Suppr超能文献

固定强度运动的不同持续时间对内部负荷和恢复的影响——一项将持续时间作为运动处方自变量的可行性初步研究

Effects of Different Durations at Fixed Intensity Exercise on Internal Load and Recovery-A Feasibility Pilot Study on Duration as an Independent Variable for Exercise Prescription.

作者信息

Birnbaumer Philipp, Weiner Lena, Handl Tanja, Tschakert Gerhard, Hofmann Peter

机构信息

Exercise Physiology, Training & Training Therapy Research Group, Institute of Human Movement Science, Sport & Health, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.

出版信息

J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2022 Jul 21;7(3):54. doi: 10.3390/jfmk7030054.

Abstract

Duration is a rarely investigated marker of exercise prescription. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of the methodological approach, assessing effects of different duration constant-load exercise (CLE) on physiological responses (internal load) and recovery kinetics. Seven subjects performed an incremental exercise (IE) test, one maximal duration CLE at 77.6 ± 4.8% V˙O2max, and CLE's at 20%, 40%, and 70% of maximum duration. Heart rate (HR), blood lactate (La), and glucose (Glu) concentrations were measured. Before, 4, 24, and 48 h after CLE's, submaximal IE tests were performed. HR variability (HRV) was assessed in orthostatic tests (OT). Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was obtained during all tests. CLE's were performed at 182 ± 27 W. HR, La, V˙Epeak, and RPE were significantly higher in CLE's with longer duration. No significant differences were found between CLE's for recovery kinetics for HR, La, and Glu in the submaximal IE and for HRV or OT. Despite no significant differences, recovery kinetics were found as expected, indicating the feasibility of the applied methods. Maximum tests and recovery tests closer to CLE's termination are suggested to better display recovery kinetics. These findings are a first step to prescription of exercise by both intensity and duration on an individual basis.

摘要

运动时长是运动处方中一个很少被研究的指标。本研究的目的是测试该方法的可行性,评估不同时长的恒定负荷运动(CLE)对生理反应(内部负荷)和恢复动力学的影响。七名受试者进行了递增运动(IE)测试、一次在77.6±4.8%最大摄氧量下的最大时长CLE,以及最大时长20%、40%和70%的CLE。测量了心率(HR)、血乳酸(La)和葡萄糖(Glu)浓度。在CLE之前、之后4小时、24小时和48小时进行次最大强度IE测试。在直立试验(OT)中评估心率变异性(HRV)。在所有测试中获取主观用力程度分级(RPE)。CLE在182±27瓦的功率下进行。时长较长的CLE中,HR、La、峰值每分通气量(V˙Epeak)和RPE显著更高。在次最大强度IE中,不同时长CLE的HR、La和Glu恢复动力学以及HRV或OT之间未发现显著差异。尽管没有显著差异,但恢复动力学符合预期,表明所应用方法的可行性。建议进行更接近CLE结束的最大测试和恢复测试,以更好地显示恢复动力学。这些发现是在个体基础上根据强度和时长制定运动处方的第一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f432/9326728/c5b0220b29e7/jfmk-07-00054-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验