Instituto de Química Orgánica General (CSIC), Juan de la Cierva 3, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Grupo de Investigación Biotecnología, Calidad Medioambiental y Seguridad Agroalimentaria (BICAMSA), Universidad del Cauca, Popayán 190003, Colombia.
Nutrients. 2022 Jul 27;14(15):3077. doi: 10.3390/nu14153077.
Food supplements of plant origin for weight control are increasingly being demanded by consumers as a way to promote good health. Among them, those based on (GCFS) are widely commercialized considering their bioactive properties, mainly due to (-)-hydroxycitric acid ((-)-HCA). However, recently, controversy has arisen over their safety; thus, further research and continuous monitoring of their composition is required. Hence, in this work, a multi-analytical approach was followed to determine not only (-)-HCA but also other constituents of 18 GCFS, which could be used as quality markers to detect fraudulent practices in these samples. Discrepancies between the declared (-)-HCA content and that experimentally determined were detected by LC-UV in 33% of the samples. Moreover, GC-MS analyses of GCFS allowed the detection of different compounds not present in fruits and not declared on supplement labels, probably related to heat exposure or to the addition of excipients or other extracts. This multi-analytical methodology is shown to be advantageous to address different fraudulent practices affecting the quality of these supplements.
作为促进健康的一种方式,消费者对植物源体重控制食品补充剂的需求日益增加。其中,基于(GCFS)的产品因其生物活性特性而被广泛商业化,主要是由于(-)-羟基柠檬酸((-)-HCA)。然而,最近,人们对其安全性产生了争议;因此,需要进一步研究并持续监测其成分。因此,在这项工作中,采用了多分析方法来确定不仅是(-)-HCA,而且还有 18 种 GCFS 的其他成分,这些成分可用作质量标志物来检测这些样品中的欺诈行为。通过 LC-UV 在 33%的样品中检测到所宣称的(-)-HCA 含量与实验测定的含量之间存在差异。此外,GC-MS 对 GCFS 的分析允许检测到水果中不存在且补充剂标签上未声明的不同化合物,这些化合物可能与热暴露或赋形剂或其他提取物的添加有关。这种多分析方法被证明有利于解决影响这些补充剂质量的不同欺诈行为。