Wolk Donna M, Lanyado Alon, Tice Ann Marie, Shermohammed Maheen, Kinar Yaron, Goren Amir, Chabris Christopher F, Meyer Michelle N, Shoshan Avi, Abedi Vida
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Diagnostic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA.
Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA 18509, USA.
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 26;11(15):4342. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154342.
Influenza vaccinations are recommended for high-risk individuals, but few population-based strategies exist to identify individual risks. Patient-level data from unvaccinated individuals, stratified into retrospective cases (n = 111,022) and controls (n = 2,207,714), informed a machine learning model designed to create an influenza risk score; the model was called the Geisinger Flu-Complications Flag (GFlu-CxFlag). The flag was created and validated on a cohort of 604,389 unique individuals. Risk scores were generated for influenza cases; the complication rate for individuals without influenza was estimated to adjust for unrelated complications. Shapley values were used to examine the model’s correctness and demonstrate its dependence on different features. Bias was assessed for race and sex. Inverse propensity weighting was used in the derivation stage to correct for biases. The GFlu-CxFlag model was compared to the pre-existing Medial EarlySign Flu Algomarker and existing risk guidelines that describe high-risk patients who would benefit from influenza vaccination. The GFlu-CxFlag outperformed other traditional risk-based models; the area under curve (AUC) was 0.786 [0.783−0.789], compared with 0.694 [0.690−0.698] (p-value < 0.00001). The presence of acute and chronic respiratory diseases, age, and previous emergency department visits contributed most to the GFlu-CxFlag model’s prediction. When higher numerical scores were assigned to more severe complications, the GFlu-CxFlag AUC increased to 0.828 [0.823−0.833], with excellent discrimination in the final model used to perform the risk stratification of the population. The GFlu-CxFlag can better identify high-risk individuals than existing models based on vaccination guidelines, thus creating a population-based risk stratification for individual risk assessment and deployment in vaccine hesitancy reduction programs in our health system.
建议高危人群接种流感疫苗,但几乎没有基于人群的策略来识别个体风险。来自未接种疫苗个体的患者层面数据,分为回顾性病例(n = 111,022)和对照(n = 2,207,714),为一个旨在创建流感风险评分的机器学习模型提供了信息;该模型被称为盖辛格流感并发症标志(GFlu - CxFlag)。该标志在一组604,389名独特个体中创建并验证。为流感病例生成风险评分;估计无流感个体的并发症发生率以调整无关并发症。使用夏普利值来检验模型的正确性并证明其对不同特征的依赖性。评估了种族和性别的偏差。在推导阶段使用逆倾向加权来校正偏差。将GFlu - CxFlag模型与现有的Medial EarlySign流感算法标记物和描述将从流感疫苗接种中受益的高危患者的现有风险指南进行比较。GFlu - CxFlag优于其他传统的基于风险的模型;曲线下面积(AUC)为0.786 [0.783 - 0.789],而(另一个模型)为0.694 [0.690 - 0.698](p值<0.00001)。急性和慢性呼吸道疾病、年龄以及先前的急诊科就诊对GFlu - CxFlag模型的预测贡献最大。当为更严重的并发症赋予更高的数值分数时,GFlu - CxFlag的AUC增加到0.828 [0.823 - 0.833],在用于对人群进行风险分层的最终模型中具有出色的区分度。与基于疫苗接种指南的现有模型相比,GFlu - CxFlag能够更好地识别高危个体,从而为个体风险评估创建基于人群的风险分层,并在我们的卫生系统中用于减少疫苗犹豫的项目中。