Jesus Filipe, Sousa Mónica, Nunes Catarina L, Francisco Ruben, Rocha Paulo, Minderico Cláudia S, Sardinha Luís B, Silva Analiza M
Exercise and Health Laboratory, CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa,Portugal.
Nutrition and Lifestyle, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa,Portugal.
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2022 Jul 13;32(6):479-490. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.2022-0039. Print 2022 Nov 1.
During the athletic season, changes in body composition occur due to fluctuations in energy expenditure and energy intake. Literature regarding changes of energy availability (EA) is still scarce. The aim was to estimate EA of athletes from nonweight and weight-sensitive sports during the athletic season (i.e., preparatory and competitive phase). Eighty-eight athletes (19.1 ± 4.2 years, 21.8 ± 2.0 kg/m2, 27% females, self-reported eumenorrheic) from five sports (basketball [n = 29]; handball [n = 7]; volleyball [n = 9]; swimming [n = 18]; and triathlon [n = 25]) were included in this observational study. Energy intake and exercise energy expenditure were measured through doubly labeled water (over 7 days and considering neutral energy balance) and metabolic equivalents of tasks, respectively. Fat-free mass (FFM) was assessed through a four-compartment model. EA was calculated as EA = (energy intake - exercise energy expenditure)/FFM. Linear mixed models, adjusted for sex, were performed to assess EA for the impact of time by sport interaction. Among all sports, EA increased over the season: basketball, estimated mean (SE): 7.2 (1.5) kcal/kg FFM, p < .001; handball, 14.8 (2.9) kcal/kg FFM, p < .001; volleyball, 7.9 (2.8) kcal/kg FFM, p = .006; swimming, 8.7 (2.0) kcal/kg FFM, p < .001; and triathlon, 9.6 (2.0) kcal/kg FFM, p < .001. Eleven athletes (12.5%) had clinical low EA at the preparatory phase and none during the competitive phase. During both assessments, triathletes' EA was below optimal, being lower than basketballers (p < .001), volleyballers (p < .05), and swimmers (p < .001). Although EA increased in all sports, triathlon's EA was below optimal during both assessments. Risk of low EA might be seasonal and resolved throughout the season, with higher risk during the preparatory phase. However, in weight-sensitive sports, namely triathlon, low EA is still present.
在运动赛季期间,由于能量消耗和能量摄入的波动,身体成分会发生变化。关于能量可利用性(EA)变化的文献仍然很少。本研究旨在评估非体重敏感型和体重敏感型运动项目的运动员在运动赛季(即准备期和比赛期)的能量可利用性。本观察性研究纳入了来自五个运动项目的88名运动员(年龄19.1±4.2岁,体重指数21.8±2.0kg/m²,27%为女性,自我报告月经正常),这些运动项目包括篮球(n=29)、手球(n=7)、排球(n=9)、游泳(n=18)和铁人三项(n=25)。能量摄入和运动能量消耗分别通过双标水法(为期7天并考虑能量平衡)和代谢当量来测量。无脂肪体重(FFM)通过四成分模型进行评估。能量可利用性的计算公式为EA =(能量摄入 - 运动能量消耗)/FFM。采用调整了性别的线性混合模型来评估EA受运动项目与时间交互作用的影响。在所有运动项目中,能量可利用性在整个赛季都有所增加:篮球项目,估计均值(标准误):7.2(1.5)kcal/kg FFM,p <.001;手球项目,14.8(2.9)kcal/kg FFM,p <.001;排球项目,7.9(2.8)kcal/kg FFM,p =.006;游泳项目,8.7(2.0)kcal/kg FFM,p <.001;铁人三项项目,9.6(2.0)kcal/kg FFM,p <.001。11名运动员(12.5%)在准备期临床能量可利用性较低,而在比赛期则无。在两次评估中,铁人三项运动员的能量可利用性均低于最佳水平,低于篮球运动员(p <.001)、排球运动员(p <.05)和游泳运动员(p <.001)。尽管所有运动项目的能量可利用性都有所增加,但铁人三项在两次评估中的能量可利用性均低于最佳水平。能量可利用性低的风险可能具有季节性,并在整个赛季中得到缓解,在准备期风险更高。然而,在体重敏感型运动项目中,即铁人三项,能量可利用性仍然较低。