• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国国家资助的医疗保健专业人员临床学术培训奖项提供方面的不平等:英国四个国家的定量比较。

Inequalities of provision of nationally funded clinical academic training awards for healthcare professionals: quantitative comparisons across the four nations of the UK.

作者信息

Peters Andy, Cameron Heather, Cunningham Scott, Dawkes Susan, Donaldson Jayne, Hughes Liz, Savinc Jan, MacArthur Juliet

机构信息

Allied Health Professions Research & Development Facilitator, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.

Director of Allied Health Professions, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

J Res Nurs. 2025 Mar 15:17449871241291947. doi: 10.1177/17449871241291947.

DOI:10.1177/17449871241291947
PMID:40099201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11910738/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a common perception that investment in clinical academic training awards for healthcare professions (not medicine and dentistry) in England outweighs that in the devolved nations (Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland) of the United Kingdom.

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate this perception by gathering data on the number of such awards made and the level of associated expenditure by each of the nations during 2017-2022.

METHODS

Freedom of Information requests were sent to government agencies that provide nationally funded clinical academic training awards in each UK nation. Data on the number of awards provided, the whole time equivalent salaries and durations applicable and the expenditures entailed in the period 2017-2022 were broken down into six levels of training, from internship through to post-doctoral. Standardised per capita comparisons were made between nations.

RESULTS

Large differences were found between nations. Only England provided awards in all categories. Wales made the most awards per capita. Scotland invested less than a sixth of that spent by England per capita and under half of that spent by Wales or Northern Ireland.

CONCLUSIONS

Strategic approaches focusing on opportunities across the whole career pathway, particularly in the devolved nations, are recommended to achieve cross-national parity.

摘要

背景

人们普遍认为,在英国,对医疗保健专业(不包括医学和牙科)临床学术培训奖励的投资超过了对联合王国下放权力国家(苏格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰)的投资。

目的

我们旨在通过收集2017年至2022年期间每个国家此类奖励的数量以及相关支出水平的数据来评估这一观点。

方法

向英国每个国家提供国家资助的临床学术培训奖励的政府机构发送信息公开申请。2017年至2022年期间提供的奖励数量、全职等效工资和适用期限以及所需支出的数据被细分为从实习到博士后的六个培训级别。对各国进行了标准化的人均比较。

结果

各国之间存在很大差异。只有英格兰提供了所有类别的奖励。威尔士人均奖励最多。苏格兰的人均投资不到英格兰的六分之一,不到威尔士或北爱尔兰的一半。

结论

建议采取注重整个职业发展路径机会的战略方法,特别是在权力下放国家,以实现跨国平等。

相似文献

1
Inequalities of provision of nationally funded clinical academic training awards for healthcare professionals: quantitative comparisons across the four nations of the UK.英国国家资助的医疗保健专业人员临床学术培训奖项提供方面的不平等:英国四个国家的定量比较。
J Res Nurs. 2025 Mar 15:17449871241291947. doi: 10.1177/17449871241291947.
2
Commentary: Inequalities of provision of nationally funded clinical-academic training awards for healthcare professionals: quantitative comparisons across the four nations of the United Kingdom.评论:国家资助的医疗专业人员临床学术培训奖励提供的不平等:英国四个国家的定量比较
J Res Nurs. 2025 Mar 15:17449871251317507. doi: 10.1177/17449871251317507.
3
Inequalities in local government spending on cultural, environmental and planning services: a time-trend analysis in England, Scotland, and Wales.地方政府在文化、环境和规划服务方面支出的不平等:英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士的时间趋势分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;23(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15179-9.
4
The fraction of cancer attributable to modifiable risk factors in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the United Kingdom in 2015.2015 年英格兰、威尔士、苏格兰、北爱尔兰和英国归因于可改变风险因素的癌症比例。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Apr;118(8):1130-1141. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0029-6. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
5
Achieving Spread, Scale Up and Sustainability of Video Consulting Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic? Findings From a Comparative Case Study of Policy Implementation in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.在新冠疫情期间实现视频咨询服务的推广、扩大规模及可持续性?来自英格兰、威尔士、苏格兰和北爱尔兰政策实施比较案例研究的结果
Front Digit Health. 2021 Dec 20;3:754319. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.754319. eCollection 2021.
6
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
7
Integrating electronic healthcare records of armed forces personnel: Developing a framework for evaluating health outcomes in England, Scotland and Wales.整合武装部队人员的电子健康记录:在英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士评估健康结果的框架。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 May;113:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
8
Undervaccination and severe COVID-19 outcomes: meta-analysis of national cohort studies in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales.疫苗接种不足与严重 COVID-19 结局:英格兰、北爱尔兰、苏格兰和威尔士的全国队列研究的荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2024 Feb 10;403(10426):554-566. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02467-4. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
9
Impact of first UK COVID-19 lockdown on hospital admissions: Interrupted time series study of 32 million people.英国首次新冠疫情封锁对住院人数的影响:对3200万人的中断时间序列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Jul;49:101462. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101462. Epub 2022 May 20.
10
Women's Health Hubs: a rapid mixed-methods evaluation.妇女健康中心:快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(30):1-138. doi: 10.3310/JYFT5036.

