• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立公众对卫生系统中个人数据使用信任的循证指导原则。

Evidence-based guiding principles to build public trust in personal data use in health systems.

作者信息

Gille Felix, Smith Sarah, Mays Nicholas

机构信息

University of Zurich, Digital Society Initiative (DSI), Zürich, CH, Switzerland.

University of Zurich, Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), Zürich, CH, Switzerland.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2022 Jul 17;8:20552076221111947. doi: 10.1177/20552076221111947. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076221111947
PMID:35874863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9297454/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Public trust in health systems is pivotal for their effective and efficient functioning. In particular, public trust is essential for personal data use, as demonstrated in debates in many countries, for example, about whether data from COVID-19 contact tracing apps should be pooled or remain on individuals' smartphones. Low levels of public trust pose a risk not only to health system legitimacy but can also harm population health.

METHODS

Synthesising our previous qualitative and theoretical research in the English National Health Service which enabled us to conceptualise the nature of public trust in health systems, we present guiding principles designed to rebuild public trust, if lost, and to maintain high levels of public trust in personal data use within the health system, if not.

RESULTS

To build public trust, health system actors need to not rush trust building; engage with the public; keep the public safe; offer autonomy to the public; plan for diverse trust relationships; recognise that trust is shaped by both emotion and rational thought; represent the public interest; and work towards realising a net benefit for the health system and the public.

CONCLUSIONS

Beyond policymakers and government officials, the guiding principles address a wide range of actors within health systems so that they can work collectively to build public trust. The guiding principles can be used to inform policymaking in health and health care and to analyse the performance of different governments to see if those governments that operate in greater conformity with the guiding principles perform better.

摘要

目的

公众对卫生系统的信任对于其有效且高效运行至关重要。特别是,公众信任对于个人数据的使用至关重要,正如许多国家的辩论所表明的那样,例如,关于来自新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序的数据是否应该汇总或保留在个人智能手机上。公众信任水平低不仅会对卫生系统的合法性构成风险,还可能损害民众健康。

方法

综合我们之前在英国国家医疗服务体系中进行的定性和理论研究,这些研究使我们能够对公众对卫生系统信任的本质进行概念化,我们提出了旨在重建公众信任(如果失去的话)以及在卫生系统内维持对个人数据使用的高度公众信任(如果尚未失去的话)的指导原则。

结果

为了建立公众信任,卫生系统行为者需要不急于建立信任;与公众互动;保障公众安全;给予公众自主权;规划多样化的信任关系;认识到信任是由情感和理性思维共同塑造的;代表公众利益;并努力为卫生系统和公众实现净收益。

结论

除了政策制定者和政府官员之外,这些指导原则还涉及卫生系统内的广泛行为者,以便他们能够共同努力建立公众信任。这些指导原则可用于为卫生和医疗保健政策制定提供信息,并分析不同政府的表现,以查看那些更符合指导原则运作的政府是否表现更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b23f/9297454/7247f54cbf01/10.1177_20552076221111947-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b23f/9297454/7247f54cbf01/10.1177_20552076221111947-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b23f/9297454/7247f54cbf01/10.1177_20552076221111947-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence-based guiding principles to build public trust in personal data use in health systems.建立公众对卫生系统中个人数据使用信任的循证指导原则。
Digit Health. 2022 Jul 17;8:20552076221111947. doi: 10.1177/20552076221111947. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
2
What is public trust in national electronic health record systems? A scoping review of qualitative research studies from 1995 to 2021.公众对国家电子健康记录系统的信任度如何?对1995年至2021年定性研究的范围综述。
Digit Health. 2024 Jan 28;10:20552076241228024. doi: 10.1177/20552076241228024. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Qualitative evidence synthesis informing our understanding of people's perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication.定性证据综合分析有助于我们理解人们对定向数字通信的认知和体验。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 23;10(10):ED000141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000141.
4
Limits of data anonymity: lack of public awareness risks trust in health system activities.数据匿名的局限性:公众意识的缺乏可能会影响对卫生系统活动的信任。
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2021 Jul 26;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40504-021-00115-9.
5
The role of mGovernment applications in building trust during public crises: Evidence from the COVID-19 epidemic.移动政务应用在公共危机期间建立信任方面的作用:来自新冠疫情的证据。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 13;10(12):e32476. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32476. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
6
The challenges in protecting public health interests in multisectoral governance in the context of small island developing states: the case of tobacco control in Fiji and Vanuatu.多部门治理中小岛屿发展中国家保护公共卫生利益面临的挑战:以斐济和瓦努阿图的烟草控制为例。
Global Health. 2023 Apr 28;19(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00931-y.
7
Understanding Trust and Changes in Use After a Year With the NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in the United Kingdom: Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study.理解信任和在英国使用 NHS COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序一年后的变化:纵向混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 14;24(10):e40558. doi: 10.2196/40558.
8
Exploring health researchers' perceptions of policymaking in Argentina: a qualitative study.探索阿根廷卫生研究人员对政策制定的看法:一项定性研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Sep;29 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii40-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu071.
9
10
Building patient trust in health systems: A qualitative study of facework in the context of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Worker role in Queensland, Australia.建立患者对卫生系统的信任:对澳大利亚昆士兰州原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民卫生工作者角色背景下的面子工作的定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jun;302:114984. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114984. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolutionary game analysis of healthcare data governance in China's experimental data trading pilots.中国实验性数据交易试点中医疗数据治理的演化博弈分析
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Sep 1;8(1):562. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01950-2.
2
AI, neurotechnology and society - a question of trust.人工智能、神经技术与社会——信任问题。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1038/s41582-025-01114-6.
3
Evaluating stakeholder coordination and partnerships for NTD elimination in Taraba state, Nigeria: a multi-level analysis.评估尼日利亚塔拉巴州消除被忽视热带病中的利益相关者协调与伙伴关系:多层次分析

