Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Sep 12;29(10):1818-1822. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac112.
Recent legislation ensuring patient access to their electronic health records represents a promising national commitment to patient empowerment. Access and interoperability rules seek to empower individuals as well as increase opportunities for data sharing by hospitals, apps, and other parties for research and innovation. However, there are trade-offs between data accessibility and oversight. Some third-party apps may not be covered by federal regulations, and receiving records directly from individuals may render some services in possession of health data. To promote consumer trust, these services should follow ethical standards regardless of regulatory status.
This Perspective proposes 3 actionable principles, grounded in medical ethics, for services making use of health data: services should (1) provide informed, dynamic, regular consent, including control over data sharing, (2) promote inclusivity and equity, and (3) intentionally focus on consumer trust and the perception of value in the service provided.
最近的立法确保了患者访问其电子健康记录的权利,这代表了国家对赋予患者权力的有力承诺。访问和互操作性规则旨在赋予个人权力,并为医院、应用程序和其他各方增加数据共享的机会,以进行研究和创新。然而,在数据可访问性和监管之间存在权衡。一些第三方应用程序可能不受联邦法规的约束,而直接从个人接收记录可能会使一些拥有健康数据的服务受益。为了促进消费者信任,无论监管状况如何,这些服务都应遵循道德标准。
本观点提出了 3 条基于医学伦理的可操作原则,用于使用健康数据的服务:服务应(1)提供知情、动态、定期的同意,包括对数据共享的控制,(2)促进包容性和公平性,以及(3)专注于消费者信任和服务提供的价值感知。