引用本文的文献

1
What is nursing to you? The importance of personal reflection in a professional context.对你来说,护理是什么?个人反思在专业背景下的重要性。
J Res Nurs. 2025 Mar;30(2):107-110. doi: 10.1177/17449871251323232. Epub 2025 May 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Increasing nursing and midwifery research leadership: impact evaluation of the National Institute for Health and Care Research Senior Nurse and Midwife Research Leader Programme at 1 year.提升护理与助产领域的研究领导力:对英国国家卫生与保健研究院高级护士及助产士研究领袖计划1年期影响的评估
J Res Nurs. 2023 Nov;28(6-7):516-528. doi: 10.1177/17449871231201550. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
2
Research Quality-Lessons from the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021.研究质量——来自2021年英国卓越研究框架(REF)的经验教训
Nurs Rep. 2022 Jul 7;12(3):510-514. doi: 10.3390/nursrep12030048.
3
A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis exploring the impacts of clinical academic activity by healthcare professionals outside medicine.一项探索医疗保健专业人员在医学之外开展临床学术活动的影响的定性系统评价和主题综合研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 29;21(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06354-y.
4
Multimethods study comparing the experiences of medical clinical academics with nurses, midwives and allied health professionals pursuing a clinical academic career.一项多方法研究,比较医学临床学者与从事临床学术职业的护士、助产士及专职医疗人员的经历。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 1;11(4):e043270. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043270.
5
Enablers and barriers to progressing a clinical academic career in nursing, midwifery and allied health professions: A cross-sectional survey.护理、助产及相关健康专业临床学术职业发展的促进因素与障碍:一项横断面调查。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Feb;31(3-4):406-416. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15673. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
6
Interventions and strategies aimed at clinical academic pathway development for nurses in the United Kingdom: A systematised review of the literature.干预措施和策略旨在为英国护士发展临床学术途径:文献系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Jun;30(11-12):1502-1518. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15657. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
7
Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: a three-stage review.临床医生和组织参与研究是否能提高医疗保健绩效:三阶段综述
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 9;5(12):e009415. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009415.
8
Developing a clinical academic career pathway for nursing.为护理行业制定临床学术职业发展路径。
Br J Nurs. 2012;21(18):1084-6, 1088-90. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.18.1084.
9
Effects on patients of their healthcare practitioner's or institution's participation in clinical trials: a systematic review.患者的医疗从业者或医疗机构参与临床试验的影响:系统评价。
Trials. 2011 Jan 20;12:16. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-16.
10
Better outcomes for patients treated at hospitals that participate in clinical trials.在参与临床试验的医院接受治疗的患者有更好的治疗结果。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Mar 24;168(6):657-62. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.124.