Suppr超能文献

针对植入心脏电子设备(CIED)的癌症患者,使用质子或碳离子进行粒子治疗:一项回顾性多机构研究。

Particle therapy using protons or carbon ions for cancer patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED): a retrospective multi-institutional study.

作者信息

Hashimoto Takayuki, Demizu Yusuke, Numajiri Haruko, Isobe Tomonori, Fukuda Shigekazu, Wakatsuki Masaru, Yamashita Haruo, Murayama Shigeyuki, Takamatsu Shigeyuki, Katoh Hiroyuki, Murata Kazutoshi, Kohno Ryosuke, Arimura Takeshi, Matsuura Taeko, Ito Yoichi M

机构信息

Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North 15 West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.

Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, 1-2-1 Kouto, Shingu-cho, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Radiol. 2022 May;40(5):525-533. doi: 10.1007/s11604-021-01218-1. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of particle therapy in cancer patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 2001 to March 2013, 19,585 patients were treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) or carbon ion therapy (CIT) at 8 institutions. Of these, 69 patients (0.4%, PBT 46, CIT 22, and PBT + CIT 1) with CIEDs (64 pacemakers, 4 implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and 1 with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator) were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients with CIEDs in this study were treated with the passive scattering type of particle beam therapy.

RESULTS

Six (13%) of the 47 PBT patients, and none of the 23 CIT patients experienced CIED malfunctions (p = 0.105). Electrical resets (7) and over-sensing (3) occurred transiently in 6 patients. The distance between the edge of the irradiation field and the CIED was not associated with the incidence of malfunctions in 20 patients with lung cancer. A larger field size had a higher event rate but the test to evaluate trends as not statistically significant (p = 0.196).

CONCLUSION

Differences in the frequency of occurrence of device malfunctions for patients treated with PBT and patients treated with CIT did not reach statistical significance. The present study can be regarded as a benchmark study about the incidence of malfunctioning of CIED in passive scattering particle beam therapy and can be used as a reference for active scanning particle beam therapy.

摘要

目的

评估心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)癌症患者接受粒子治疗的效果。

材料与方法

2001年4月至2013年3月,8家机构对19585例患者进行了质子束治疗(PBT)或碳离子治疗(CIT)。其中,对69例(0.4%,PBT 46例、CIT 22例、PBT + CIT 1例)植入CIED的患者(64例起搏器、4例植入式心律转复除颤器、1例心脏再同步治疗除颤器)进行了回顾性分析。本研究中所有植入CIED的患者均接受了被动散射型粒子束治疗。

结果

47例PBT患者中有6例(13%)出现CIED故障,23例CIT患者均未出现CIED故障(p = 0.105)。6例患者出现了短暂的电重置(7次)和过感知(3次)。在20例肺癌患者中,照射野边缘与CIED之间的距离与故障发生率无关。较大的照射野尺寸事件发生率更高,但评估趋势的检验无统计学意义(p = 0.196)。

结论

PBT治疗患者和CIT治疗患者的设备故障发生频率差异未达到统计学意义。本研究可视为被动散射粒子束治疗中CIED故障发生率的基准研究,可为主动扫描粒子束治疗提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd97/9068656/830eccc56701/11604_2021_1218_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验