本文引用的文献

1
Trust in Healthcare during COVID-19 in Europe: vulnerable groups trust the least.欧洲新冠疫情期间对医疗保健的信任:弱势群体信任度最低。
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2022 Mar 24:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10389-022-01705-3.
2
Trust and digital privacy in healthcare: a cross-sectional descriptive study of trust and attitudes towards uses of electronic health data among the general public in Sweden.信任与医疗保健中的数字隐私:瑞典普通公众对电子健康数据使用的信任和态度的横断面描述性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Mar 4;23(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00758-z.
3
Pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: an exploratory analysis of infection and fatality rates, and contextual factors associated with preparedness in 177 countries, from Jan 1, 2020, to Sept 30, 2021.
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10553-x.
4
PTSD and challenges among older Chinese in Shenzhen during COVID-19 pandemic: Trust in authority and medical professionals as moderators.新冠疫情期间深圳老年华人的创伤后应激障碍及挑战:以对权威和医疗专业人员的信任作为调节因素
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025 Jan 9;26:e2. doi: 10.1017/S1463423624000641.
5
Evaluations of digital public health interventions in the WHO Southeast Asia Region: a systematic literature review.世界卫生组织东南亚区域数字公共卫生干预措施的评估:一项系统文献综述
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Dec 18;40(1):e78. doi: 10.1017/S026646232400045X.
6
Building and Sustaining Public Trust in Health Data Sharing for Musculoskeletal Research: Semistructured Interview and Focus Group Study.构建和维护公众对肌肉骨骼研究健康数据共享的信任:半结构化访谈和焦点小组研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 15;26:e53024. doi: 10.2196/53024.
7
Understanding how to build a social licence for using novel linked datasets for planning and research in Kent, Surrey and Sussex: results of deliberative focus groups.理解如何为肯特、萨里和苏塞克斯使用新型关联数据集进行规划和研究建立社会许可:深思熟虑的焦点小组的结果。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2023 Jan 30;5(3):2114. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i3.2114. eCollection 2020.
8
Video Recording Patients for Direct Care Purposes: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of International Empirical Studies and UK Professional Guidance.为直接护理目的录制患者视频:国际实证研究和英国专业指南的系统回顾和叙述性综合。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 16;25:e46478. doi: 10.2196/46478.
大流行防范与新冠疫情:对2020年1月1日至2021年9月30日期间177个国家的感染率、死亡率以及与防范相关的背景因素进行的探索性分析。
Lancet. 2022 Apr 16;399(10334):1489-1512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00172-6. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
4
Does higher health literacy lead to higher trust in public hospitals?较高的健康素养是否会导致对公立医院的更高信任?
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Sep 16;20(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01528-w.
5
Limits of data anonymity: lack of public awareness risks trust in health system activities.数据匿名的局限性:公众意识的缺乏可能会影响对卫生系统活动的信任。
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2021 Jul 26;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40504-021-00115-9.
6
Intentional machines: A defence of trust in medical artificial intelligence.有意机器:对医疗人工智能的信任辩护。
Bioethics. 2022 Feb;36(2):154-161. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12891. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
7
Covid-19: One in five government contracts had signs of possible corruption, report finds.
BMJ. 2021 Apr 23;373:n1072. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1072.
8
Trust in government regarding COVID-19 and its associations with preventive health behaviour and prosocial behaviour during the pandemic: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.民众对政府在 COVID-19 方面的信任及其与大流行期间预防保健行为和亲社会行为的关系:一项横断面和纵向研究。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jan;53(1):149-159. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001306. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
9
Can we know if donor trust expires? About trust relationships and time in the context of open consent for future data use.我们能否知道捐赠者的信任是否过期?关于开放同意未来数据使用的背景下的信任关系和时间。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Mar;48(3):184-188. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106244. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
10
What's next for COVID-19 apps? Governance and oversight.新冠病毒应用程序的下一步是什么?治理与监督。
Science. 2020 Nov 13;370(6518):760-762. doi: 10.1126/science.abd9006.