而在被动散射的临床和体外研究中,都一致报告了与中子相关但不严重的 CIED 故障(重置)的显著潜力。